Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM 10.X Self Provisioning

ontact the sender and delete all copies. From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Anthony Holloway Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2016 10:58 AM To: Ben Story Cc: Cisco VoIP Group Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM 10.X Self Provisioning How did you end up solving this? I'm ac

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM 10.X Self Provisioning

How did you end up solving this? I'm actually facing this situation in the real world, and am wondering what option you went with, and how it went? Has anyone else done something similar? On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 10:57 AM, Ben Story wrote: > I've been playing with the Self

[cisco-voip] CUCM 10.X Self Provisioning

I've been playing with the Self Provisioning feature within CUCM 10.x. I've got it working if I have a user with an assigned extension. Is there a way to use this feature for phones that won't be tied to a user like TAPS can do? -- Ben Story CCSP, CCNA, CCNA Wireless, CCDA ben.st...@gmail.com

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM 10.X Self Provisioning

The short answer is I don't think you can. Did you see this? *Set Up Cisco Unified Communications Manager to Support Self-Provisioning*Before You Begin The administrator *must* first either add the end user using the Bulk Administration Tool or synchronize the end user from LDAP to add

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM 10.X Self Provisioning

Nice work around. Thanks for the idea Anthony. In healthcare it's the exception that a phone has an assigned user so we buck Cisco's deployment tool trends. -- Ben Story CCSP, CCNA, CCNA Wireless, CCDA ben.st...@gmail.com @ntwrk80 http://showbrain.blogspot.com http://rand0mw0rds.blogspot.com

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM 10.X Self Provisioning

Anthony is correct that the self in the feature is for end users. Depending on your deployment specifics I think it would be an easy modification to treat the physical location as the enduser rather than the person making the call. You probably also saw that there is an admin pin in the