OK, I know it is weird to respond to your own email... but...
The blocking of toll fraud is via MTLS on port 5062 with Cisco... we create
an MTLS session first before accepting the invite.
Jonathan
On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 4:20 PM Jonathan Charles wrote:
> Enabling Cisco hybrid call and routin
My favourite meditation is to call TAC and listen to hold music š
From: Ryan Huff
Date: Friday, 17 May 2019 at 2:12 am
To: Anthony Holloway
Cc: Tim Smith , "cisco-voip@puck.nether.net"
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Call flow for device registered to Hybrid Cloud via
local PSTN
,
"cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>"
mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Call flow for device registered to Hybrid Cloud via
local PSTN
This is Webex Hybrid Calling (which was formerly Spark Hybrid calling). Whether
you configu
It is for Cisco Webex Boards, Room Kits and some SX80s all registered to
the Webex Hybrid Cloud
Jonathan
On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 7:04 PM Brian Meade wrote:
> Be aware that Call Service Connect is being deprecated for anything
> besides Video Endpoints.
>
> If this is for Webex Teams client, th
find it in my Teams search ā¹
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
>
>
> Tim
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: *Ryan Huff
> *Date: *Thursday, 16 May 2019 at 12:14 pm
> *To: *Tim Smith
> *Cc: *Jonathan Charles , "cisco-voip@puck.nether.net" <
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>
ubject: Re: [cisco-voip] Call flow for device registered to Hybrid Cloud via
local PSTN
"As part of the integration between BroadCloud Calling and Webex Teams, Cisco
is launching the Cisco Calling App. If a user wants to make a call from Webex
Teams, they can cross-launch the callin
ther.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>"
mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Call flow for device registered to Hybrid Cloud via
local PSTN
This is Webex Hybrid Calling (which was formerly Spark Hybrid calling). Whether
you configure for cloud regis
s mailto:jonv...@gmail.com>>,
"cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>"
mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Call flow for device registered to Hybrid Cloud via
local PSTN
This is Webex Hybrid Calling (which was formerly Spar
o-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net>>
on behalf of Jonathan Charles mailto:jonv...@gmail.com>>
Date: Thursday, 16 May 2019 at 9:30 am
To: Ryan Huff mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>>
Cc: "cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>"
mailto:cisco-voip@puck.net
-voip@puck.nether.net"
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Call flow for device registered to Hybrid Cloud via
local PSTN
This is Webex Hybrid Calling (which was formerly Spark Hybrid calling). Whether
you configure for cloud registered codec devices, or Webex Teams clients, both
use cases us
ailto:jonv...@gmail.com>>
Date: Thursday, 16 May 2019 at 9:30 am
To: Ryan Huff mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>>
Cc: "cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>"
mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Call flow for device register
partners only)
These hybrid features are really starting to rock and roll now.
Cheers,
Tim
From: cisco-voip on behalf of Jonathan
Charles
Date: Thursday, 16 May 2019 at 9:30 am
To: Ryan Huff
Cc: "cisco-voip@puck.nether.net"
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Call flow for device registered
This is god content. Thanks!
One thing Iāve enabled for adoption reasons, is people being able to use the
extension as the video address for room kits.
I know this isnāt the best design plan, but we donāt really have any other
naming convention we could use at the moment.
Iāll have to look at
Be aware that Call Service Connect is being deprecated for anything besides
Video Endpoints.
If this is for Webex Teams client, they want you to start looking at
Unified CM calling in Webex Teams.
https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/cloudCollaboration/wbxt/ucmcalling/unified-cm-wbx
Inbound Flow (PSTN user calls userās DID):
GW > CCM > (per userWebex Hybrid CTI Device) > Exp-C > Exp-E > ControlHub >
(rings your cloud registered device)
Outbound Flow (cloud registered device calls PSTN via CCM or other on-prem
device):
Cloud registered device (ControlHub) > Exp-E > Exp-C >
It's only a matter of time that the SCCP phones will not function with the
latest features. I realize that the 79x5's just went EOL a couple of years
ago, but we've had SIP only phones for at least 8 years now.
On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 6:22 PM Lelio Fulgenzi wrote:
> Whoa.
>
>
> Unified
Thanks!... looks like I have some more reading to do... so how does it
prevent anyone from sending a pstn number to my expressway? How does it
authenticate the Webex devices to pass calls to CUCM for?
Customer has enterprise licensing, so they should be able to do whatever
they want...
Jonathan
Whoa.
Unified CM Device Requirements
Hybrid Call Service is supported only with Cisco SIP phones and Cisco Jabber
clients that are registered to Unified CM.
SCCP phones may encounter problems due to the 48-character limitation on the
destination address.
-sent from mobile d
Youāll need a specific Webex DNS zone and the traversal trunk really just needs
to support pre-loaded route headers and SIP parameter preservation (those are
the most significant differences over the traversal / neighbor zone you might
have setup for B2B).
Itās a simple enough configuration, bu
Very good question. From what I understand, thereās a special traversal link
built and itās all ābuilt-inā and uses the CSS of the remote destination or
something like that.
Iāve read absolutely zero docs about this. This is all based on a quick convo I
had. I had the same worries and if I rec
Enabling Cisco hybrid call and routing calls to the PSTN using local
gateway (via Expressway C/E pair).
What search rules do we need on the E and C?
How do we prevent toll fraud if we have E.164 patterns inbound on our
Expressways?
Am I being paranoid?
Jonathan
21 matches
Mail list logo
