Re: [cisco-voip] QoS Policing Bandwidth Question

2014-11-23 Thread Jason Aarons (AM)
VoIP Group Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] QoS Policing Bandwidth Question Thanks for sharing your experience Jason. What was the exceed action set to? Drop or remark and transmit? Do you recall? I'm thinking drop, because a remark to what would typically be CS1 shouldn't cause too much of a fuss

Re: [cisco-voip] QoS Policing Bandwidth Question

2014-11-23 Thread Anthony Holloway
...@gmail.com Sent: ‎11/‎22/‎2014 9:40 PM To: Cisco VoIP Group cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] QoS Policing Bandwidth Question Oops! Sorry folks, but I have an error in my explanation of my selection. However, for the sake of keeping my reply hidden from view, I cannot easily

Re: [cisco-voip] QoS Policing Bandwidth Question

2014-11-23 Thread Ed Leatherman
I got halfway through your message and thought I would just pick 100k and be done with it haha :) On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 6:14 PM, Anthony Holloway avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com wrote: Here's a little Saturday afternoon thought provoking question for the group. If you were asked to police

[cisco-voip] QoS Policing Bandwidth Question

2014-11-22 Thread Anthony Holloway
Here's a little Saturday afternoon thought provoking question for the group. If you were asked to police your access ports to allow only a single g711 call, which of the following values is correct? Assume you run an Ethernet based LAN on Cisco switches for this question. A. 80Kbps B.

Re: [cisco-voip] QoS Policing Bandwidth Question

2014-11-22 Thread Josh Warcop
B. From: Anthony Hollowaymailto:avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com Sent: ‎11/‎22/‎2014 9:17 PM To: Cisco VoIP Groupmailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: [cisco-voip] QoS Policing Bandwidth Question Here's a little Saturday afternoon thought provoking question

Re: [cisco-voip] QoS Policing Bandwidth Question

2014-11-22 Thread Anthony Holloway
Oops! Sorry folks, but I have an error in my explanation of my selection. However, for the sake of keeping my reply hidden from view, I cannot easily correct it via the mailing list (a benefit of a web forum). When you spot it, you'll know, and you may even be able to guess why it's wrong.

Re: [cisco-voip] QoS Policing Bandwidth Question

2014-11-22 Thread Josh Warcop
Groupmailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] QoS Policing Bandwidth Question Oops! Sorry folks, but I have an error in my explanation of my selection. However, for the sake of keeping my reply hidden from view, I cannot easily correct it via the mailing list (a benefit

Re: [cisco-voip] QoS Policing Bandwidth Question

2014-11-22 Thread Jason Aarons (AM)
] On Behalf Of Josh Warcop Sent: Saturday, November 22, 2014 9:34 PM To: Anthony Holloway; Cisco VoIP Group Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] QoS Policing Bandwidth Question B. From: Anthony Hollowaymailto:avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com Sent: ‎11/‎22/‎2014 9:17 PM To: Cisco