...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
Hughes, Scott GRE-MG
Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2014 2:02 AM
To: Anthony Holloway
Cc: cisco-voip (cisco-voip@puck.nether.net)
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] cucm 10.5(1) vs 10.0(1)
I would love for some clarification on this-- specifically VG224, 7925, and
7937 support.
On Jul 8
Ryan, I will send you the details directly if you want, but here's what a
Cisco PDI help desk person had to say on the topic:
Regarding your query, what the information you provided means is that this
models has not been tested on version 10.5 of CUCM so no compatibility is
guarantee, this does
Just because the system test folks don't test something doesn't make it not
supported.
The actual compatibility info I'd say is at
http://tools.cisco.com/ITDIT/vtgsca/VTGServlet (linked from software
compatibility matrix).
At the end of the day unless the UCM version or endpoint has reached
, 2014 2:02:11 AM
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] cucm 10.5(1) vs 10.0(1)
I would love for some clarification on this-- specifically VG224, 7925, and
7937 support.
On Jul 8, 2014, at 3:26 PM, Anthony Holloway
avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.commailto:avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com
wrote:
It appears
I would love for some clarification on this-- specifically VG224, 7925, and
7937 support.
On Jul 8, 2014, at 3:26 PM, Anthony Holloway
avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.commailto:avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com wrote:
It appears as though CUCM 10.5 drops official support for some phone and
gateway
Thanks Anthony good point. Anyone from Cisco on the list can clarify this plz?
VG224 and 7937 will definitely be a big deal.
-gr
On 9 Jul 2014, at 4:02 pm, Hughes, Scott GRE-MG shug...@grenergy.com
wrote:
I would love for some clarification on this-- specifically VG224, 7925, and
7937
Hi Guys,
Was just about to do a fresh installation of ucm/cuc/imp on a Cisco BE6k. Is
10.5 mature enough to go ahead?
Anyone has anything to share on whether to go for a 10.0 or 10.5?
Googling didnot yield sufficient results - if anyone can share there first hand
experience or thoughts would
10.5 is going to be a long-term release with more updates. 10.0 will
probably not be getting any more updates. Most people don't run X.0
software in production unless a certain feature is really, really needed
immediately.
Think of 10.0 similar to 8.0 and 10.5 similar to 8.5. People are still
-
From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of GR
Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2014 8:23 AM
To: cisco-voip (cisco-voip@puck.nether.net)
Subject: [cisco-voip] cucm 10.5(1) vs 10.0(1)
Hi Guys,
Was just about to do a fresh installation of ucm/cuc/imp on a Cisco BE6k
[mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Heim,
Dennis
Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2014 10:21 AM
To: GR; cisco-voip (cisco-voip@puck.nether.net)
Subject: [QUARANTINE] Re: [cisco-voip] cucm 10.5(1) vs 10.0(1)
Importance: Low
I'd go with 10.5. Traditionally once the first non dot zero release
I haven't run into any problems with 10.5(1) on CUCM yet. But... if you
want to use SRST Manager it is only compatable with 9.x until later this
summer when they release the new version.
--
Ben Story
CCSP, CCNA, CCNA Wireless, CCDA
ben.st...@gmail.com
@ntwrk80
http://showbrain.blogspot.com
-voip@puck.nether.net)
Subject: [QUARANTINE] Re: [cisco-voip] cucm 10.5(1) vs 10.0(1)
Importance: Low
I'd go with 10.5. Traditionally once the first non dot zero release is RTM,
the dot zero no longer sees development and Cisco generally steers you toward
upgrading off the .0.
Dennis Heim
12 matches
Mail list logo
