behalf of Tim Frazee
Date: Wednesday, 2 August 2017 at 2:44 am
To: Matt Jacobson
Cc: "cisco-voip@puck.nether.net"
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] how long to let expressway updates bake
sitting on 8.9.2 until we go with 11.5(1)SU3, which we'll then go to .10
On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 a
gt;> le...@uoguelph.ca
>>
>> www.uoguelph.ca/ccs
>>
>> Room 037, Animal Science and Nutrition Building
>>
>> Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Ryan Huff [mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com]
>> *Sent:* Tuesday, July 18, 2017 12
*To:* Lelio Fulgenzi
> *Cc:* Tim Frazee; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
>
> *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] how long to let expressway updates bake
>
>
>
> I'm talking about the remote screen sharing features :).
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>
> On Jul 18, 2017, at 12
[mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2017 12:10 PM
To: Lelio Fulgenzi
Cc: Tim Frazee; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] how long to let expressway updates bake
I'm talking about the remote screen sharing features :).
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 18, 2017, at 12:
trition Building
Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1
From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Ryan
Huff
Sent: Monday, July 17, 2017 3:28 PM
To: Tim Frazee
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] how long to let
: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] how long to let expressway updates bake
What? Jabber MRA not working in Expressway 8.8+
Wasn’t that the primary reason for expressway? Eek.
Is this in the release notes?
---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst, Network Infrastructure
Computing
long to let expressway updates bake
I'd personally say anything 8.8+ is good 2 go and it's mostly still just the
Jabber stuff that doesn't work over MRA (which is documented).
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 17, 2017, at 3:20 PM, Tim Frazee
mailto:tfra...@gmail.com>> wrote:
W
8.10 dropped and was wondering how fast people typically start planning for
upgrades. personally I'm waiting for 11.5(1)su3 to drop and sit for a bit
before i'd bother with 8.10, but just wanted to get the temp of the group.
On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 2:28 PM, Ryan Huff wrote:
> I'd personally say
I'd personally say anything 8.8+ is good 2 go and it's mostly still just the
Jabber stuff that doesn't work over MRA (which is documented).
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 17, 2017, at 3:20 PM, Tim Frazee
mailto:tfra...@gmail.com>> wrote:
When I say "sit" would be how long do I let other Cisco cust
When I say "sit" would be how long do I let other Cisco customers find any
serious issues before I would hop on. Wait for the "a" revision to drop.
was typical back in the day. not sure if expressway had the same history.
On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 10:25 AM, Ryan Huff wrote:
> Not sure what you're
Not sure what you're referring to by "sit"? Are you referring to a hardware
burn-in of the host chassis the guest VM is running on?
During the non-production period, is the business using it to validate its
configuration and usability for its specified business case? Usually, once UAT
(User Acc
Hi
new to the expressway suite and was wondering whats the average wait time
(if any) for new versions of expressway to sit before you consider them
production worthy.
for ucm/cup/cuc, I usually give it no more than a month before I would
consider it "stable" but was interested in what this group
12 matches
Mail list logo
