[cisco-voip] Disabling placed call history on 7841's

2014-03-19 Thread Matthew Collins
Hi All, I have a requirement to disable the call history on a selected amount of 7841 handsets. To start with the call history has now been moved under the services button and not the directory’s button. I know I can disable the logged calls under the line settings and this stops all received

Re: [cisco-voip] Disabling placed call history on 7841's

2014-03-19 Thread Stephen Welsh
Hi Matt, Just tested on our 7841 (sip78xx.10-1-1-9) by sending Init:CallHistory using PhoneView and it worked fine. Error 4 is usually an authentication Error, if you are pushing (HTTP POST) the CiscoIPPhoneExecute object to the phone I suspect their is something wrong with the Authentication

Re: [cisco-voip] Disabling placed call history on 7841's

2014-03-19 Thread Matthew Collins
Ok, Thanks for the pointer Steven, I have now kind of got this working on the Idle URL, but after the phone request the idle URL the phone is stuck in the following state until I go off hook. The Cancel softkey button doesn’t seem to do anything [cid:image002.png@01CF4375.4DDDCD50] It has req

Re: [cisco-voip] Disabling placed call history on 7841's

2014-03-19 Thread Stephen Welsh
You could try adding a “Init:Services” ExecuteItem after the Init:CallHistory to see if that closes the page, assuming that it has pulled/parsed the page correctly and just needs to close the Services page. On 19 Mar 2014, at 13:33, Matthew Collins mailto:mcoll...@block.co.uk>> wrote: Ok

[cisco-voip] CME with 78XX handsets

2014-03-19 Thread Andy
Ok, I know they aren't support as yet but we have been told that you can configure CME to think these are a supported handset, but for the life of me I can't get it to work. this has come about as Cisco have eol 69XX series and someone spec'd these. This is the link we have been given which is

Re: [cisco-voip] SIP Stack & Trace Question

2014-03-19 Thread Daniel Pagan
Wrapping up on this one... The SIP Stack error below occurred because CUCM (as the UAS) received an UPDATE request before receiving a PRACK for its 183 w/ answer. Possible solution is to have CUCM send a Require: 100rel in the 183 answer, forcing the UAC to PRACK before sending the update, but

Re: [cisco-voip] applying a second restore to a newly built cluster - license files? [UPDATE 1]

2014-03-19 Thread Ryan Ratliff (rratliff)
There's a defect for the old license files triggering the grace period error. There's another one for the CLI command to delete licenses not working, so I'm glad you didn't hit that one :) But yes, since the licenses are included in the backup when you did your second restore it stuck the old

[cisco-voip] CER ELIN Configuration and E.164

2014-03-19 Thread Erick Wellnitz
I think I'm making this more complicated than it needs to be. I have CER 10. All of our inbound caller IDs from the PSTN are E.164 formatted. +13125551212 for example. When configuring the ERL, this is not a problem. I can enter +13125551212 for the ELIN. My translation patterns strip the +1 a

Re: [cisco-voip] applying a second restore to a newly built cluster - license files? [UPDATE 1]

2014-03-19 Thread Lelio Fulgenzi
Thanks Ryan. I knew I was pushing my luck with doing multiple restores, so I'm really glad it worked out. I was ready to start from scratch. Lelio --- Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. Senior Analyst, Network Infrastructure Computing and Communications Services (CCS) University of Guelph 519‐824‐412

Re: [cisco-voip] CER ELIN Configuration and E.164

2014-03-19 Thread Erick Wellnitz
Answered my own question. I made it much more complicated in my mind than it really is. On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 10:54 AM, Erick Wellnitz wrote: > I think I'm making this more complicated than it needs to be. > > I have CER 10. > > All of our inbound caller IDs from the PSTN are E.164 formatted.

Re: [cisco-voip] WebEx Meetings Server 2.0 OVA

2014-03-19 Thread Tim Smith
Thanks John, It only looks like one bug, which wouldn't affect us. CSCum96822 3 Grow fails to update expanded system to same version as source system Cheers, Tim From: John Parduhn [mailto:pard...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, 18 March 2014 10:40 AM To: Tim Smith Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net

Re: [cisco-voip] WebEx Meetings Server 2.0 OVA

2014-03-19 Thread John Parduhn
Sweet! Thanks, Tim. John On Mar 19, 2014 3:53 PM, "Tim Smith" wrote: > Thanks John, > > > > It only looks like one bug, which wouldn't affect us. > > > > CSCum96822 > > 3 > > Grow fails to update expanded system to same version as source system > > > > Cheers, > > > > Tim > > > > *From:* John

Re: [cisco-voip] CUPC - Unable to go into deskphone control mode and unable to chat

2014-03-19 Thread Jeffrey Girard
Update – Well, I finally bit the bullet and stood up a MS AD domain in my lab. I integrated CUCM into the LDAP and imported the users from LDAP I also stood up a DNS server. I reconfigured CUPS to the new domain, joined all of the endpoint laptops to the

Re: [cisco-voip] CUPC - Unable to go into deskphone control mode and unable to chat

2014-03-19 Thread Ryan Huff
H ... CUPC is old tech . Let me fire up the not-so-way-back machine. Device and client control almost always comes down to an ownership issue 1. End User has Standard CTI Enabled privilege 2. User owns the Client Services Framework profile 3. User owns the actual phone (unless just

Re: [cisco-voip] Collaboration Edge for Jabber

2014-03-19 Thread Dana Tong
Hey all, Back on this testing for MRA on Collab Edge... I’ve run up Wireshark on the computer that I signed in on. When I establish a call to mobile, or the MCU from the Internet I can see that my destination address is the PRIVATE IP of the Expressway Edge. The Expressway E is configured with

Re: [cisco-voip] Collaboration Edge for Jabber

2014-03-19 Thread Dana Tong
Just to clarify, normal inbound/ outbound video calls work. The Expressway does not have the Dual Network Interface option key. Cheers From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Dana Tong Sent: Thursday, 20 March 2014 2:14 PM To: Jason Aarons (AM); Ki Wi; Cisco V

Re: [cisco-voip] Collaboration Edge for Jabber

2014-03-19 Thread Dana Tong
The SDP in the logs appears to show : C = IN IP4 192.168.x.x I’ve emailed my Cisco rep to see if he can get me a demo option key for the Dual Network Interface option so I can try the Static NAT config on the VCSE. From: Dana Tong Sent: Thursday, 20 March 2014 3:21 PM To: Dana Tong; Jason Aaro