Excellent. Good work.
On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 4:56 AM, Pete Brown wrote:
>
> Thanks to everyone who responded. The routine is now compatible with decoder
> versions 1, 2 and 3. So far it has worked with every passphrase tested
> from 8.5 up to 12.
>
>
> You can decode your own
While I haven't tried to test this specifically, my understanding is that a
network transport that fully supports jumbo frames (e.g. 9000 bytes) will
cause no issues with hosts configured with 1500 byte MTU trying to
communicate. I thought the issues can happen when the configured MTU in the
two
Hey Mike,
That actually came from an experience I had. I can actually show you a PCAP of
where it happened. It was a DoD customer so I’d have to sanitize/renumber all
the IPs first. In my case; I did not have access to the far end (and obviously
couldn’t pull pcaps on the subscriber CLI
I’ll add a hard learned lesson here:
Example:
Subscriber sends a frame >1500 bytes. IF the frame makes it through the network
it will by dropped by the NIC on the publisher if it exceeds the MTU configured
on the publisher. You will not see the frame with ‘utils network capture…’ on
the
It's behaving how it would if you hit Enter twice after entering your username,
leaving the password field blank. Is the console cable (and possibly a
USB-to-serial adapter) you're using working fine to console into other routers?
-Original Message-
From: Lelio Fulgenzi
If both servers are MTU 1500 and the network supports 9000, you should be
good.
On the other hand, if one machine is MTU 1500 and the other is greater, and
the network supports greater, it can send a packet too big for the machine
to receive.
On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 12:11 PM, Dave Goodwin
Interesting. I'm using hardware that others have used to connect to other
hosts. And when I modify the config to bypass TACACS+ it works by letting me
login with the enable password. Although, that's complaining and only allowing
level 14, not 15.
It's very weird.
---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
CMR WebEx Meeting Center and Cisco Spark
On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 10:37 PM, Brian Meade wrote:
> Are you trying to do CMR Cloud or CMR Hybrid?
>
> On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 11:29 PM, Jonathan Charles
> wrote:
>
>> We are testing the deployment of TMS and
Are you trying to do CMR Cloud or CMR Hybrid?
On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 11:29 PM, Jonathan Charles
wrote:
> We are testing the deployment of TMS and Exchange to schedule Webex
> meetings...
>
> However when we try to schedule a meeting with Webex and an SX80, we get
> the
For cloud CMR, you need an Expressway running Hybrid Calendar Service as
well. Did you set that up?
It sounds like it's trying to setup as CMR Hybrid based on the error
message.
On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 11:41 PM, Jonathan Charles
wrote:
> CMR WebEx Meeting Center and Cisco
I have an expressway, but it is used for video calling and MRA...
On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 10:53 PM, Brian Meade wrote:
> For cloud CMR, you need an Expressway running Hybrid Calendar Service as
> well. Did you set that up?
>
> It sounds like it's trying to setup as CMR Hybrid
We are connected to Exchange with the Exchange Connector...
On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 11:12 PM, Jonathan Charles
wrote:
> I have an expressway, but it is used for video calling and MRA...
>
> On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 10:53 PM, Brian Meade wrote:
>
>> For cloud
Thanks to everyone who responded. The routine is now compatible with decoder
versions 1, 2 and 3. So far it has worked with every passphrase tested from
8.5 up to 12.
You can decode your own passphrases at the following address. This should go
without saying, but if you root a production
Wow that's fast! I've had TAC many times say waiting for the tool, waiting for
the tool...
Matthew Loraditch
Sr. Network Engineer
p: 443.541.1518
w: www.heliontechnologies.com | e: mloradi...@heliontechnologies.com
From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Pete
Thanks Matthew - looks like either i missed the beta testing window or it
wasn't made available for testing like the earlier versions.
Sent from my iPhone
> On 12 Oct 2017, at 9:41 am, Matthew Loraditch
> wrote:
>
> 12 is FCS for UCM/IMP/UCXN and I think
Yeah no beta.
Matthew Loraditch
Sr. Network Engineer
p: 443.541.1518
w: www.heliontechnologies.com | e: mloradi...@heliontechnologies.com
From: GR [mailto:grc...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2017 7:51 AM
To: Matthew Loraditch
Cc:
16 matches
Mail list logo