You shouldn't need TAC to perform the cleanup of the Sub, but it's my
understanding that they already know that the action of deleting the server
is not 100% clean, so they have a command (a script) to run as root to
clean up some left behind entries. I'd just as soon have them do this, as
it
Hello all,
We are looking to geographical separate our HA UCCX 11.6.1 nodes, which are
currently in "data center 1". We will be installing the UCCX Sub at our
other data center across campus, which is connected by 10Gb fiber. "Data
Center 2" already has two UCM Subscribers and this is where the
HA over WAN allows each server to have different configurations for the
Unified CM connection as well as your call control groups. So you could
have the subscriber connect to a local CUCM subscriber and have different
device pools for those CTI groups to use that local subscriber as well.
I've
You can't convert the model from LAN to WAN, per se. You basically just
destroy your HA by deleting the Sub from the Pub GUI. Then delete your Sub
VM. Then, you rebuild the whole Sub integration from scratch, as if it was
new.
On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 9:55 AM Brian Meade wrote:
> HA over WAN
Yea, I think the process would work fine with new hostname. I'm wondering
if deleting a sub and re-adding/rebuilding with same hostname as WAN causes
some issues which needed that cleanup script.
On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 11:06 AM Anthony Holloway <
avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com> wrote:
> You
Michael,
We are very large University and we wanted geographical separation of our data
centres.
We have moved our UCCX HA servers to two different data centres with VM ware
and UCCS, 22 km (13.7 miles) away over two fibre lines.
We route the VLAN and have no issues as both see each other as a
