Re: [cisco-voip] Stuck conferences on 2911

and its CUCM while calls are active? Does the call stay up like a phone to phone call or is it immediately dropped? Thanks, Eric From: Brian Meade (brmeade) [mailto:brme...@cisco.com] Sent: 03 February 2014 12:29 PM To: Eric Pedersen; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: RE: Stuck conferences on 2911

[cisco-voip] CUCM engineering special versions

TAC is suggesting we go to CUCM 9.1.2. 11021.1, which is an engineering special, to fix a defect. We're already on 9.1.2 SU1. The version number for this is 9.1.2.11900-12 which is higher than the ES. I thought patches always meant going up in version numbers. Do SU versions work differently

Re: [cisco-voip] WebEx Meetings Server 2.0 OVA

From: Tim Smith [mailto:tim.sm...@enject.com.au] Sent: 26 February 2014 4:20 AM To: Andy; Eric Pedersen; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] WebEx Meetings Server 2.0 OVA Hey mate, It should be an OVA. Install and upgrade for that matter are both through deploying OVA via VCenter

[cisco-voip] BRI S/T to U interface convertor

We bought a couple ISDN Link devices to connect BRIs to our Telepresence units. They take BRIs as 4-wire (S/T-interface), but from our service provider we get them as U interface (2 wires) ... seems like this is the standard in North America. Does anyone have recommendations for conversion

Re: [cisco-voip] SSO ADFS Guide?

Just curious, are you using ADFS 2 or 3? We're running 3.0 with WXMS. It works well, but the claim transform rules are kind of tricky to set up. I haven't tried CUCM yet. This blog article was really valuable for WXMS:

Re: [cisco-voip] SSO ADFS Guide?

That's great Tim. Thanks for writing that blog post . I'll have to try the Firefox add-on too. I used Fiddler last time. From: Tim Smith [mailto:tim.sm...@enject.com.au] Sent: 26 June 2014 6:55 AM To: Andrew Grech Cc: Eric Pedersen; Matthew Loraditch; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: Re

Re: [cisco-voip] building a lab server from production data - potential steps

I've done it with a BAT export then import and that worked well. It looks like you can get CUWL PRO demo licenses off the license portal now too. From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Lelio Fulgenzi Sent: 26 June 2014 9:45 AM To: Cisco VOIP Subject:

[cisco-voip] CUWL 10.x licenses

We upgraded to CUCX 10.5 from 9.1 on the weekend and the 9.x licenses installed on PLM need to be upgraded. Does anyone know how to get a PAK for this? I didn't receive any licenses in the upgrade e-delivery for CUCM and CUCX. Thanks, Eric The contents of this message may contain confidential

Re: [cisco-voip] CUWL 10.x licenses

:56 PM To: Eric Pedersen; cisco-voip (cisco-voip@puck.nether.net) Subject: RE: CUWL 10.x licenses You submit a manual case for all major upgrades now. Just like for 8 to 9. Matthew G. Loraditch - CCNP-Voice, CCNA-RS, CCDA 1965 Greenspring Drive Timonium, MD 21093 direct voice. 443.541.1518 fax

[cisco-voip] Local admin required for CUACA 10.5?

I'm starting to test out attendant console advanced 10.5 and the client installer installs CUACA.exe to run as administrator. Are local admin privileges required now? We ran CUEAC 9 fine without local admin. Also the admin guide has said for multiple versions that UAC needs to be disabled on

Re: [cisco-voip] easiest and quickest way to disable a PRI PSTN (MGCP) port?

I thought that didn’t work with MGCP PRIs. Did that change? In the past I used the CUCM service parameter (Change B-Channel Maintenance Status) to busy them out. From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Lelio Fulgenzi Sent: 03 February 2015 8:42 AM To:

Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco Telepresence MX200 as standalone

I see a CalSetupMode option under H.323 with an option for Direct. Ours is running in Gatekeeper mode but we have an SX20 with Direct dialing and it’s basically the same code. From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Charles Goldsmith Sent: 17 January 2015

Re: [cisco-voip] trusted relay points

I believe you can configure your router to be a software MTP with “codec pass-through” as long as you don’t need transcoding. Then you won’t need DSPs. From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Lelio Fulgenzi Sent: 17 February 2015 9:55 AM To: Brian Meade Cc:

Re: [cisco-voip] building lab CUCM cluster from production cluster

I’ve done it with a BAT data export and import. You can export all or some of the config and then you won’t need to reproduce your IP network. From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Lelio Fulgenzi Sent: 02 March 2015 10:02 AM To: Cisco VOIP Subject:

[cisco-voip] Smart Call Home

Is smart call home worth turning on in the UC 10.5 versions? I'm having a hard time seeing from the documentation if there is a lot of value to it. It's not clear to me either how much system information it sends to Cisco on a regular basis and whether we should have any privacy concerns with

Re: [cisco-voip] Imp service default domain

We changed it a while ago with no issues. I did it when our PCs were getting rebooted anyway so that ensured Jabber was restarted. I doubt that Jabber will recover without a restart. From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Erick Wellnitz Sent: 23 April 2015

Re: [cisco-voip] CUWL 9.x to CUWL 10.x

Our 9.x licenses were invalidated when we installed the 10.x licenses. I believe we had 60 days to get to 10.x. Not customer-friendly for sure. From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Charles Goldsmith Sent: 30 April 2015 8:53 AM To: gentoo Cc: voip puck

Re: [cisco-voip] PCD 10.5(3) and IMP 9x to 10x

We had an issue that caused our upgrade to fail: our admin group for application users on both CUCM and IMP had the same name. The DB migration to CUCM didn’t like that. Renaming the IMP group fixed that particular problem. I informed TAC but the engineer decided not to enter a bug for it.

Re: [cisco-voip] PCD 10.5(3) and IMP 9x to 10x

. There was a SQL error when it found the duplicate names. From: Anthony Holloway [mailto:avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com] Sent: 05 May 2015 12:17 PM To: Eric Pedersen; Brian Meade Cc: Cisco VoIP Group Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] PCD 10.5(3) and IMP 9x to 10x That's good to know Eric. Which admin

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM 8.1.3 Blocking inbound calls

Do you have a bug ID for this? We have Attendant Console and haven’t seen this. I’m curious what the conditions are. From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jason Aarons (AM) Sent: 12 May 2015 3:11 PM To: Brian Meade Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: Re:

Re: [cisco-voip] jabber dual domain question

. /dsprimary dnscmd . /recordadd _cisco-uds._tcp.xyz.com. @ SRV 0 0 8443 cucm1.xyz.com dnscmd . /recordadd _cisco-uds._tcp.xyz.com. @ SRV 0 0 8443 cucm2.xyz.com From: Erick Wellnitz [mailto:ewellnitzv...@gmail.com] Sent: 10 April 2015 9:24 AM To: Eric Pedersen Cc: Anthony Holloway; cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] off-net MGCP call preservation with subscriber reboot

If they are PRIs they will drop since the D-channel is backhauled to the CCM the gateway is registered to. From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Lelio Fulgenzi Sent: 05 June 2015 1:52 PM To: Brian Meade Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [cisco-voip]

Re: [cisco-voip] Changing DNS entries in Call Manager 9.1.2.10000-28

We switched to IP addresses for our CUCM server entries and haven’t had any application problems. Jabber appears to use the hostnames set in the “UC Server” settings not the System-Server settings. Windows accepts IP addresses in certificate Subject Alt Name attributes too. We had an issue at

Re: [cisco-voip] Jabber - WebEx integration query

: 02 June 2015 2:20 AM To: Eric Pedersen; James Buchanan Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] Jabber - WebEx integration query Thanks Eric, can you please send me some guidance for how to configure the CWMS for SSO ? Best Regards Ahmed Abd EL-Rahman Senior Network Engineer

[cisco-voip] Service parameters on CUCM upgrade

When CUCM changes service parameter default values between versions, should parameters get updated to the new defaults on upgrades (if they haven't been manually changed of course)? I was having a problem getting Conductor conferencing working and it was because the SIP incoming message maximum

Re: [cisco-voip] Digicert Wildcard cert

Digicert lets you put specific hosts into the SAN in addition to the wildcard. I haven't seen any other certificate provider with anything close to the flexibility of Digicert. I haven't tried them on CUCM but they work perfectly on VCS, even for the connection to WebEx. Eric From: cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] bandwidth restrictions for MRA clients - necessary or not?

But then, I don't want to impact quality for Jabber clients on wifi connections. I'm guessing that I might go with leaving device mobility out of the picture for now and ensuring video calling is disabled while on mobile networks. From: "Eric Pedersen&quo

Re: [cisco-voip] bandwidth restrictions for MRA clients - necessary or not?

Jabber apparently monitors packet loss and sets the video rate accordingly, which is why the quality starts out really low and them improves with the call. I don't think any of the phones do that, but I believe the 8845 maximum bandwidth is 2mpbs. From: cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco Spark detected as a virus - Artemis (McAfee 8.8.0 Signature 5/19/2016)

We don't use Spark but several versions of Jabber have been incorrectly identified by McAfee as Artemis (their heuristic engine). From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Lelio Fulgenzi Sent: 20 May 2016 7:30 AM To: Cisco VOIP

[cisco-voip] UC and Exchange 2016

Does anyone have IM configured for calendar integration with Exchange 2016? It's not listed as a compatible version with IM but I'm wondering if that's just a documentation oversight. The contents of this message may contain confidential and/or privileged subject matter. If this message has

Re: [cisco-voip] Conductor MRG on CUCM never register and rendezvous calls don´t work

There is a defect in CUCM 10.5 where the Conductor won't register if CUCM is configured to use HTTPS. I don't remember the details but it's related to certificate validation. We had to switch our CUCM configuration to use HTTP to communicate with Conductor. From: cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] dot1x multi domain phones prompt for login

We have ISE deployed and didn't find phone profiling to be 100% successful. We deployed LSCs to all our phones and use those for 802.1x authentication. From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Hendrix, Bill W. - US Sent: 18 September 2016 11:52 AM To:

Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco moth-balling CUE - Is Connection SRSV the answer?

I used SRSV a while ago for one of our remote sites. I found it much simpler to get up and running than CUE and you can use your centralized Exchange. IIRC you can send your voicemail pilot back to the gateway SRSV is registered to so all calls go to it. But it's been a really long time...

Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco moth-balling CUE - Is Connection SRSV the answer?

? Do you know if SRSV can operate while CUCM is up? The great thing about CUE, is that it operated while CUCM was up. Completely independent of Unity Connection. This means, I could schedule downtime for Connection and have an almost fully operational AA working. From: Eric Pedersen mailto:peders

[cisco-voip] Wrong ITL cert on subscribers

We had to rebuild our CUCM 12.5 publisher. That part went ok, but now the subscribers have an ITLRecovery certificate that differs from the pub and are giving out an ITL file signed with that certificate. The publisher has the old, correct certificate which is got with the restore, but it looks

Re: [cisco-voip] Suggestions on book on SIP protocol?

I have this book from a number of years ago and found it quite useful. I like having a resource that isn't Cisco-centric. SIP: Understanding the Session Initiation Protocol, Fourth edition: Johnston, Alan B.: 9781608078639: Amazon.com:

Re: [cisco-voip] 212areacode.com

gt; > Signed, Jenny > > Sent from my iPhone > > On May 13, 2022, at 11:41 AM, Eric Pedersen wrote: > >  > > CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the University of Guelph. > Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and > k

[cisco-voip] 212areacode.com

I've been asked to get some area code 212 numbers. Has anyone bought some from 212areacode.com and ported them to a VoIP service? They look legit to me. ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net

Re: [cisco-voip] 212areacode.com

On May 13, 2022, at 3:38 PM, Eric Pedersen wrote: > >  > > CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the University of Guelph. > Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and > know the content is safe. If in doubt, forward suspicious

[cisco-voip] Allstream

Does anyone have experience with Allstream? I have a SIP trunk ordered from them and the communication from them is absolutely terrible. I thought they were one of the better Canadian SIP providers. The engineers seem fine but the sales team just ignores emails. No order status emails, no support

Re: [cisco-voip] Specific Off-net Called Numbers Being Dropped When Called From Jabber

We have a sip provider whose SBC won’t accept calls with video codecs in the sdp. I created a cucm region with no video bandwidth and assigned it to the gateway to fix it. Eric On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 06:13 Gary Parker wrote: > Thanks Mark, that looks really promising, but I’m on 15.5 and