Re: [cisco-voip] Expressway Design for new startup

2016-06-06 Thread Ki Wi
Guys, any comment? Ideally going spark is the best but the lack of voice gateways/ direct sip trunk support seems to force us back to hybrid model? Regards, Ki Wi On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 3:49 PM, Ki Wi <kiwi.vo...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi James, > you are right regarding the phone

Re: [cisco-voip] Expressway Design for new startup

2016-06-06 Thread Ki Wi
. At least we can tell them that when using deskphone, quality is guarantee. Regards, Ki Wi On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 3:12 PM, James Buchanan <james.buchan...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > I don't believe that's the case. According to Cisco, you register the > phones directly to Spark

[cisco-voip] Expressway Design for new startup

2016-06-06 Thread Ki Wi
? Since they have small amount of users, having multiple clusters might not make sense and the users will be roaming across cluster often + I don't see any benefits by doing so? -- Regards, Ki Wi ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net

Re: [cisco-voip] Expressway Design for new startup

2016-06-06 Thread Ki Wi
han...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > I wonder if a cloud-based solution such as Spark wouldn't make more sense > than implementing an on-premise system. > > James > > On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 2:14 AM, Ki Wi <kiwi.vo...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi Group, >> I have th

[cisco-voip] Cisco UCM with Skype for Business

2016-04-06 Thread Ki Wi
way to achieve presence synchronization between UCM and Skype presence service? Assuming they are using the same URI ? + Able to leverage on UCM to receive and initial calls. Regards, Ki Wi ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net h

Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco UCM with Skype for Business

2016-04-06 Thread Ki Wi
Daniel, for 2 ways intra-domain federation. I suppose if covers scenario whereby some users are on Jabber and some users are on SfB as documented. For example user "Ki Wi, k...@mycompany.com" uses SfB clients and uses cisco hardphone. I answered on my hardphone. Will IM update SfB

Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco UCM with Skype for Business

2016-04-06 Thread Ki Wi
sway for free right? I saw on other threads here. Someone answered yes. Regards, Ki Wi On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 9:15 PM, Matt Slaga (AM) < matt.sl...@dimensiondata.com> wrote: > Another option, although not perfect, is using a hardware device like a > Kuandobox. > > > > ht

Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco UCM with Skype for Business

2016-04-07 Thread Ki Wi
ther device > that did not have the cert, login would fail. But more traditional 2FA > would use TOTP which can be integrated with both ADFS and OpenAM. > > > > On 2016-04-07 15:48, Ki Wi wrote: > > Daniel, > for 2 ways intra-domain federation. I suppose if cover

[cisco-voip] CUE Virtual

2017-03-19 Thread Ki Wi
that it have sufficient power to run CUE virtual. The VM indicates that it needs minimum 1Ghz but doesn't indicate the processor type... -- Regards, Ki Wi ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco

[cisco-voip] Mediasense Replacement

2017-04-16 Thread Ki Wi
Hi Group, Since Mediasense have announced EoS. Is there any Linux based voice recording system in the market? -- Regards, Ki Wi ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] Mediasense Replacement

2017-04-17 Thread Ki Wi
Doug > Anderson <doug.ander...@cdw.com> > *Date: *Tuesday, 18 April 2017 at 1:44 am > *To: *Anthony Holloway <avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com>, Ki Wi < > kiwi.vo...@gmail.com>, "cisco-voip@puck.nether.net" < > cisco-voip@puck.nether.net> > *Subject: *Re: [

[cisco-voip] E164 routing loop

2017-08-13 Thread Ki Wi
that matches the DID range and block it. This means that incoming dialed number will match to 4 dial-peers (100, 200, 250 and 300) After failing on 100 and 200, the call gets block on dial-peer 250. -- Regards, Ki Wi ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-

Re: [cisco-voip] E164 routing loop

2017-08-14 Thread Ki Wi
I think I got the answer. I suppose this problem is there since day 1. Never encounter this before as those dial-peer towards PSTN usually I will put 9T. In this specific gateway, it's .T . New learning experience for me. On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 1:22 PM, Ki Wi <kiwi.vo...@gmail.com>

Re: [cisco-voip] E164 routing loop

2017-08-13 Thread Ki Wi
at 09:09, Brian Meade <bmead...@vt.edu> wrote: > >> You can do things like "no voice hunt unassigned-number" and "no voice >> hunt invalid-number" on IOS to keep it from trying more dial-peers. >> >> On Sun, Aug 13, 2017 at 10:47 PM, Ki Wi <

[cisco-voip] CUE support for CUCM 11.5

2017-07-02 Thread Ki Wi
CUCM 11.5 . -- Regards, Ki Wi ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] LLQ Qn on policing

2017-06-02 Thread Ki Wi
gt;> a conform-action which just applies to burst traffic you can configure. >> There's no upper limit if you configure the exceed-action to remark and >> transmit. >> >> On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 2:29 AM, Ki Wi <kiwi.vo...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi Group,

[cisco-voip] LLQ Qn on policing

2017-06-01 Thread Ki Wi
is 1) policing only kicks in when there's congestion? 2) if the policing command is configured to remark traffic only (no drop) for violate action. What will happen? Traffic will still flow, no upper limit? Will it starve other policy map? -- Regards, Ki Wi

Re: [cisco-voip] Jabber/Apple IOS 11 - Push Notification

2017-09-21 Thread Ki Wi
anyone shed a light on this? Have i missed something? > > Thank you. > > JF > > > > ___ > cisco-voip mailing list > cisco-voip@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip > > -- Regards, Ki Wi ___

Re: [cisco-voip] OT: 4000 ISR and service containers...

2017-09-06 Thread Ki Wi
www.uoguelph.ca/ccs > Room 037, Animal Science and Nutrition Building > Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1 > > > ___ > cisco-voip mailing list > cisco-voip@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip > > -- Re

Re: [cisco-voip] SIP option ping prioritization

2017-08-27 Thread Ki Wi
Hi Saranyan, thanks! I would like to know how can I compose an access-list to detect SIP option ping and prioritize it. On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 11:20 AM, saranyan k <saranyan2...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Ki Wi, > > OPTIONS ping is a SIP message. Ideally the transport mode

[cisco-voip] SIP option ping prioritization

2017-08-27 Thread Ki Wi
ault. This make things more complex, I have no idea it is TCP or UDP or ??? With no access to customer network (unable to do wireshark), I would like to see if there's anyone having the experience to prioritize those SIP option ping packets? -- Regards, Ki Wi __

Re: [cisco-voip] SIP option ping prioritization

2017-08-29 Thread Ki Wi
roups. >> >> See here for a little more info on that: >> https://supportforums.cisco.com/t5/video-over-ip/sip- >> options-ping-and-session-server-group-on-dial-peer/td-p/2994584 >> >> >> On Sun, Aug 27, 2017 at 9:56 PM Ki Wi <kiwi.vo...@gmail.com> wrote:

Re: [cisco-voip] let's encrypt for local admin gui pages

2017-09-27 Thread Ki Wi
nd $42 usd recently to get a wildcard SSL (1 year) to solve all the trouble. I'm lazy. https://www.ssl2buy.com/alphassl-wildcard.php Regards, Ki Wi On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 8:58 AM, Nathan Reeves <nathan.a.ree...@gmail.com> wrote: > I've been using it on Lab boxes without issue.

Re: [cisco-voip] UC server performance and UCCX agent in reserve

2017-12-18 Thread Ki Wi
d , a couple of our agents (but not all) >>>> both have had their phones restart while in use, and today both had their >>>> agent go into Reserved state for a couple of minutes before finally >>>> connecting and allowing them service. Again an

Re: [cisco-voip] FXO hang due to connectivity loss?

2017-12-15 Thread Ki Wi
the gateway to end that leg of the call regardless of > SIP reachability. But I consider that a pretty big if! > > -mn > > *From:* cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] *On Behalf > Of *Ki Wi > *Sent:* December 13, 2017 12:34 AM > *To:* cisco-voip@puc

[cisco-voip] FXO hang due to connectivity loss?

2017-12-12 Thread Ki Wi
a disconnect tone is detected even there is a loss of connectivity to CUCM. -- Regards, Ki Wi ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

[cisco-voip] SBC and M-MOH

2018-06-06 Thread Ki Wi
to customer LAN) and CUCM sits in different site. In this case, how can I provide MOH to the SIP trunk provider? Unicast via G.711? Is there better option out there? I feels that in this case, it's wasting of bandwidth when all my regular on-net calls are using G.729 only. -- Regards, Ki Wi

[cisco-voip] BE6K Starter Pack behavior/limitation

2018-04-13 Thread Ki Wi
license? Can it be shared among the 2 clusters? Let's say 1 cluster will be using 45 CUWL standard licenses while another one use like 25 CUWL ? Will this lead to any license violation in the PLM? -- Regards, Ki Wi ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip

[cisco-voip] PCI DSS compliance for Cisco IPT/UCCX

2019-01-21 Thread Ki Wi
voice encryption? Turn on TLS v1.1 ? etc? -- Regards, Ki Wi ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

[cisco-voip] Call Quality for Cisco 7821

2018-12-13 Thread Ki Wi
for this purpose? -- Regards, Ki Wi ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] Phone Deprecation going forward

2019-01-03 Thread Ki Wi
Hi Lelio, great to hear that. I thought that there's some new announcement that Jabber inbound calls will stop working on iphone which I could have missed out. Regards, Ki Wi On Fri, Jan 4, 2019 at 12:44 PM Lelio Fulgenzi wrote: > Sorry, I do t think I answered your question. > > A

Re: [cisco-voip] Phone Deprecation going forward

2019-01-03 Thread Ki Wi
Hi Lelio, we don't have APNS enabled yet but users feedback that their iphone notification stopped working recently after upgrading to latest iOS software. Does that mean that even with APNS, only IM notification will come in, call notification will not? Regards, Ki Wi On Wed, Jan 2, 2019 at 2

Re: [cisco-voip] PCI DSS compliance for Cisco IPT/UCCX

2019-01-23 Thread Ki Wi
customer to create a standalone cluster just for UCCX else potentially it will cost them more $$ to enable end to end encryption on all existing sites. The PCI compliance consultant they have hired, recommended them to go digital phones or analogue phones which is kind of weird. Regards, Ki Wi

[cisco-voip] CUCM SU release cycle

2019-08-14 Thread Ki Wi
Hi Group, in the past , the SU release is every 6 months (usually longer than that, approximately twice a year maximum) but now Cisco is changing to every 2 months? Reference : Page 20 of the link https://www.ciscolive.com/c/dam/r/ciscolive/us/docs/2019/pdf/PSOCOL-1000.pdf -- Regards, Ki Wi

Re: [cisco-voip] Uplinx Report Tool?

2019-08-14 Thread Ki Wi
. Especially for overseas deployment where the lead engineer is in 1 location while we have a FE onsite. Typically this FE might not be voice trained so it take him a long time to read the step by step instructions. Whole UAT might take 8 to 12 hours to complete... Regards, Ki Wi On Sat, Aug 3, 2019