Re: [cisco-voip] Jabber for Windows 10.5 and LDAP searches not in E.164 format (Application Dial Rules)

I would do both. Correct the source, but make it work if they miss one. On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 1:54 PM, Jason Aarons (AM) jason.aar...@dimensiondata.com wrote: Customer mostly uses E.164 in CUCM 10.5. They added Jabber for Windows and some entries in LDAP like mobile phone are just area

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM 10.5.1 adding subscriber rebooted phones?

It happened to me. Cm 9.1.2 Sent from my iPhone +1 801 718 2308 On Nov 21, 2014, at 10:46 AM, Jason Aarons (AM) jason.aar...@dimensiondata.com wrote: I had a coworker tell me he added a subscriber during the day and all phones reset during the day. Perhaps this was ITL update? He

Re: [cisco-voip] Jabber (Everyone) without IM/Presence ?

Your looking for Jabber Phone mode. Some clients support it some don't. I believe we're still waiting for Mac phone mode. Normally when you say jabber for everyone your talking about free imp with no softphone. Softphone is always licensed. Sent from my iPhone On Nov 25, 2014, at 9:41 AM,

Re: [cisco-voip] Jabber (Everyone) without IM/Presence ?

Licensing and making things work are completely separate. So as long as you leave the device anonymous/public space a user will not move up to the higher tier of licensing. From: Lelio Fulgenzi [mailto:le...@uoguelph.ca] Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2014 12:13 PM To: NateCCIE Cc: cisco

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM5.1: Phone MacAddr + Directory Number/PT (Bulk not working)

run sql SELECT device.name as devicename, dnorpattern, routepartition.name as partition, numplanindex from devicenumplanmap join numplan on fknumplan = numplan.pkid join routepartition on routepartition.pkid = numplan.fkroutepartition join device on device.pkid = fkdevice I added line

Re: [cisco-voip] Expressway - 3rd Party Border Recommendation

Expressway is the first thought, then CUBE Lineside proxy would be where to go for 3rd party. https://ciscocollab.wordpress.com/2014/04/08/cube-sip-lineside-phone-vpn-configuration/ From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Brian Meade Sent: Monday,

Re: [cisco-voip] CFA/SNR fails with 503 Request Timeout at Proxy...

You just say add instead of modify. Now if you add when there is already one then there will be two. So I delete then add so there is always the one I want. Sent from my iPhone +1 801 718 2308 On Dec 13, 2014, at 2:47 PM, Jonathan Charles jonv...@gmail.com wrote: The problem from

[cisco-voip] Expressway 8.5 is out

Talking about stuff sneaking out, expressway 8.5 is on CCO. Here is the release notes: http://www.cisco.com/c/dam/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/expressway/release_note/Cisco-Expressway-Release-Note-X8-5.pdf The Expressway can now work with the Cisco DX Series endpoints, and with the

Re: [cisco-voip] Expressway 8.5 is out

It seems UDS isn’t that great when pictures are in AD, for user info, it should be the same? From: Josh Warcop [mailto:j...@warcop.com] Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2014 4:30 PM To: Lelio Fulgenzi; NateCCIE Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] Expressway 8.5 is out

Re: [cisco-voip] CUBE across VRFs

Really you only talk to one or two IP address at the Service provider, a default route out the internet/SP interface is less than typically critical. From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Norton, Mike Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2015 3:05 PM To: Erick

Re: [cisco-voip] Recommendation For Certificate Provider For Jabber/Presence Use

, 2015 10:25 AM To: NateCCIE Cc: Cisco VoIP Group Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Recommendation For Certificate Provider For Jabber/Presence Use On 5 Feb 2015, at 16:51, NateCCIE natec...@gmail.com wrote: Use DIGICERT! You can get a wildcard cert from them, and use it over and over. So you just

Re: [cisco-voip] Recommendation For Certificate Provider For Jabber/Presence Use

Use DIGICERT! You can get a wildcard cert from them, and use it over and over. So you just generate the cert based on the CSR from each app and it loads right in. Works great on CUCM, CUC, CUP, Expressway! -Original Message- From: cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] 2911 not releasing IP's

Sh ip dhcp conflict Sent from my iPhone +1 801 718 2308 On Feb 11, 2015, at 12:46 PM, norm.nichol...@kitchener.ca norm.nichol...@kitchener.ca wrote: Any one seen this problem before ? Feb 11 18:24:43.828: DHCPD: subnet [155.194.191.65,155.194.191.94] in address pool

Re: [cisco-voip] Unity connection - Voicemail playback

Ryan, When did CUC start to allow more than two nodes in a cluster? Jose, You can go into the unity connection serviceability and click stop taking calls Then there are no configuration changes to deal with, just turn it back on when the link is stable. -Nate From: cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] Auto-Create Conference Call

Can't do it natively, but there are apps that can do think kind of thing. I think singlewire is one. Sent from my iPhone On Feb 12, 2015, at 2:43 PM, Gary Parker g.j.par...@lboro.ac.uk wrote: Evening all, I’ve been given a requirement by a new group of users who will shortly be moving

Re: [cisco-voip] Jabber over 443 and not 8443?

I've done a few expressway MRAs, and what you ask is something I wouldn't even attempt. There seems to be a lot of hard-coded magic that happens when the client detects collaboration edge. From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Josh Warcop Sent: Monday,

Re: [cisco-voip] J4W cannot communicate with server

In my testing Jabber doesn't use the hosts file. I believe this is because it needs to determine inside vs expressway. Sent from my iPhone +1 801 718 2308 On Jan 8, 2015, at 3:30 PM, Dana Tong dana_t...@bridgepoint.com.au wrote: Is there any way to easily read the logs in the PRT for

Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco 8800/DX phones and MRA?

In X8.5 it's feature preview. So you can now. Sent from my iPhone +1 801 718 2308 On Feb 13, 2015, at 9:08 AM, Kevin Przybylowski kev...@advancedtsg.com wrote: I know this has been on the table for a while – has anyone heard any information on when we can utilize hard phones via the

Re: [cisco-voip] Unity Connection 8 Auto Attendant exclusion

Try changing his transfer extension in unity connection. On Feb 5, 2015, at 11:46 AM, Brian Palmer bpal...@ctipath.com wrote: I have a CEO that wants anybody using the directory lookup from unity connection(last name, first name) to find him to be directed to his secretary while also

Re: [cisco-voip] (no subject)

I wonder what the difference is between expanding and installing on 120G from the beginning, since there is the report of it only growing the common partition. On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 9:03 AM, Tim Frazee tfra...@gmail.com wrote: the resize cop file is for 9x only, 10 has it built in. I'm

Re: [cisco-voip] Win 7 64-bit not supported with CUCM 10.5

No one really uses the 64 bit browsers. This is browsers not Oss. https://www.java.com/en/download/faq/java_win64bit.xml From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jason Aarons (AM) Sent: Monday, March 16, 2015 7:28 AM To: cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] Extension that hangs up on the user?

I have a broken IP phone that it answers the call and clears it on any line on the phone. It was really fun when it shared lines with 15 other phones. You just need one of those. :) -Original Message- From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Daniel Pagan

Re: [cisco-voip] 3rd Party PBX integration

Dialogic is the oem. Nothing special about buying them through Cisco. Sent from my iPhone On Mar 26, 2015, at 9:14 PM, Lelio Fulgenzi le...@uoguelph.ca wrote: http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/unified-communications/unity/end_of_life_notice_c51-573528.html Sent from my

Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco custom exsi or vmware standard image for UCS C240

It comes with the drivers. From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Rajkumar Had av Sent: Monday, March 2, 2015 8:29 AM To: Kevin Przybylowski Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco custom exsi or vmware standard image for UCS C240

Re: [cisco-voip] Understanding SIP Traces document

I did not get to it, and I am a CCIE and a partner. My guess is I am not as cool as Jonathan. From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jonathan Charles Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2015 9:52 AM To: Ed Leatherman Cc: Cisco VOIP Subject: Re: [cisco-voip]

Re: [cisco-voip] SRV records for Jabber/Telepresence/MRA

Cuplogin is deprecated and only needed with old clients. Get rid Of that. And you are correct, you don't need the uds or Cuplogin externally. Xmpp Federation will not work through expressway with different internal and external domains. Michael white has a blog out there on split domain mra.

Re: [cisco-voip] SRV records for Jabber/Telepresence/MRA

back in resolved the problem. On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 2:44 PM, NateCCIE natec...@gmail.com wrote: Cuplogin is deprecated and only needed with old clients. Get rid Of that. And you are correct, you don't need the uds or Cuplogin externally. Xmpp Federation will not work through expressway

Re: [cisco-voip] FXS voltages / POTS compatibility

Either opx lite cards or use some stuff from here: http://www.sandman.com/loop.html Sent from my iPhone On Feb 28, 2015, at 5:47 PM, chris tknch...@gmail.com wrote: Hello We have a location with a 2800 acting as a voice gateway where we have 2 FXS voice ports going to an alarm

Re: [cisco-voip] Expressway CE issue

You need to use the newer docs. The port list changed for media. From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Erick Wellnitz Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2015 6:50 PM To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: [cisco-voip] Expressway CE issue Not a security or a

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM 10.5 MoH

I believe it's live audio that he really wants. VMware you have no more USB sound card. Sent from my iPhone On Apr 21, 2015, at 1:55 PM, Anthony Holloway avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com wrote: I'm confused as to why you have to give the SIP trunk an MRGL which has an MRG set for

[cisco-voip] Rdirecting number over SIP PSTN,

Guys, I have an interesting situation. I am running calls through a sip profile to set the redirecting party on the call to be able to do TEHO out the SIP trunk that has virtual trunk groups to many Rate Centers. It works great. However, we have a few numbers that are called that we get

Re: [cisco-voip] Unity Connection Voice Mail Distribution Lists that I can be able to send “Intercluster” to other locations or regions (ie. Latin America to North America, North America to LA or LA t

Plus there is http networking. But with the old networking you get 10 intrasite + 10 intrasite= 20 intersite. On Apr 14, 2015, at 4:08 PM, Mehtab Shinwari mshinw...@fidelus.com wrote: image001.png (this is from a CUC 10.x doc) Hope this helps J Mehtab Shinwari | CCNP-V/RS,

Re: [cisco-voip] UCCX Upgrade question

TAC will get you the ISO if you ask nice/ push hard enough. Especially if you get a Cisco employee and not an outsource engineer. Sent from my iPhone On May 21, 2015, at 2:40 PM, Justin Steinberg jsteinb...@gmail.com wrote: that's not possible afaik On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 9:25 PM, Ryan

Re: [cisco-voip] 3905 dial tone problem

I always thought dialtone on a ip phone was a wav file, part of the locale that is downloaded to the phone. From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Ryan Huff Sent: Thursday, August 20, 2015 4:42 PM To: Jason Aarons, (AM) jason.aar...@dimensiondata.com;

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM 10.x and RightFax SR140 v10

I wonder if you have prack enabled if it is a SIP trunk so that early media can be cut through before the connect. Sent from my iPhone On Aug 18, 2015, at 3:52 PM, Daniel Pagan dpa...@fidelus.com wrote: there’s no way to inject the CNG tone Sorry - I should be more specific. What I mean

Re: [cisco-voip] TEHO using SIP trunk ringback issue

I think incoming h.323 dial-peer. http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/voice/h323/22983-ringback.html From: Abebe Amare [mailto:abu...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, July 24, 2015 7:58 AM To: NateCCIE Cc: cisco voip Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] TEHO using SIP trunk ringback issue Hi

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM translation pattern postfix

I don't think so, because the XXX can only be at the end of a TP called party mask. From: Steve Siltman [mailto:steve.silt...@assurant.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2015 10:18 AM To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Cc: natec...@gmail.com Subject: Re: CUCM translation pattern postfix Hi Nate,

Re: [cisco-voip] TEHO using SIP trunk ringback issue

That is it. Just do it on both sides. Do you have progress_ind alert enable 8 progress_ind progress enable 8 progress_ind connect enable 8 on your h.323 dial-peers? From: Abebe Amare [mailto:abu...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, July 24, 2015 7:18 AM To: NateCCIE Cc: cisco voip Subject

Re: [cisco-voip] TEHO using SIP trunk ringback issue

Is PRACK enabled on the sip trunk? From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Abebe Amare Sent: Friday, July 24, 2015 1:54 AM To: cisco voip Subject: [cisco-voip] TEHO using SIP trunk ringback issue Hi, The call flow is like this: CUCM cluster 1

Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco 7912 Registration issues

I was just thinking this sounded familiar, and then you went and linked to my post from 2012! The 7912 SIP grabs a different configuration filename from what I remember. That is why I changed the SIP firmware to SCCP, so that if for some reason the phone decides to go SIP, it will be

Re: [cisco-voip] Digicert Wildcard certificates

use their wildcard certificates on all of our UC servers. From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Heim, Dennis Sent: 15 July 2015 8:28 AM To: Ian Anderson; NateCCIE; Cisco VOIP Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Digicert Wildcard certificates I’ve

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM translation pattern postfix digits

:27 PM, Ryan Huff ryanh...@outlook.com wrote: Nate, I am not by my Linux machine (refuse to use winblows) to vet this but could you do: *5XXX with a CPTM of XXX3101 with a prefix of 8? Thanks, Ryan Original Message From: NateCCIE natec...@gmail.com Sent

Re: [cisco-voip] Digicert Wildcard certificates

On 16 July 2015 at 02:35, NateCCIE natec...@gmail.com mailto:natec...@gmail.com wrote: Most of the time wildcard certs mean you have a CSR and a private key generated by something, and then you upload the private key and the public key to lots of servers. The application would need to be able

Re: [cisco-voip] Digicert Wildcard certificates

Ian On 5 Feb 2015, at 16:51, NateCCIE nateccie at gmail.com wrote: Use DIGICERT! You can get a wildcard cert from them, and use it over and over. So you just generate the cert based on the CSR from each app and it loads right in. Works great on CUCM, CUC, CUP, Expressway

Re: [cisco-voip] ISR 4431 - Need to configure "clock source internal" on PRI interface , get error

Ryan, This doc and sample config seems to only show how to do normal user side & network clocking. When doing network side isdn to a pbx, you have to provide them the clock, I like Brian have not figured out that part of the 4K voodoo. Sent from my iPhone > On Oct 27, 2015, at 7:23 PM, Ryan

Re: [cisco-voip] LDAP custom filter for ipPhone field

I completely second the proposal to use +E.164 in directories. What I haven’t figured out what the right thing to do for non-DID extensions. From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Anthony Holloway Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2015 7:59 PM To: John Snow

Re: [cisco-voip] Expressway ?'s

But you could point the expressway c to a special dns server for just it that has the srv record. ;) Sent from my iPhone > On Nov 10, 2015, at 6:14 AM, Ed Leatherman wrote: > > Followup - > > Not possible how I'm trying to get around this; > > After the client goes

Re: [cisco-voip] CDR on CM 10.5.2.12901-1

You did the normal thing of restarting the cdr repository service under network services? From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Scott Voll Sent: Thursday, October 08, 2015 12:05 PM To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: [cisco-voip] CDR on CM

Re: [cisco-voip] Using speed dials to access features

Or a service URL that calls something that does this, but if I was a user I would expect the light to light if CFA was controlled by that button and enabled. But that would be hard :) Sent from my iPhone > On Oct 8, 2015, at 1:00 PM, Ryan Huff wrote: > > I should

Re: [cisco-voip] Question about Local Route Group feature

Yep, it will work just like that. From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Ed Leatherman Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2015 1:15 PM To: Cisco VOIP cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: [cisco-voip] Question about Local Route Group feature Hello! I actually

Re: [cisco-voip] Upgrading CUCM from 8.5 to 10.5

I believe the installs have to be on a NFS share for VMware. Upgrades are just sftp from the cucm side. Sent from my iPhone. > On Sep 14, 2015, at 1:37 PM, Daniel Pagan wrote: > > I’m digging up this old thread once again. > > With PCD v11 released, it’s great to see

Re: [cisco-voip] UCCX 10.6(1) SU1 CAD Upgrade Warning

I am hoping that you can upgrade from 10.6.1 su1 to 11. Do you know of that will also be permitted? Sent from my iPhone > On Sep 30, 2015, at 8:49 PM, Abhiram Kramadhati (akramadh) > wrote: > > CSCuw49432 filed to include 10.6(1) in supported upgrade path > > Working to

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM Native Presence (BLF/SD) populating Directories / Call Lists

Do you have the enterprise parameter "BLF for call lists" enabled? From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jeffrey Girard Sent: Tuesday, December 01, 2015 6:20 PM To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: [cisco-voip] CUCM Native Presence (BLF/SD) populating

[cisco-voip] CUCM/Unity and chrome

I have been using chrome for all of my version 10+ CUCM and Unity admin for a while now. It has been great Today on both of my computers, the drop downs are not appearing in chrome. Anyone else having problems with chrome today? -Nate ___ cisco-voip

[cisco-voip] GDPR/ILS and URIs

All, Where to GDPR learned URIs get put? The “Partitions for Learned Numbers and Patterns” does not have a partition selection for URIs, and it is not using the enterprise parameter “Directory URI Alias Partition” -Nate ___ cisco-voip mailing

Re: [cisco-voip] Recommendations Admin Phone

Or new school Jabber Presence would also do this. From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of James Buchanan Sent: Wednesday, January 6, 2016 7:36 AM To: David Zhars Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Recommendations Admin

Re: [cisco-voip] Jabber phone mode outbound calls issue

What is the outbound device/trunk/protocol? From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of abbas wali Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2015 10:13 AM To: 'Ryan Huff' ; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Jabber phone mode outbound

Re: [cisco-voip] Old phone models dropped from CUCM 11.5

Yeah, you wonder why it took so long. I will stop doing Cisco Communications Manager when they stop supporting my favorite phone, the 7911. I do wonder what happens to Syn-Apps’ SA-Announce software. They use VIP30 virtual phones, which I don’t like anyways because it takes a UCL ENH

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM 11.5 Upgrade from 11.0 Requires PUT?

I have upgraded a few systems to 11.5. No new license, but the software is crap. I already have 3 bugs found in the first week. One of them is you cannot import phones via BAT, the other two are ccmadmin showing bad stuff, like the device model enum instead of the model name in device

Re: [cisco-voip] UCCX - Need help with SQL CLI command to gather some system info about the UCCX system.

Uplinx? -Original Message- From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Brian V Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2016 10:19 AM To: Cisco VOIP Subject: [cisco-voip] UCCX - Need help with SQL CLI command to gather some system info about the

Re: [cisco-voip] Max length for analogue

http://www.sandman.com/LongLoop.html Sandman is the place to go when you have old school analog telcom problems. Sent from my iPhone > On Jun 22, 2016, at 1:50 PM, Louis Koekemoer (ZA) > wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > What would be the maximum length one

Re: [cisco-voip] Bulk ITL Eraser...

Open the bank vault, It’s expensive. But a life saver. They have an installer edition that is for partners and the like, you license it by the largest cluster you want to talk to. This is UnifiedFx phone view that I speak of. Uplinx also has a product, but I have not tired it, but

Re: [cisco-voip] UPPERCASE lowercase host names

Uccx lowercase is required. Be aware that the field values (namely hostname and passwords) that you enter while you are running the installation program are case sensitive. Hostname must be in lower case, and the character limit is 24 characters.

Re: [cisco-voip] cucm9 insert Local enduser via bat AD sync enable

CUCM 9 allows local users even with LDAP integration. From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of abbas Wali Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2016 11:38 AM To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: [cisco-voip] cucm9 insert Local enduser via bat AD sync enable hi

Re: [cisco-voip] dial-peer pointing secondary IP address

Generally, BINDS on a multi-interface CUBE are not friendly. It is much better to let the router use the egress interface as the source IP address. I am not aware of a way to bind to a secondary IP, but I would think that if the secondary IP is on a different subnet, it would automatically

Re: [cisco-voip] UPPERCASE lowercase host names

it should be uppercase. So now I am very particular about making sure domains are lowercase. Hostnames, not so much. -Nate From: avhollo...@gmail.com [mailto:avhollo...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Anthony Holloway Sent: Thursday, February 11, 2016 9:30 AM To: NateCCIE <natec...@gmail.

Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco 4331 Voice router

Main thing is the DSP for the T1 has to be physically on the T1 NIM. From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jose Colon II Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2016 3:47 PM To: Cisco VOIP Subject: [cisco-voip] Cisco 4331 Voice router I

Re: [cisco-voip] UCS move VMs to new server

‐4120 Ext 56354 > le...@uoguelph.ca > www.uoguelph.ca/ccs > Room 037, Animal Science and Nutrition Building > Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1 > > From: "NateCCIE" <natec...@gmail.com> > To: "Reto Gassmann" <v...@mrga.ch>, cisco-voip@puck.nether.net >

Re: [cisco-voip] UCS move VMs to new server

Enable ssh on both host, then do a SCP from one to the other. PUSH: scp -rp CMPub root@172.29.1.111:/vmfs/volumes/datastore1 PULL: scp -rp root@172.29.1.11:/vmfs/volumes/datastore1/CMSub1a . From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Reto Gassmann

Re: [cisco-voip] UCS move VMs to new server

The easy answer to the license, is demo mode. Take off the license, and it will run in evaluation mode for up to 60 days. Eval mode gives you full feature capacities. Add it to vCenter, do the move, then put the license back on. -Nate From: cisco-voip

[cisco-voip] CUCM 11 and Jabber certificates

All, So CUCM 11 adds https download of TFTP files over port 6972, and jabber wants to validate that cert. The good news is it uses the CUCM tomcat cert. The bad news is restarting TFTP and/or Tomcat do not restart port 6972. There is a defect about this CSCuy12120, you get to

Re: [cisco-voip] [cisco-VoIP] UCCE agents on wireless IP Communicator?

But I have yet to see a 7925 deployment that the end users are happy with. It is seemingly impossible for the wireless guys to get it perfect. Sent from my iPhone > On May 12, 2016, at 10:29 AM, Ryan Ratliff (rratliff) > wrote: > > I’ll take a slight issue with the

Re: [cisco-voip] SIP door phone with video camera

2n Helios IP. I also think there is couple of new mfgs to the video ip door intercom market like axis, but 2n is good stuff. Sent from my iPhone > On May 17, 2016, at 6:53 AM, Ed Leatherman wrote: > > Anyone seen a product that does this reasonably well with CUCM 10+?

Re: [cisco-voip] changing OVA sizing

I believe there is a bug that says if you had two disks before the DRS you have to have two after. Sent from my iPhone > On May 2, 2016, at 12:53 PM, Lelio Fulgenzi wrote: > > > I migrated an IM v9 cluster from physical to virutal and ran into an error > on the DRS

Re: [cisco-voip] changing OVA sizing

Fulgenzi <le...@uoguelph.ca> Cc: NateCCIE <natec...@gmail.com>; cisco-voip voyp list <cisco-voip@puck.nether.net> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] changing OVA sizing >From what I understand you’ve got 2 options. The first is install the smaller >OVA, and manually adjust vDisk

Re: [cisco-voip] Authenticating sip trunk to ITSP from CUBE?

BINDs on CUBEs are evil. It will use the egress interface automatically without binds, and as you have found, you cannot change binds with calls up. From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Nick Barnett Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2016 8:32 AM To: Brian Meade

Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco CUCM 11.5(1) ?

f RTMT CUCM 11.5” Thanks, -Nate From: Justin Steinberg [mailto:jsteinb...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, July 25, 2016 2:52 PM To: NateCCIE <natec...@gmail.com> Cc: Heim, Dennis <dennis.h...@wwt.com>; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco CUCM 11.5(1) ? Nate do

Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco CUCM 11.5(1) ?

I haven't had problems with Certs on my 11.5 clusters. But I think I did all of the Certs when it was running v11. Was yours a fresh 11.5? And what do you mean by CUCM certificate? Call manager or tomcat? I have had plenty of other bugs opened. Way to many, seems like a lot more than other

Re: [cisco-voip] Jabber support for Extension Mobility - Any other Solutions out there

Cisco doesn't seem to care about shared lines, if they are not registered. You can login to the EM profile when at the desk, then logout. Then you can login to jabber when remote. Just as long as you're not in both you should be ok. Thanks, -Nate On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 8:35 AM, Max Harmony

Re: [cisco-voip] Moving calls to/from jabber apps

I would be astonished if hold/resume did not work. Sent from my iPhone > On Feb 18, 2017, at 2:30 PM, Lelio Fulgenzi wrote: > > So, if someone answers a Jabber call on their mobile phone (via jabber > client) and walks into their office and wants to continue the call on

Re: [cisco-voip] Teleconferencing question

Look at the shire micro flex advance ceiling mount. http://www.shure.com/americas/microflex-advance Watch the demo videos and be amazed. Sent from my iPhone > On Feb 13, 2017, at 10:37 AM, Ben Amick wrote: > > Read below for my initial thoughts, but I just did a google

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM Upgrade 10.0 to 11.5 only via PCD?

The docs are pretty clear no upgrading with or without PCD from 10.0. You can do a PCD migration from 10.0 to 11.5, but that is a different paradigm.

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM CAC Locations Usage Report

Isn't LBM for syncing to VCS? Sent from my iPhone > On Aug 30, 2016, at 4:31 PM, Anthony Holloway > wrote: > > Yeah, I'm also aware of the perform logging, and I'm not a fan of it. From > back when I did it on UCCX to trend JVM Heap usage, it was a pain in

Re: [cisco-voip] CCX 11.5 Upgrade Issues

...@heliontechnologies.com] Sent: Sunday, October 23, 2016 9:16 AM To: NateCCIE <natec...@gmail.com>; 'Ryan Huff' <ryanh...@outlook.com> Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] CCX 11.5 Upgrade Issues We use our AD CA for the certs and setting that up to do EC certs is not a tiny

Re: [cisco-voip] CCX 11.5 Upgrade Issues

http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/customer-collaboration/unified-con tact-center-express/200651-UCCX-Version-11-5-Prerelease-Field-Commu.html All of the 11.5 stuff seems to have the ecdsa certs. Digicert issues them just fine on their wildcard cert. From: cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco 8821 registration problems

I do, just tried it on Wednesday, but I have not figured out why it's not working. I am running 11.5SU1+ES From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Taylor, Matthew Sent: Friday, October 28, 2016 4:34 PM To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: [cisco-voip]

Re: [cisco-voip] Are there any gotchas to watch out for switching to FQDN server names from IP address server names?

A reboot does work. What the deal is the new https version of tftp (port 6972) does not restart with the service restart. So it continues to use the old cert. But it does stop and start with a service deactivation and reactivation. Before cucm 11 the tftp over http was only plain text (port

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM Patch Insight

I would wait for SU2 at this point. It will be soon. From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jeffrey McHugh Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2017 8:53 AM To: Tim Franklin ; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM Patch

Re: [cisco-voip] Jabber/CIPC and QoS

Or take the most approach of do nothing. My personal favorite is to use codecs where QoS matters less, like iLBC, OPUS, etc. So many business are getting rid of the QoS capable WAN and just doing VPNs, even if they have fancy names that make it sound better than public internet. Sent from my

Re: [cisco-voip] CUBE call authorization?

Dial peer groups don't work like you think they would. The round robin between all of the dial peers on the outbound side, with no looking at the destination pattern. What I have settled on is using COR to restrict the dial peers. As with dial peers groups above, and always, inbound dial peer

Re: [cisco-voip] Automating association devices and profiles to PG_User application user?

You can do a simple SQL insert. This is a base Query I have used to add all hard phones to an app user, that aren’t already associated to the user (for apps like phoneview) Add all phones to an app user: INSERT INTO ApplicationUserDeviceMap (fkdevice,

Re: [cisco-voip] Call Forwarding on secondary lines in 11.5 with 8851?

8851s do it just fine. From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jason Aarons (Americas) Sent: Wednesday, August 9, 2017 10:31 AM To: cisco-voip (cisco-voip@puck.nether.net) Subject: [cisco-voip] Call Forwarding on secondary lines

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM 11.5 Tomcat Service SSL Certificate Issue

Are you using cuplogin or cisco-uds for discovery now? If your UC services or system/server is not fqdn and is IP address then the client will complains about the cert unless the ip is listed as a SAN. If cup login make sure your tftp server is fqdn over in IM Sent from my iPhone > On May

Re: [cisco-voip] Migrating a Cisco 2901 to a Cisco 4321

TDM DSPs on the 4ks have to be on the NIM because there is no shared TDM clocking backplane like there is on the ISRs/ISR G2. Dspfarm stuff can use extra dsps on a NIM and the motherboard DSPs can only be used for dspfarm tasks. Sent from my iPhone > On May 12, 2017, at 1:35 PM, Jose Colon

Re: [cisco-voip] Migrating a Cisco 2901 to a Cisco 4321

ecificity comes into play; the NIM > conversation I thought I was participating in was an extension of a convo > this AM, regarding a T1 PRI, in which those DSP are reserved for TDM only, > and not shareable to the backplane or vice a versa. > > Thanks, > > Ryan > > On

Re: [cisco-voip] um, where'd the scheduled backups go in PLM

I have removed all of the standalone PLM/ELMs from my customers. It just didn't make sense to have to worry about another box. I never found a use case that having a separate box actually made a difference. -Original Message- From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net]

Re: [cisco-voip] UCCx SSO

Going to try one this week. Sent from my iPhone > On May 16, 2017, at 2:19 PM, Scott Voll wrote: > > Anyone have SSO working with UCCx 11.5su1? > > Have had a TAC case open for a while and can't get it fixed. Just wondering > if anyone else has it working? CM / UC /

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM 11.5 Tomcat Service SSL Certificate Issue

I don't think you can upload a cert unless there is an active CSR for it. Sent from my iPhone > On May 16, 2017, at 2:12 PM, Brian Meade wrote: > > You can re-install the same certs. Just make sure to do the trusts, Root then > Intermediate then do the server cert and

Re: [cisco-voip] using two 3945s for SRST during upgrades - how to create voip dial-peer statements without causing a loop?

You can use COR to limit the inbound dial-peer on the router from seeing the outbound dial-peer that goes to the other SRST box. Easy peasy. -Nate -Original Message- From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Lelio Fulgenzi Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2017

Re: [cisco-voip] T1 PRI configuration on 2921 not matching startup config

The router gets the whole config snip it CUCM thinks it needs via TFTP. If you don’t want cucm to configure the ports, then you don’t put a config on the ports in CUCM. I agree with Evgeny, it looks like the router is short DSPs for the PRIs. -Nate From: cisco-voip

  1   2   >