Re: [cisco-voip] 5 digit and 10 digit dialing

2018-04-13 Thread Anthony Holloway
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net> > *Sent:* Thursday, April 12, 2018 12:48 PM > *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] 5 digit and 10 digit dialing > > Re-reading my email, I realize I have at least one typo. I used 6120 as > an example extension, and I should have used a fourth digit b

Re: [cisco-voip] 5 digit and 10 digit dialing

2018-04-12 Thread Carlo Calabrese via cisco-voip
; Cisco VoIP Group <cisco-voip@puck.nether.net> Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2018 12:48 PM Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] 5 digit and 10 digit dialing Re-reading my email, I realize I have at least one typo.  I used 6120 as an example extension, and I should have used a fourth digit between 2-9 t

Re: [cisco-voip] 5 digit and 10 digit dialing

2018-04-12 Thread Brian Meade
Seems like I have this discussion with a customer at least once a month. Sometimes I think some of these cloud-providers offering no off-hook dialing have done it right, but I'm an off-hook dialer myself. On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 1:43 PM, Anthony Holloway < avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com> wrote:

Re: [cisco-voip] 5 digit and 10 digit dialing

2018-04-12 Thread Anthony Holloway
It's surprising to me, how many people I hear these days, asking to remove the PSTN access code (typically a 9 in the US), but then still want intra- and inter-site abbreviated dialing habits to be supported. The usual defense is: "I don't have to dial a 9 on my cell phone." Though, these same

Re: [cisco-voip] 5 digit and 10 digit dialing

2018-04-12 Thread Brian Meade
Can't you just add those partitions to the existing CSS and make sure Urgent Priority isn't checked on the 5-digit extensions? On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 10:52 AM, Carlo Calabrese via cisco-voip < cisco-voip@puck.nether.net> wrote: > Users are doing 10 digit dialing so any calls local or long