ipsec and nat [7:12825]

2001-07-18 Thread Fly Ers
Anyone confirm whether pix, concentrator or ipsec router has the ability to nat over ipsec? i know that I can nat everything on a router behind one of these devices. Thanks. _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at

ipsec and nat [7:12827]

2001-07-18 Thread Fly Ers
I just found the answer. http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/759/ipj_3-4/ipj_3-4_nat.html _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com Message Posted at:

Re: ipsec and nat [7:12825]

2001-07-18 Thread Fly Ers
can do it using udp port forwarding but this only work if you're using Cisco's vpn client. Fly Ers wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Anyone confirm whether pix, concentrator or ipsec router has the ability to nat over ipsec? i know that I can nat ev

GRE over IPSec Tunnel [7:9257]

2001-06-20 Thread Fly Ers
Have IPSec tunnel between PIX 515 and VPN3000. attempting to establish GRE tunnel over ipsec between to cisco router endpoints. the tunnel appears to be up but can not pass traffic accross. Using this for broadcast traffic, routing updates, netbios. Please advise Thanks

Re: Cisco view Problems [7:39764]

2002-03-28 Thread Fly Ers
We had the same issue, had to upgrade java on the cisco works server. From: maamun Murangwa Reply-To: maamun Murangwa To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Cisco view Problems [7:39764] Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2002 10:56:20 -0500 Hi all, I'm having a problem with viewing devices using cisco view, i get

RE: BGP question [7:40525]

2002-04-05 Thread Fly Ers
aren't the 2 7206 dual homed, 2 connections to each ISP? why not run hsrp on the 7206 and let those routers make decisions for all internal routers? From: Ouellette, Tim Reply-To: Ouellette, Tim To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: BGP question [7:40525] Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2002 18:39:17 -0500

Re: Cisco VPN Client PIX [7:40670]

2002-04-09 Thread Fly Ers
I didn't see an update on this, but unless there has been an upgrade to the linksys, it will only pass 1 Ipsec tunnel. If there is an existing connection, and another is attempted, the original one will be dropped. there are some higher end (higher priced) firewall devices, that will pass

Re: acess level 15 - [7:41251]

2002-04-12 Thread Fly Ers
Are you using the default username and password (admin/admin) From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: acess level 15 - [7:41251] Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 21:59:06 -0400 HI, 1. Getting an error while trying to use browser to configure vpn conc.3000

Re: Cisco VPN Client [7:19858]

2001-09-16 Thread Fly Ers
George, do you have control of the vpn3000? the split tunnel list on the concentrator should be setup to with only the networks accessible from ipsec tunnel. otherwise, all ip traffic will be sent through the tunnel. From: George Kallingal Reply-To: George Kallingal To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

multiple concurrent IPSec sessions cable/dsl at home [7:22157]

2001-10-04 Thread Fly Ers
we currently have many vpn users from there homes, some have needs for multiple connections. While the Netgear, SMC devices work great for internet connectivity and add some layers of protection, their lack of support for multiple connections has me searching for another device. Have you

vpn client, windows 98 and RSA ACE [7:26149]

2001-11-13 Thread Fly Ers
we are using vpn client (3.0.6 rel 2 and 3.1.1) to connect to vpn 3000 concentrator with RSA ACE server 5.0 authenticating the connections. put windows 98 in the mix and there tends to be problems. #1 problem - VPN Subsystem unavailable - cannot make IPSec Connection #2 problem - VPN client

Re: how to disable NAT in PIX firewall (both insid [7:29405]

2001-12-18 Thread Fly Ers
config looks correct. check with your next hop router outside of the firewall to ensure that routes for your inside network are available. From: Brian Whalen Reply-To: Brian Whalen To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: how to disable NAT in PIX firewall (both insid [7:29405] Date: Tue, 18 Dec

Restricting VPN 3000 Groups [7:51798]

2002-08-20 Thread Fly Ers
We are currently using rsa ace server to authenticate vpn clients connecting to vpn3000 concentrator. we will need to create different groups depending on users function, thus several pcf files will need to be deployed. we will need to restrict users to a particular vpn concentrator group.