On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 3:05 PM, Bart Botta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 1:29 PM, Luís Oliveira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually, I wouldn't mind seeing the per-function enums come back.
Having compile-time warnings when we passed a bogus keyword was nice.
Sounds like a
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 5:27 PM, Luís Oliveira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sounds good to me. It'd be great if this process could somehow
highlight changes in the spec so that step 2 can be focused on what
changed instead of having to review everything.
Yeah, that was the idea, though I'm
