On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 2:05 AM, xristos wrote:
> This is a revised patch that could do with some testing.
> (Luis: this is basically darwin5 with your fixes and single
> foreign function declarations that assume patched cffi)
I don't have time right now to test this patch but it looks OK so I
pus
This is a revised patch that could do with some testing.
(Luis: this is basically darwin5 with your fixes and single
foreign function declarations that assume patched cffi)
I tested it on sbcl(threads/nothreads) on 10.5 and 10.4
and ccl/ccl64 on same platforms. The only issue is when
running on t
