Re: [Clamav-devel] 0.101.5 (and .4), make check and gcc 9

2019-11-26 Thread Micah Snyder (micasnyd)
I wonder if they made a backwards incompatible change with fail_unless, or removed fail_unless? It appears fail_unless is deprecated: http://check.sourceforge.net/doc/check_html/check_4.html I'll try and reproduce the issue to investigate a little later. -Micah On 11/26/19, 8:52 AM,

Re: [Clamav-devel] 0.101.5 (and .4), make check and gcc 9

2019-11-26 Thread Sergey
On Tuesday 26 November 2019, Micah Snyder (micasnyd) wrote: > Hi Sergey, > > Thanks for investigating. I believe that test_cl_dup() and a few others > in there are completely empty. I looked at them a few days ago and > thought to myself, "Is this even allowed?". Perhaps maybe it isn't >

Re: [Clamav-devel] 0.101.5 (and .4), make check and gcc 9

2019-11-26 Thread Micah Snyder (micasnyd)
Hi Sergey, Thanks for investigating. I believe that test_cl_dup() and a few others in there are completely empty. I looked at them a few days ago and thought to myself, "Is this even allowed?". Perhaps maybe it isn't (anymore). I imagine if all references to test_cl_dup and the other empty

Re: [Clamav-devel] 0.101.5 (and .4), make check and gcc 9

2019-11-26 Thread Sergey
On Monday 25 November 2019, Sergey wrote: > "make check" fails with multiple errors when I use gcc 9. Is ClamAV > adapted to build by gcc 9? > > For example: > > In file included from check_clamav.c:11: > check_clamav.c: In function 'test_cl_free_fn': > check_clamav.c:43:12: error: storage