I wonder if they made a backwards incompatible change with fail_unless, or
removed fail_unless? It appears fail_unless is deprecated:
http://check.sourceforge.net/doc/check_html/check_4.html
I'll try and reproduce the issue to investigate a little later.
-Micah
On 11/26/19, 8:52 AM, "clam
On Tuesday 26 November 2019, Micah Snyder (micasnyd) wrote:
> Hi Sergey,
>
> Thanks for investigating. I believe that test_cl_dup() and a few others
> in there are completely empty. I looked at them a few days ago and
> thought to myself, "Is this even allowed?". Perhaps maybe it isn't
> (any
Hi Sergey,
Thanks for investigating. I believe that test_cl_dup() and a few others in
there are completely empty. I looked at them a few days ago and thought to
myself, "Is this even allowed?". Perhaps maybe it isn't (anymore). I imagine
if all references to test_cl_dup and the other empty t
On Monday 25 November 2019, Sergey wrote:
> "make check" fails with multiple errors when I use gcc 9. Is ClamAV
> adapted to build by gcc 9?
>
> For example:
>
> In file included from check_clamav.c:11:
> check_clamav.c: In function 'test_cl_free_fn':
> check_clamav.c:43:12: error: storage class
Hello.
"make check" fails with multiple errors when I use gcc 9. Is ClamAV
adapted to build by gcc 9?
For example:
In file included from check_clamav.c:11:
check_clamav.c: In function 'test_cl_free_fn':
check_clamav.c:43:12: error: storage class specified for parameter
'test_cl_dup_fn'
43 |