[Clamav-devel] Re: proposed patch - fork() instead of system() for OnError/UpdateExecute

2005-03-01 Thread Per Jessen
Per Jessen wrote: http://jessen.ch/files/patch-clamav-0.83-freshclam-with-fork2 Any other comments - Tomasz maybe? /Per Jessen, Zürich ___ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-devel.html

Re: [Clamav-devel] something seemingly wrong in libClamAV\line.c

2005-03-01 Thread Nigel Horne
On Tuesday 01 Mar 2005 06:24, Jin Tao wrote: Line 60 in libClamAV\Line.c is line_t *ret = (line_t *)li_malloc(sizeof(struct line)); ,which I think should be line_t *ret = (line_t *)cli_malloc(sizeof(struct line)); Is that right? I don't know what li_malloc means. It means

Re: [Clamav-devel] Re: proposed patch - fork() instead of system() for OnError/UpdateExecute

2005-03-01 Thread Laurent Wacrenier
Le Ven 25 fév 15:03:51 2005, Per Jessen écrit: - The system shell may not be /bin/sh everywhere. system() uses /bin/sh -c on Linux - I wanted to keep the existing behaviour of system(). /bin/sh is a reasonable default, but you can't assert the system shell is here. It may live in a lot of

[Clamav-devel] Re: Re: proposed patch - fork() instead of system() for OnError/UpdateExecute

2005-03-01 Thread Per Jessen
Laurent Wacrenier wrote: /bin/sh is a reasonable default, but you can't assert the system shell is here. It may live in a lot of places like /bin/posix/sh, /usr/bin/sh /usr/xpg4/bin/sh... Fair enough. I'll use _PATH_BSHELL from paths.h instead -

[Clamav-devel] clmilter_watch license terms

2005-03-01 Thread Damian Menscher
I've completed a short perl script that can be used in an analogous way to clamdwatch to verify the proper operation of clamav-milter. It is designed to run out of cron, and restart the milter if needed. At the moment, the only holdup on releasing it is waiting for the lawyers to approve the