Re: [Clamav-devel] Re: [Clamav-announce] announcing ClamAV 0.84rc 1

2005-04-20 Thread James Paige
Damian Menscher wrote: On Wed, 20 Apr 2005, Nigel Horne wrote: On Wednesday 20 Apr 2005 15:02, Trog wrote: http://www.itg.uiuc.edu/itg_software/clmilter_watch/ I don't see the need for it. Clamav-milter is stable. "One of those people actually has seen it restart the milter when it had failed."

Re: [Clamav-devel] Re: [Clamav-announce] announcing ClamAV 0.84rc 1

2005-04-20 Thread Damian Menscher
On Wed, 20 Apr 2005, Nigel Horne wrote: On Wednesday 20 Apr 2005 15:02, Trog wrote: http://www.itg.uiuc.edu/itg_software/clmilter_watch/ I don't see the need for it. Clamav-milter is stable. "One of those people actually has seen it restart the milter when it had failed." No bug report was receiv

Re: [Clamav-devel] Re: [Clamav-announce] announcing ClamAV 0.84rc 1

2005-04-20 Thread Paul L Daniels
> I actually agree with this sentiment, and it also applies to the various > clamd monitoring scripts, which are also a bug hiding hack. I suspect for some people in the position of "we'll have hold-tight until a patch arrives", they obtain comfort in having such scripts on-hand. Of cou

Re: [Clamav-devel] Re: [Clamav-announce] announcing ClamAV 0.84rc 1

2005-04-20 Thread Trog
On Wed, 2005-04-20 at 15:06 +0100, Nigel Horne wrote: > I don't see the need for it. Clamav-milter is stable. > > "One of those people actually has seen it restart the milter when it had > failed." > > No bug report was received that the milter is failing. It would be a better > use > of the

Re: [Clamav-devel] Re: [Clamav-announce] announcing ClamAV 0.84rc 1

2005-04-20 Thread Nigel Horne
On Wednesday 20 Apr 2005 15:02, Trog wrote: > On Wed, 2005-04-20 at 15:00 +0100, Nigel Horne wrote: > > > > Nigel, could you please review the script? > > > > What script is this? > > > > This one: > > http://www.itg.uiuc.edu/itg_software/clmilter_watch/ I don't see the need for it. Clamav-mi

Re: [Clamav-devel] Re: [Clamav-announce] announcing ClamAV 0.84rc 1

2005-04-20 Thread Tomasz Kojm
On Wed, 20 Apr 2005 15:00:03 +0100 Nigel Horne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wednesday 20 Apr 2005 14:49, Tomasz Kojm wrote: > > On Mon, 11 Apr 2005 22:27:44 -0500 (CDT) > > Damian Menscher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > So, it's been out for about 6 weeks, and I know of at least 4 > > >

Re: [Clamav-devel] Re: [Clamav-announce] announcing ClamAV 0.84rc 1

2005-04-20 Thread Trog
On Wed, 2005-04-20 at 15:00 +0100, Nigel Horne wrote: > > Nigel, could you please review the script? > > What script is this? > This one: http://www.itg.uiuc.edu/itg_software/clmilter_watch/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part _

Re: [Clamav-devel] Re: [Clamav-announce] announcing ClamAV 0.84rc 1

2005-04-20 Thread Nigel Horne
On Wednesday 20 Apr 2005 14:49, Tomasz Kojm wrote: > On Mon, 11 Apr 2005 22:27:44 -0500 (CDT) > Damian Menscher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > So, it's been out for about 6 weeks, and I know of at least 4 people > > using it in production (and weblogs indicate there may be many more). > > One

Re: [Clamav-devel] Re: [Clamav-announce] announcing ClamAV 0.84rc 1

2005-04-20 Thread Tomasz Kojm
On Mon, 11 Apr 2005 22:27:44 -0500 (CDT) Damian Menscher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So, it's been out for about 6 weeks, and I know of at least 4 people > using it in production (and weblogs indicate there may be many more). > One of those people actually has seen it restart the milter when it