[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 21 Feb 2007, Nigel Horne wrote:
; Michael Schaap wrote:
; > My guess is that {rcpt_addr} is used instead of argv[0] because of whitelist
; > checking.
;
; No, it was changed because users wanted it to be changed.
Of course, with that code, users have the option o
Nigel Horne wrote:
Michael Schaap wrote:
Hi,
I noticed that virus notifications sent by clamav-milter only contain
the recipient's username, and not the full email address.
This is rather unfortunate, since this makes it hard to figure out
which email address has been compromised, if you have
On Wed, 21 Feb 2007, Nigel Horne wrote:
; Michael Schaap wrote:
; > My guess is that {rcpt_addr} is used instead of argv[0] because of whitelist
; > checking.
;
; No, it was changed because users wanted it to be changed.
Of course, with that code, users have the option of configuring sendmail
not
Michael Schaap wrote:
Hi,
I noticed that virus notifications sent by clamav-milter only contain
the recipient's username, and not the full email address.
This is rather unfortunate, since this makes it hard to figure out which
email address has been compromised, if you have multiple aliases /
I also filed a bug report for this: bug 337.
– Michael
___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-devel.html
Please submit your patches to our Bugzilla: http://bugs.clamav.net
Hi,
I noticed that virus notifications sent by clamav-milter only contain
the recipient's username, and not the full email address.
This is rather unfortunate, since this makes it hard to figure out which
email address has been compromised, if you have multiple aliases /
virtusernames.
I had
On Mon, Feb 19, 2007 at 01:21:33AM +, Stephen Gran said:
> Hello all,
>
> In clamav-milter.c, I see:
I've changed the subject a bit to try to catch Nigel's attention. Sorry
about following up to myself.
--
--
| Stephe
