On 2009-12-22 14:43, Renato Botelho wrote:
> 2009/12/22 Török Edwin :
>
>> Because the compiler is too old:
>>
>> checking for supported C++ compiler version... configure: error: C++
>> compiler too old (3.4.6)
>>
>
> By default, ports use the default base system compiler, of course i can
On 2009-12-22 14:38, Renato Botelho wrote:
> 2009/12/22 Török Edwin :
>
>> On 2009-12-22 13:36, Török Edwin wrote:
>>
I'll ask user to test it, but anyway, here you can see a buildlog on
my 7.2 tinderbox that went fine, and it was built for i386 too...
http://freebsd1.as
2009/12/22 Török Edwin :
> Because the compiler is too old:
>
> checking for supported C++ compiler version... configure: error: C++ compiler
> too old (3.4.6)
By default, ports use the default base system compiler, of course i can force it
to use other version of GCC, do you think it's the corre
2009/12/22 Török Edwin :
> Yes, I opened a bug about that now:
> https://wwws.clamav.net/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1781
>
> For now the workaround for the user is to set the CPU for the build to
> at least i486.
OK, i'll mark clamav-devel port as BROKEN on FreeBSD i386 for now.
--
Renato Botelho
On 2009-12-22 14:28, Renato Botelho wrote:
> 2009/12/22 Török Edwin :
>
>> On 2009-12-22 13:36, Török Edwin wrote:
>>
I'll ask user to test it, but anyway, here you can see a buildlog on
my 7.2 tinderbox that went fine, and it was built for i386 too...
http://freebsd1.as
2009/12/22 Török Edwin :
> On 2009-12-22 13:36, Török Edwin wrote:
>>>
>>> I'll ask user to test it, but anyway, here you can see a buildlog on
>>> my 7.2 tinderbox that went fine, and it was built for i386 too...
>>>
>>> http://freebsd1.asmallorange.com//logs/7.2-i386-garga/clamav-devel-20091221.l
On 2009-12-22 14:23, Renato Botelho wrote:
> 2009/12/22 Török Edwin :
>
>> On 2009-12-22 13:36, Török Edwin wrote:
>>
I'll ask user to test it, but anyway, here you can see a buildlog on
my 7.2 tinderbox that went fine, and it was built for i386 too...
http://freebsd1.as
2009/12/22 Török Edwin :
> On 2009-12-22 13:36, Török Edwin wrote:
>>>
>>> I'll ask user to test it, but anyway, here you can see a buildlog on
>>> my 7.2 tinderbox that went fine, and it was built for i386 too...
>>>
>>> http://freebsd1.asmallorange.com//logs/7.2-i386-garga/clamav-devel-20091221.l
2009/12/22 Török Edwin :
> On 2009-12-22 13:36, Török Edwin wrote:
>>>
>>> I'll ask user to test it, but anyway, here you can see a buildlog on
>>> my 7.2 tinderbox that went fine, and it was built for i386 too...
>>>
>>> http://freebsd1.asmallorange.com//logs/7.2-i386-garga/clamav-devel-20091221.l
On 2009-12-22 13:36, Török Edwin wrote:
>>
>> I'll ask user to test it, but anyway, here you can see a buildlog on
>> my 7.2 tinderbox that went fine, and it was built for i386 too...
>>
>> http://freebsd1.asmallorange.com//logs/7.2-i386-garga/clamav-devel-20091221.log
>>
>>
>>
>
> LLVM got
On 2009-12-22 13:34, Renato Botelho wrote:
> 2009/12/22 Török Edwin :
>
>> On 2009-12-22 12:40, Renato Botelho wrote:
>>
>>> 2009/12/22 Török Edwin :
>>>
>>>
On 2009-12-21 16:57, Renato Botelho wrote:
> 2009/12/21 Török Edwin :
>
>
>
2009/12/22 Török Edwin :
> On 2009-12-22 12:40, Renato Botelho wrote:
>> 2009/12/22 Török Edwin :
>>
>>> On 2009-12-21 16:57, Renato Botelho wrote:
>>>
2009/12/21 Török Edwin :
> Hi Renato,
>
> Thanks for the patch, what if you only wrap the include by #ifdef
> HAVE_U
On 2009-12-22 12:40, Renato Botelho wrote:
> 2009/12/22 Török Edwin :
>
>> On 2009-12-21 16:57, Renato Botelho wrote:
>>
>>> 2009/12/21 Török Edwin :
>>>
>>>
Hi Renato,
Thanks for the patch, what if you only wrap the include by #ifdef
HAVE_UNISTD_H?
Some
13 matches
Mail list logo
