This is awesome. You guys rock hardcore.
On Mar 2, 2010 12:24 PM, "Matt Watchinski"
wrote:
The release date for ClamAV 0.96 RC 1 has been moved up to March 10th, 2010.
With that in mind, I wanted to take a moment to highlight some of the new
features we've been working on and a new product for C
The release date for ClamAV 0.96 RC 1 has been moved up to March 10th, 2010.
With that in mind, I wanted to take a moment to highlight some of the new
features we've been working on and a new product for ClamAV Windows users.
Additionally, I'd like to encourage users to try out the RC when its rele
I can understand that on some legacy production systems, it would be easier
to work around than upgrade. I have run into FC3 production machines, and
just compiling clamav or such wouldn't just work.
Limor, can you give us a reason why it's an issue?
2010/3/2 Török Edwin
> On 03/02/2010 02:00 P
On 03/02/2010 02:00 PM, Limor Tal wrote:
> 1. Can I keep using code that is older than 0.95 with the future CVD files
Why? What prevents you from upgrading?
What version are you running now?
> (those that will be distributed starting from May 2010) if I do not use
> sigtool and cdiff?
If you som
1. Can I keep using code that is older than 0.95 with the future CVD files
(those that will be distributed starting from May 2010) if I do not use
sigtool and cdiff?
2. Are those the only places in the code where the long signatures in the
daily file cause a problem?
3. Is the signature length the
