Hi,
I have a question about the CVD that will contain a special signature
which disables all clamd installations older than 0.95. What exactly
will this do?
Will old versions always report No virus?
Or will they always report Virus?
Or will they always report an error?
Regards,
David.
Sun Studio Compiler finds two buglets in 0.96.
**
CC bcrun.o
bcrun.c, line 240: warning: initializer does not fit or is out of
range: -1
Line 240 is :
unsigned int fd = -1;
An unsigned integer can't be negative. Should delete the word unsigned.
On 04/07/2010 09:21 PM, David F. Skoll wrote:
Hi,
I have a question about the CVD that will contain a special signature
which disables all clamd installations older than 0.95. What exactly
will this do?
Will old versions always report No virus?
Or will they always report Virus?
Or
On 04/07/2010 10:17 PM, Jose-Marcio Martins da Cruz wrote:
Sun Studio Compiler finds two buglets in 0.96.
**
CC bcrun.o
bcrun.c, line 240: warning: initializer does not fit or is out of
range: -1
Line 240 is :
unsigned int fd = -1;
An
Would you prefer freshclam/ClamAV crash/corrupt memory when loading the
new databases with 980 byte lines?
If it was impossible to support new functionality with a database compatible
with ClamAV =0.94, then the database should have forked -- two sets of
databases generated by the automated
On 04/08/2010 12:05 AM, David F. Skoll wrote:
Török Edwin wrote:
Would you prefer freshclam/ClamAV crash/corrupt memory when loading the
new databases with 980 byte lines?
No. I can think of ways around this to make things degrade
gracefully:
o The server
You mean to do this on all
David,
While I agree, to some extent, with your concerns, I cannot help but wonder why
you waited until now to raise this issue. The fact that ClamAV =0.94 would
stop working on April 15 was first announced six months ago, on October 6,
2009. Surely this question would have been better asked
On Wed Apr 07 2010 22:47:27 GMT+0200 (CET)
David F. Skoll d...@roaringpenguin.com wrote:
OK. That's bad. Really bad. It's an enormous problem for us.
We have some customers (I don't know exactly how many) who are
running ClamAV = 0.94.2. When this hits the ether, their mail
servers will
Török Edwin wrote:
How about 0.95? That version has been out for a while, and its not
affected by this bug.
Well, you don't seem to have any reservations about a kill-switch for
0.95, so I don't see why you're suddenly so concerned about 0.95.
After all, everyone should be on the leading-edge
Mark Pizzolato - ClamAV-devel wrote:
Will refuse to load means that daily.cvd will be considered a
malformed database by ClamAV = 0.94.2.
That would be the case if it was actually downloaded.
Will the freshclam = 0.94.2 actually download the updated signatures?
I think it won't and it
On 07/04/2010 23.26, David F. Skoll wrote:
Török Edwin wrote:
How about 0.95? That version has been out for a while, and its not
affected by this bug.
Well, you don't seem to have any reservations about a kill-switch for
0.95, so I don't see why you're suddenly so concerned about 0.95.
On 04/07/2010 08:33 PM, Gianluigi Tiesi wrote:
ask ms about windows xp :)
There is no kill switch in Windows XP. Microsoft is ending support for
it, but existing installations of Windows XP will continue to work as
they always have for the indefinite future.
The parallel in the
12 matches
Mail list logo
