On 05/18/2010 09:09 PM, Mohammed Al-Saleh wrote:
> Hi Edwin,
>
> On Apr 27, 2010, at 7:19 AM, Török Edwin wrote:
>
>> On 04/26/2010 10:20 PM, Mohammed Al-Saleh wrote:
>>> Hi Edwin,
>>>
>>> Thanks for your reply.
>>> I need to know the cases where ClamAV has performance bottlenecks or issues.
>>
>
Hi Edwin,
On Apr 27, 2010, at 7:19 AM, Török Edwin wrote:
> On 04/26/2010 10:20 PM, Mohammed Al-Saleh wrote:
>> Hi Edwin,
>>
>> Thanks for your reply.
>> I need to know the cases where ClamAV has performance bottlenecks or issues.
>
> The best way to do that is by measuring it.
> Read the last
On 17 May 2010, at 7:32 pm, Török Edwin wrote:
A real fix would be to detect the Apple-style universal build
(configure
does this already), and build both ppc and x86 then.
If you open a bugreport I'll try to do that for 0.96.2.
OK, filed as bug 2030. https://wwws.clamav.net/bugzilla/show_b
On 05/18/2010 03:18 PM, Brandon Perry wrote:
> I agree that this would be neat as long as the current way is still
> available. I don't want to have to install git or svn on the servers just to
> be able to update my clam sigs.
Distributing the virus DB via git/svn wouldn't scale, I don't think
Da
I agree that this would be neat as long as the current way is still
available. I don't want to have to install git or svn on the servers just to
be able to update my clam sigs.
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 7:13 AM, David F. Skoll wrote:
> > From: Mohammed Al-Saleh
>
> > Is the virus database updated
On 05/18/2010 03:13 PM, David F. Skoll wrote:
>> From: Mohammed Al-Saleh
>
>> Is the virus database updated through a repository (for example svn or cvs)?
>> I would like to see how virus database changes over time.
>
> Interesting. I guess there's nothing stopping you from putting the
> databa
> From: Mohammed Al-Saleh
> Is the virus database updated through a repository (for example svn or cvs)?
> I would like to see how virus database changes over time.
Interesting. I guess there's nothing stopping you from putting the
database in a git repo or similar. You could do a commit each
