On 03/04/2010 08:51 PM, Renato Botelho wrote:
> 2010/3/4 Török Edwin :
>> On 03/04/2010 08:44 PM, Renato Botelho wrote:
>>> 2010/3/4 Török Edwin :
On 03/04/2010 08:37 PM, Renato Botelho wrote:
> 2010/3/4 Török Edwin :
>> On 03/04/2010 08:29 PM, Renato Botelho wrote:
>>> 2010/3/4 Tö
On 03/04/2010 07:34 PM, Török Edwin wrote:
> On 03/04/2010 07:25 PM, Renato Botelho wrote:
testegw# ldd llvmunittest_ADT
llvmunittest_ADT:
libthr.so.2 => /usr/lib/libthr.so.2 (0x8006e7000)
libstdc++.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/gcc42/libstdc++.so.6 (0x8007fe000)
On 03/04/2010 07:25 PM, Renato Botelho wrote:
>>> testegw# ldd llvmunittest_ADT
>>> llvmunittest_ADT:
>>> libthr.so.2 => /usr/lib/libthr.so.2 (0x8006e7000)
>>> libstdc++.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/gcc42/libstdc++.so.6 (0x8007fe000)
>>> libm.so.4 => /lib/libm.so.4 (0x800a0a000)
>
2010/3/4 Török Edwin :
> On 03/04/2010 07:17 PM, Renato Botelho wrote:
>> 2010/3/4 Török Edwin :
>>> On 03/04/2010 07:01 PM, Renato Botelho wrote:
2010/3/4 Török Edwin :
> On 03/04/2010 06:02 PM, Renato Botelho wrote:
>> Without -O2, results changed
>>
>> #10 0x
On 03/04/2010 07:17 PM, Renato Botelho wrote:
> 2010/3/4 Török Edwin :
>> On 03/04/2010 07:01 PM, Renato Botelho wrote:
>>> 2010/3/4 Török Edwin :
On 03/04/2010 06:02 PM, Renato Botelho wrote:
> Without -O2, results changed
>
> #10 0x in ?? ()
> #11 0x00
2010/3/4 Török Edwin :
> On 03/04/2010 07:01 PM, Renato Botelho wrote:
>> 2010/3/4 Török Edwin :
>>> On 03/04/2010 06:02 PM, Renato Botelho wrote:
Without -O2, results changed
#10 0x in ?? ()
#11 0x in ?? ()
#12 0x in ?? ()
>>
On 03/04/2010 07:01 PM, Renato Botelho wrote:
> 2010/3/4 Török Edwin :
>> On 03/04/2010 06:02 PM, Renato Botelho wrote:
>>> Without -O2, results changed
>>>
>>> #10 0x in ?? ()
>>> #11 0x in ?? ()
>>> #12 0x in ?? ()
>>> #13 0x in ?? (
2010/3/4 Török Edwin :
> On 03/04/2010 06:02 PM, Renato Botelho wrote:
>>
>> Without -O2, results changed
>>
>> #10 0x in ?? ()
>> #11 0x in ?? ()
>> #12 0x in ?? ()
>> #13 0x in ?? ()
>> #14 0x0001 in ?? ()
>> #15 0x00
On 03/04/2010 06:02 PM, Renato Botelho wrote:
>
> Without -O2, results changed
>
> #10 0x in ?? ()
> #11 0x in ?? ()
> #12 0x in ?? ()
> #13 0x in ?? ()
> #14 0x0001 in ?? ()
> #15 0x in ?? ()
> #16 0x
2010/3/4 Török Edwin :
> On 03/04/2010 04:07 PM, Renato Botelho wrote:
>> 2010/3/4 Török Edwin :
>>> On 03/04/2010 03:12 PM, Renato Botelho wrote:
I got a real 6.4 amd64 machine, and i reproduced the problem,
here is the data i collected after build with -g:
>>> Did you set CXXFLAGS to -g
On 03/04/2010 04:07 PM, Renato Botelho wrote:
> 2010/3/4 Török Edwin :
>> On 03/04/2010 03:12 PM, Renato Botelho wrote:
>>> I got a real 6.4 amd64 machine, and i reproduced the problem,
>>> here is the data i collected after build with -g:
>> Did you set CXXFLAGS to -g? Setting CFLAGS has no effect
2010/3/4 Török Edwin :
> On 03/04/2010 03:12 PM, Renato Botelho wrote:
>> I got a real 6.4 amd64 machine, and i reproduced the problem,
>> here is the data i collected after build with -g:
>
> Did you set CXXFLAGS to -g? Setting CFLAGS has no effect on libclamav/c++
>
>>
>> testegw# gdb ./llvmunitt
2010/3/4 Török Edwin :
> On 03/04/2010 03:12 PM, Renato Botelho wrote:
>> I got a real 6.4 amd64 machine, and i reproduced the problem,
>> here is the data i collected after build with -g:
>
> Did you set CXXFLAGS to -g? Setting CFLAGS has no effect on libclamav/c++
>
>>
>> testegw# gdb ./llvmunitt
On 03/04/2010 03:12 PM, Renato Botelho wrote:
> I got a real 6.4 amd64 machine, and i reproduced the problem,
> here is the data i collected after build with -g:
Did you set CXXFLAGS to -g? Setting CFLAGS has no effect on libclamav/c++
>
> testegw# gdb ./llvmunittest_ADT
> GNU gdb 6.1.1 [FreeBSD
2010/3/1 Török Edwin :
> On 03/01/2010 10:46 PM, Renato Botelho wrote:
>> 2010/3/1 Török Edwin :
>>> On 03/01/2010 09:22 PM, Renato Botelho wrote:
Hello one more time,
I was trying to update clamav-devel port to a more recent snapshot
and I got some segfaults during make test, l
2010/3/1 Török Edwin :
> On 03/01/2010 10:46 PM, Renato Botelho wrote:
>> 2010/3/1 Török Edwin :
>>> On 03/01/2010 09:22 PM, Renato Botelho wrote:
Hello one more time,
I was trying to update clamav-devel port to a more recent snapshot
and I got some segfaults during make test, l
On 03/01/2010 10:46 PM, Renato Botelho wrote:
> 2010/3/1 Török Edwin :
>> On 03/01/2010 09:22 PM, Renato Botelho wrote:
>>> Hello one more time,
>>>
>>> I was trying to update clamav-devel port to a more recent snapshot
>>> and I got some segfaults during make test, like you can see here:
>> Which
2010/3/1 Török Edwin :
> On 03/01/2010 09:22 PM, Renato Botelho wrote:
>> Hello one more time,
>>
>> I was trying to update clamav-devel port to a more recent snapshot
>> and I got some segfaults during make test, like you can see here:
>
> Which FreeBSD version, and which architecture?
6.4-RELEAS
On 03/01/2010 09:22 PM, Renato Botelho wrote:
> Hello one more time,
>
> I was trying to update clamav-devel port to a more recent snapshot
> and I got some segfaults during make test, like you can see here:
Which FreeBSD version, and which architecture?
>
> g++42: -rpath=/usr/local/lib/gcc42:
Hello one more time,
I was trying to update clamav-devel port to a more recent snapshot
and I got some segfaults during make test, like you can see here:
g++42: -rpath=/usr/local/lib/gcc42: linker input file unused because
linking not done
CXXllvmunittest_JIT-JITMemoryManagerTest.o
g++42 -D
20 matches
Mail list logo
