On some rpm linux, eg RH5 for example, there is yum. You can provide them a
private yum server and this will done.
On FreeBSD, there is packages, same add a correct line into /etc/make.conf and
portupgrade -pP will fix this for you.
How about you do us all a favor and cut out the patronizing?
Hi there,
Le 8 avr. 2010 à 03:11, David F. Skoll a écrit :
> Jonathan Kamens wrote:
>
>> My company had hundreds of appliances in the field running versions of
>> ClamAV affected by this change. When we saw the announcement, we
>> immediately started working on figuring out how we were going to
On 04/08/2010 05:25 PM, G.W. Haywood wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> On Thu, 8 Apr 2010 T?r?k Edwin wrote:
>
>> The initial announcement about this was 6 month ago.
>
> It seems I missed that one. Can you point me to a link?
Initial announcement:
http://lists.clamav.net/lurker/message/20091006.143601.d
G.W. Haywood wrote:
>> The initial announcement about this was 6 month ago.
>
> It seems I missed that one. Can you point me to a link?
http://www.clamav.net/lang/de/2009/10/05/eol-clamav-094/
http://lists.clamav.net/lurker/message/20091006.143601.d27bbd20.en.html
http://lurker.clamav.net/mes
Hi there,
On Thu, 8 Apr 2010 T?r?k Edwin wrote:
> The initial announcement about this was 6 month ago.
It seems I missed that one. Can you point me to a link?
--
73,
Ged.
___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-devel.html
Please submit your patches
On 4/7/2010 4:05 PM, David F. Skoll wrote:
o The server could look at the Freshclam user-agent version number and
not serve up the new database if it's too old.
Wouldn't this provide a solution? I checked, and freshclam does provide
the version number in the User-Agent string. I used the t
David F. Skoll wrote:
Jonathan Kamens wrote:
My company had hundreds of appliances in the field running versions of
ClamAV affected by this change. When we saw the announcement, we
immediately started working on figuring out how we were going to get
them updated by April 15, and we succeeded in
Kamens, Jonathan wrote:
>
The initial announcement about this was 6 month ago.
> If a 6 month window to upgrade is not enough, what would be?
>
> I'd say that obsoleting and remotely disabling mission-critical
> software that is less than two years old is unreasonable whether the
> software
Jonathan Kamens wrote:
> My company had hundreds of appliances in the field running versions of
> ClamAV affected by this change. When we saw the announcement, we
> immediately started working on figuring out how we were going to get
> them updated by April 15, and we succeeded in doing so.
We ha
On 04/07/2010 08:33 PM, Gianluigi Tiesi wrote:
ask ms about windows xp :)
There is no kill switch in Windows XP. Microsoft is ending support for
it, but existing installations of Windows XP will continue to work as
they always have for the indefinite future.
The parallel in the anti-viru
On 07/04/2010 23.26, David F. Skoll wrote:
> Török Edwin wrote:
>
>> How about 0.95? That version has been out for a while, and its not
>> affected by this bug.
>
> Well, you don't seem to have any reservations about a kill-switch for
> <0.95, so I don't see why you're suddenly so concerned about
Mark Pizzolato - ClamAV-devel wrote:
>> "Will refuse to load" means that daily.cvd will be considered a
>> malformed database by ClamAV <= 0.94.2.
>
> That would be the case if it was actually downloaded.
> Will the freshclam <= 0.94.2 actually download the updated signatures?
>
> I think it w
On 04/07/2010 1:10 PM, Török Edwin wrote:
> On 04/07/2010 10:31 PM, Marc Balmer wrote:
> > Am 07.04.10 21:29, schrieb Török Edwin:
> >> On 04/07/2010 09:21 PM, David F. Skoll wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> I have a question about the CVD that will "contain a special signature
> >>> which disables all
Török Edwin wrote:
> How about 0.95? That version has been out for a while, and its not
> affected by this bug.
Well, you don't seem to have any reservations about a kill-switch for
<0.95, so I don't see why you're suddenly so concerned about 0.95.
After all, everyone should be on the leading-edg
On Wed Apr 07 2010 22:47:27 GMT+0200 (CET)
David F. Skoll wrote:
> OK. That's bad. Really bad. It's an enormous problem for us.
>
> We have some customers (I don't know exactly how many) who are
> running ClamAV <= 0.94.2. When this hits the ether, their mail
> servers will tempfail all mail
David,
While I agree, to some extent, with your concerns, I cannot help but wonder why
you waited until now to raise this issue. The fact that ClamAV <=0.94 would
stop working on April 15 was first announced six months ago, on October 6,
2009. Surely this question would have been better asked
On 04/08/2010 12:05 AM, David F. Skoll wrote:
> Török Edwin wrote:
>
>> Would you prefer freshclam/ClamAV crash/corrupt memory when loading the
>> new databases with >980 byte lines?
>
> No. I can think of ways around this to make things degrade
> gracefully:
>
> o The server
You mean to do th
>>>Would you prefer freshclam/ClamAV crash/corrupt memory when loading the
new databases with >980 byte lines?
If it was impossible to support new functionality with a database compatible
with ClamAV <=0.94, then the database should have forked -- two sets of
databases generated by the automated
Török Edwin wrote:
> Would you prefer freshclam/ClamAV crash/corrupt memory when loading the
> new databases with >980 byte lines?
No. I can think of ways around this to make things degrade
gracefully:
o The server could look at the Freshclam user-agent version number and
not serve up the new d
On 04/07/2010 11:47 PM, David F. Skoll wrote:
> (I apologize for breaking threading; I read clamav-devel in digest
> mode)
>
> Török Edwin wrote:
>
>> "Will refuse to load" means that daily.cvd will be considered a
>> malformed database by ClamAV <= 0.94.2.
>
>> If you have a malformed database
(I apologize for breaking threading; I read clamav-devel in digest
mode)
Török Edwin wrote:
> "Will refuse to load" means that daily.cvd will be considered a
> malformed database by ClamAV <= 0.94.2.
> If you have a malformed database you get an error message, and
> clamd/clamscan will exit with
On 04/07/2010 10:31 PM, Marc Balmer wrote:
> Am 07.04.10 21:29, schrieb Török Edwin:
>> On 04/07/2010 09:21 PM, David F. Skoll wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I have a question about the CVD that will "contain a special signature
>>> which disables all clamd installations older than 0.95." What exactly
>>>
Am 07.04.10 21:29, schrieb Török Edwin:
> On 04/07/2010 09:21 PM, David F. Skoll wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have a question about the CVD that will "contain a special signature
>> which disables all clamd installations older than 0.95." What exactly
>> will this do?
>>
>> Will old versions always repor
On 04/07/2010 09:21 PM, David F. Skoll wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a question about the CVD that will "contain a special signature
> which disables all clamd installations older than 0.95." What exactly
> will this do?
>
> Will old versions always report "No virus"?
>
> Or will they always report "
Hi,
I have a question about the CVD that will "contain a special signature
which disables all clamd installations older than 0.95." What exactly
will this do?
Will old versions always report "No virus"?
Or will they always report "Virus?"
Or will they always report an error?
Regards,
David.
25 matches
Mail list logo
