Re: RE: [Clamav-devel] why don't write portable code
Brian A. Reiter If you could compile clamav at Win32, it maybe have little fix to src. So now, it has a module Clamav-win32. My mean, it has not must. You could maintenance ONE src. Not to have the module of Clamav-win32. If want to use in Win32. Only compile it. Now we have use in win32, we must patch the src, and compile. Though, we could compile it in Cygwin, but the execustive must have DLL with Cygwin. === 2006-04-01 08:07:53 您在来信中写道：=== X-Gmail-Received: 7fb57286f11b0f23703c9d0c4a2d27a4c38d3b00 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: by 10.36.39.5 with SMTP id m5cs36786nzm; Fri, 31 Mar 2006 16:07:53 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.93.12 with SMTP id q12mr640685wrb; Fri, 31 Mar 2006 16:07:53 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from aj.catt.com (aj.catt.com [64.18.103.6]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 29si482937wrl.2006.03.31.16.07.49; Fri, 31 Mar 2006 16:07:53 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (gmail.com: domain of [EMAIL PROTECTED] designates 64.18.103.6 as permitted sender) Received: from aj.catt.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by aj.catt.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B82E156002; Fri, 31 Mar 2006 19:07:47 -0500 (EST) Received: from rs19.luxsci.com (rs19.luxsci.com [65.61.136.23]) by aj.catt.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90D6F10DA44 for clamav-devel@lists.clamav.net; Fri, 31 Mar 2006 19:07:44 -0500 (EST) Received: from prometheus (pool-72-75-60-71.washdc.east.verizon.net [72.75.60.71]) (authenticated bits=0) by rs19.luxsci.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k3107eZi018708 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NOT) for clamav-devel@lists.clamav.net; Fri, 31 Mar 2006 18:07:41 -0600 From: Brian A. Reiter [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'ClamAV Development' clamav-devel@lists.clamav.net Subject: RE: [Clamav-devel] why don't write portable code Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 19:07:32 -0500 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 Thread-Index: AcZVFl8cPxgzSxkuRISADJDEue5QoQACR8zQ In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.1830 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 X-BeenThere: clamav-devel@lists.clamav.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: ClamAV Development clamav-devel@lists.clamav.net List-Id: ClamAV Development clamav-devel.lists.clamav.net List-Unsubscribe: http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-devel, mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] List-Post: mailto:clamav-devel@lists.clamav.net List-Help: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] List-Subscribe: http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-devel, mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary2051393441== Mime-version: 1.0 Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --===2051393441== Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol=application/x-pkcs7-signature; micalg=SHA1; boundary==_NextPart_000_00C0_01C654F6.5CD55290 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --=_NextPart_000_00C0_01C654F6.5CD55290 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit i know it maybe use some time to write it, but i think it valuealbe. ONE ENGINE IS A CORE OF SOFTWARE. and why don't you design it indepent platform? if possible, the directory maybe plot clearly, the same The engine is POSIX compliant. And, in fact, Microsoft has made a POSIX-compliant executive sub-system derived from OpenBSD and System V available for Windows NT 5+. It is called Interix aka Services for UNIX and Subsystem for UNIX-based Applications (SUA). Clamd and clamscan run fine under Interix. Download SFU 3.5 here: http://www.microsoft.com/technet/interopmigration/unix/sfu/default.mspx Subsystem for Unix-based Applications (SUA/Interix 5.2): http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver2003/r2/unixinterop/default.mspx POSIX should be portable enough. --=_NextPart_000_00C0_01C654F6.5CD55290-- --===2051393441== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline ___ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-devel.html --===2051393441==-- = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = 致 礼！ BSCH [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-04-01 ___ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-devel.html
Re: RE: [Clamav-devel] why don't write portable code
Brian A. Reiter! if engine design pure. the others could use the clamav engine to write anti-virus software. the software not to write by us. ALL could use the engine convenience. === 2006-04-01 08:07:53 您在来信中写道：=== X-Gmail-Received: 7fb57286f11b0f23703c9d0c4a2d27a4c38d3b00 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: by 10.36.39.5 with SMTP id m5cs36786nzm; Fri, 31 Mar 2006 16:07:53 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.93.12 with SMTP id q12mr640685wrb; Fri, 31 Mar 2006 16:07:53 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from aj.catt.com (aj.catt.com [64.18.103.6]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 29si482937wrl.2006.03.31.16.07.49; Fri, 31 Mar 2006 16:07:53 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (gmail.com: domain of [EMAIL PROTECTED] designates 64.18.103.6 as permitted sender) Received: from aj.catt.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by aj.catt.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B82E156002; Fri, 31 Mar 2006 19:07:47 -0500 (EST) Received: from rs19.luxsci.com (rs19.luxsci.com [65.61.136.23]) by aj.catt.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90D6F10DA44 for clamav-devel@lists.clamav.net; Fri, 31 Mar 2006 19:07:44 -0500 (EST) Received: from prometheus (pool-72-75-60-71.washdc.east.verizon.net [72.75.60.71]) (authenticated bits=0) by rs19.luxsci.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k3107eZi018708 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NOT) for clamav-devel@lists.clamav.net; Fri, 31 Mar 2006 18:07:41 -0600 From: Brian A. Reiter [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'ClamAV Development' clamav-devel@lists.clamav.net Subject: RE: [Clamav-devel] why don't write portable code Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 19:07:32 -0500 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 Thread-Index: AcZVFl8cPxgzSxkuRISADJDEue5QoQACR8zQ In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.1830 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 X-BeenThere: clamav-devel@lists.clamav.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: ClamAV Development clamav-devel@lists.clamav.net List-Id: ClamAV Development clamav-devel.lists.clamav.net List-Unsubscribe: http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-devel, mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] List-Post: mailto:clamav-devel@lists.clamav.net List-Help: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] List-Subscribe: http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-devel, mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary2051393441== Mime-version: 1.0 Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --===2051393441== Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol=application/x-pkcs7-signature; micalg=SHA1; boundary==_NextPart_000_00C0_01C654F6.5CD55290 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --=_NextPart_000_00C0_01C654F6.5CD55290 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit i know it maybe use some time to write it, but i think it valuealbe. ONE ENGINE IS A CORE OF SOFTWARE. and why don't you design it indepent platform? if possible, the directory maybe plot clearly, the same The engine is POSIX compliant. And, in fact, Microsoft has made a POSIX-compliant executive sub-system derived from OpenBSD and System V available for Windows NT 5+. It is called Interix aka Services for UNIX and Subsystem for UNIX-based Applications (SUA). Clamd and clamscan run fine under Interix. Download SFU 3.5 here: http://www.microsoft.com/technet/interopmigration/unix/sfu/default.mspx Subsystem for Unix-based Applications (SUA/Interix 5.2): http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver2003/r2/unixinterop/default.mspx POSIX should be portable enough. --=_NextPart_000_00C0_01C654F6.5CD55290-- --===2051393441== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline ___ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-devel.html --===2051393441==-- = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = 致 礼！ BSCH [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-04-01 ___ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-devel.html
Re: RE: [Clamav-devel] why don't write portable code
BSCH in message 'Re: [Clamav-devel] why don't write portable code' wrote:
Brian A. Reiter!
if engine design pure. the others could use the clamav engine to write
anti-virus software. the software not to write by us. ALL could use the
engine convenience.
I don't think you understand the differences between UNIX and Windows
platforms. Programming in these environments is totaly different, and
creating one universal engine wouldn't be reasonable.
And what problems do you see for others writing anti-virus software
on ClamAV basis?
btw: 1) I'm not a native english speaker, but it's quite hard o understand
what you're trying to say (this and previous posts)
2) stop top-posting, this is really annoying.
main(int a[puts(Michał 'GiM' Spadliński)]){}
--
144722 lcamtuf I've found bug in sendmail
144724 lcamtuf what a suprise
___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-devel.html
Re: Re: RE: [Clamav-devel] why don't write portable code
GiM,您好！
I think you not to understand my mean.
your said Programming in these environments is totaly different, and
creating one universal engine wouldn't be reasonable. YOU COULD NOT PROOF
IT.
The engine is pure! It only match signature one a file! match signature could
use standar c or c++.
=== 2006-04-01 23:10:09 您在来信中写道：===
BSCH in message 'Re: [Clamav-devel] why don't write portable code' wrote:
Brian A. Reiter!
if engine design pure. the others could use the clamav engine to write
anti-virus software. the software not to write by us. ALL could use the
engine convenience.
I don't think you understand the differences between UNIX and Windows
platforms. Programming in these environments is totaly different, and
creating one universal engine wouldn't be reasonable.
And what problems do you see for others writing anti-virus software
on ClamAV basis?
btw: 1) I'm not a native english speaker, but it's quite hard o understand
what you're trying to say (this and previous posts)
2) stop top-posting, this is really annoying.
main(int a[puts(Michał 'GiM' Spadliński)]){}
--
144722 lcamtuf I've found bug in sendmail
144724 lcamtuf what a suprise
___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-devel.html
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
致
礼！
BSCH
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
2006-04-02
___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-devel.html
RE: Re: RE: [Clamav-devel] why don't write portable code
GiM,您好！ your said Programming in these environments is totaly different, and creating one universal engine wouldn't be reasonable. YOU COULD NOT PROOF IT. The engine is pure! It only match signature one a file! match signature could use standar c or c++. I strongly suggest that we all stop feeding the troll. BSCH [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-04-02 -Nigel ___ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-devel.html
Re: [Clamav-devel] why don't write portable code
On Sat, 1 Apr 2006 05:19:35 +0800 梁飞 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: clamav-devel，您好！ why don't you write portable code? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/POSIX if some function must use dependent platform API, we could implement it using macro at runtime. e.g, visit a directory are difference in Linux and Win32. We could implement a VisitDirectory fuction in LibClamav, and use it. The implement of VisitDirectory fuction depend on macro at runtime. i think engine is pure, and portable. if that, we could easier to portable it in diffent OS. ClamAV was not designed for win32 and to use it effectively on this platform one would need to redesign the whole engine, implement new features and provide specialised signature updates. -- oo. Tomasz Kojm [EMAIL PROTECTED] (\/)\. http://www.ClamAV.net/gpg/tkojm.gpg \..._ 0DCA5A08407D5288279DB43454822DC8985A444B //\ /\ Fri Mar 31 23:52:56 CEST 2006 signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-devel.html
Re: Re: [Clamav-devel] why don't write portable code
Tomasz Kojm,您好！ but in fact, engine is pure. Most of commercial AV has Linux and Win32 version. so... the engine could be design the independ OS, why don't you code that? i know it maybe use some time to write it, but i think it valuealbe. ONE ENGINE IS A CORE OF SOFTWARE. and why don't you design it indepent platform? if possible, the directory maybe plot clearly, the same functions maybe in ONE DIRECTORY. it's a little suggestion. === 2006-04-01 05:54:50 您在来信中写道：=== On Sat, 1 Apr 2006 05:19:35 +0800 梁飞 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: clamav-devel，您好！ why don't you write portable code? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/POSIX if some function must use dependent platform API, we could implement it using macro at runtime. e.g, visit a directory are difference in Linux and Win32. We could implement a VisitDirectory fuction in LibClamav, and use it. The implement of VisitDirectory fuction depend on macro at runtime. i think engine is pure, and portable. if that, we could easier to portable it in diffent OS. ClamAV was not designed for win32 and to use it effectively on this platform one would need to redesign the whole engine, implement new features and provide specialised signature updates. -- oo. Tomasz Kojm [EMAIL PROTECTED] (\/)\. http://www.ClamAV.net/gpg/tkojm.gpg \..._ 0DCA5A08407D5288279DB43454822DC8985A444B //\ /\ Fri Mar 31 23:52:56 CEST 2006 ___ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-devel.html = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = 致 礼！ 梁飞 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-04-01 ___ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-devel.html
Re: [Clamav-devel] why don't write portable code
On Sat, 1 Apr 2006 06:21:53 +0800 梁飞 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Tomasz Kojm,您好！ but in fact, engine is pure. Most of commercial AV has Linux and Win32 version. so... the engine could be design the independ OS, why don't you code that? http://www.clamav.net/abstract.html#pagestart Clam AntiVirus is a GPL anti-virus toolkit for UNIX.[...] i know it maybe use some time to write it, but i think it valuealbe. ONE ENGINE IS A CORE OF SOFTWARE. and why don't you design it indepent platform? if possible, the directory maybe plot clearly, the same The engine is POSIX compliant. -- oo. Tomasz Kojm [EMAIL PROTECTED] (\/)\. http://www.ClamAV.net/gpg/tkojm.gpg \..._ 0DCA5A08407D5288279DB43454822DC8985A444B //\ /\ Sat Apr 1 00:54:35 CEST 2006 signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-devel.html
RE: [Clamav-devel] why don't write portable code
i know it maybe use some time to write it, but i think it valuealbe. ONE ENGINE IS A CORE OF SOFTWARE. and why don't you design it indepent platform? if possible, the directory maybe plot clearly, the same The engine is POSIX compliant. And, in fact, Microsoft has made a POSIX-compliant executive sub-system derived from OpenBSD and System V available for Windows NT 5+. It is called Interix aka Services for UNIX and Subsystem for UNIX-based Applications (SUA). Clamd and clamscan run fine under Interix. Download SFU 3.5 here: http://www.microsoft.com/technet/interopmigration/unix/sfu/default.mspx Subsystem for Unix-based Applications (SUA/Interix 5.2): http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver2003/r2/unixinterop/default.mspx POSIX should be portable enough. ___ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-devel.html
