Re: [Clamav-devel] New 0.95 API concerns

2009-03-12 Thread Renato Botelho
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 12:34 PM, Tomasz Kojm tk...@clamav.net wrote: On Mon, 02 Mar 2009 12:39:47 +0300 Eugene Crosser cros...@average.org wrote: To mitigate this problem (if you *really* want to get rid of cl_limits structure exposed to the user), you might introduce separate pairs of

Re: [Clamav-devel] New 0.95 API concerns

2009-03-12 Thread Eugene Crosser
Tomasz, thank you for your attention to my concerns. Now I can go ahead and adjust zmscanner's clamav plugin to use the new API ... with confidence! :-) Eugene signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___

Re: [Clamav-devel] New 0.95 API concerns

2009-03-12 Thread Tomasz Kojm
On Thu, 12 Mar 2009 20:01:59 +0300 Eugene Crosser cros...@average.org wrote: Tomasz, thank you for your attention to my concerns. Now I can go ahead and adjust zmscanner's clamav plugin to use the new API ... with confidence! :-) You're welcome! -- oo. Tomasz Kojm

Re: [Clamav-devel] New 0.95 API concerns

2009-03-12 Thread Tomasz Kojm
On Thu, 12 Mar 2009 12:47:28 -0300 Renato Botelho rbga...@gmail.com wrote: Since API was chenged one more time, a new RC will be released to 0.95? I'm just asking it because I maintain clamav at FreeBSD ports and I tested all dependant ports with clam 0.95-RC1 and notified maintainers of all