[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 02/22/2005
08:05:51:
Please do not use cl_scanbuff at all, it's to be removed in 0.90.
This
function only supports old type signature scanning and will miss many
viruses (just try to scan test/clam.exe). You should definitely use
cl_scanfile/cl_scandesc instead.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 02/22/2005
09:43:09:
On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 09:41:31 -0300
Aecio F. Neto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Too bad scanbuff is being retired. I really enjoy the idea of
mem
buffer scanning.
Is there any plan to improve and keep it or removal of it *is*
a fact?
I
I am using a linux debian under a sparc64
(Sun 4 Ultra - Ultrasparc II) for a mail gateway system.
This box runs qmail + qmail-scanner
+ clamav to filter virus messages.
We are experiencing a very high load
on this box. Diabling qmail-scanner (that calls clamd) results in having
this box under
I am testing a scanning module using
clamav lib and I noticed that some virus are missing from clamav db.
I am not saying that my db misses them,
I am saying that clamav db cannot find all virus listed in a web site I
discover.
Because I am not sure who to report
this, here goes the site
