Re: RE: [Clamav-devel] why don't write portable code

2006-04-01 Thread BSCH
] To: 'ClamAV Development' clamav-devel@lists.clamav.net Subject: RE: [Clamav-devel] why don't write portable code Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 19:07:32 -0500 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 Thread-Index: AcZVFl8cPxgzSxkuRISADJDEue5QoQACR8zQ In-Reply

Re: RE: [Clamav-devel] why don't write portable code

2006-04-01 Thread BSCH
, 31 Mar 2006 18:07:41 -0600 From: Brian A. Reiter [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'ClamAV Development' clamav-devel@lists.clamav.net Subject: RE: [Clamav-devel] why don't write portable code Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 19:07:32 -0500 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook

Re: RE: [Clamav-devel] why don't write portable code

2006-04-01 Thread GiM
BSCH in message 'Re: [Clamav-devel] why don't write portable code' wrote: Brian A. Reiter! if engine design pure. the others could use the clamav engine to write anti-virus software. the software not to write by us. ALL could use the engine convenience. I don't think you

Re: Re: RE: [Clamav-devel] why don't write portable code

2006-04-01 Thread BSCH
c or c++. === 2006-04-01 23:10:09 您在来信中写道:=== BSCH in message 'Re: [Clamav-devel] why don't write portable code' wrote: Brian A. Reiter! if engine design pure. the others could use the clamav engine to write anti-virus software. the software not to write by us. ALL could use

RE: Re: RE: [Clamav-devel] why don't write portable code

2006-04-01 Thread Nigel Horne
GiM,您好! your said Programming in these environments is totaly different, and creating one universal engine wouldn't be reasonable. YOU COULD NOT PROOF IT. The engine is pure! It only match signature one a file! match signature could use standar c or c++. I strongly suggest that we

Re: [Clamav-devel] why don't write portable code

2006-03-31 Thread Tomasz Kojm
On Sat, 1 Apr 2006 05:19:35 +0800 梁飞 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: clamav-devel,您好! why don't you write portable code? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/POSIX if some function must use dependent platform API, we could implement it using macro at runtime. e.g, visit a directory are difference in

Re: Re: [Clamav-devel] why don't write portable code

2006-03-31 Thread 梁飞
Tomasz Kojm,您好! but in fact, engine is pure. Most of commercial AV has Linux and Win32 version. so... the engine could be design the independ OS, why don't you code that? i know it maybe use some time to write it, but i think it valuealbe. ONE ENGINE IS A CORE OF SOFTWARE. and why

Re: [Clamav-devel] why don't write portable code

2006-03-31 Thread Tomasz Kojm
On Sat, 1 Apr 2006 06:21:53 +0800 梁飞 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Tomasz Kojm,您好! but in fact, engine is pure. Most of commercial AV has Linux and Win32 version. so... the engine could be design the independ OS, why don't you code that? http://www.clamav.net/abstract.html#pagestart Clam

RE: [Clamav-devel] why don't write portable code

2006-03-31 Thread Brian A. Reiter
i know it maybe use some time to write it, but i think it valuealbe. ONE ENGINE IS A CORE OF SOFTWARE. and why don't you design it indepent platform? if possible, the directory maybe plot clearly, the same The engine is POSIX compliant. And, in fact, Microsoft has made a