Re: [clamav-users] [ext] MBL_17713260 false positive!

2018-10-26 Thread Steve Basford
On 26 October 2018 12:30:45 Paul Stead wrote: Woo, more - MBL_17674787 MBL_17784910 Personally I'd stop using them... as Malware Patrol don't seem to want to improve the situation. So although I do whitelist.. like I have with the above ones... it'll be an ongoing task/pain. Tried

Re: [clamav-users] [ext] MBL_17713260 false positive!

2018-10-26 Thread Paul Stead
Woo, more - MBL_17674787 MBL_17784910 Tried to post to the Sanesecurity list but didn't seem to come through ( Paul -- Paul Stead Senior Engineer (Tools & Technology) Zen Internet Direct: 01706 902018 Web: zen.co.uk Winner of 'Services Company of the Year' at the UK IT Industry Awards This

Re: [clamav-users] [ext] MBL_17713260 false positive!

2018-10-24 Thread Alex
> As a follow-up, in response to a question as to why they just block I meant "don't just block", of course ... ___ clamav-users mailing list clamav-users@lists.clamav.net http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users Help us build a

Re: [clamav-users] [ext] MBL_17713260 false positive!

2018-10-24 Thread Alex
Hi, > * Alex : > > Another malwarepatrol fp for docs.google.com > > > > # sigtool --find-sigs MBL_17713260 |sigtool --decode-sigs > > VIRUS NAME: MBL_17713260 > > TARGET TYPE: ANY FILE > > OFFSET: * > > DECODED SIGNATURE: > > https://docs.google.com > > > > I don't even know what to do anymore.

Re: [clamav-users] [ext] MBL_17713260 false positive!

2018-10-24 Thread Steve Basford
On Wed, October 24, 2018 9:05 am, Al Varnell wrote: > I cannot argue that malware does not show up in Google Docs which is wide > open to anybody that wants to post there, as I know it has occurred. Not > sure how big a problem it has become for Google to police. I think it > would be better if

Re: [clamav-users] [ext] MBL_17713260 false positive!

2018-10-24 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
* Al Varnell : > I cannot argue that malware does not show up in Google Docs which is > wide open to anybody that wants to post there, Amen to that! > as I know it has occurred. Not sure how big a problem it has become for > Google to police. I think it would be better if malwarepatrol were to

Re: [clamav-users] [ext] MBL_17713260 false positive!

2018-10-24 Thread Al Varnell
I cannot argue that malware does not show up in Google Docs which is wide open to anybody that wants to post there, as I know it has occurred. Not sure how big a problem it has become for Google to police. I think it would be better if malwarepatrol were to list the specific site where the

Re: [clamav-users] [ext] MBL_17713260 false positive!

2018-10-24 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
* Alex : > Another malwarepatrol fp for docs.google.com > > # sigtool --find-sigs MBL_17713260 |sigtool --decode-sigs > VIRUS NAME: MBL_17713260 > TARGET TYPE: ANY FILE > OFFSET: * > DECODED SIGNATURE: > https://docs.google.com > > I don't even know what to do anymore. Is it worth it to keep