Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-milter

2004-01-29 Thread Eduardo Kaftanski
On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 10:55:27AM +0100, Kri?tof Petr wrote: Mailing Lists wrote: Sure, do you have the src RPM so I can build for RH9 or will Fedora binary work? I am running 0.60, not 0.65 it is not good idea to install fedora binaries on old RH versions. Rebuild src package on your

Re: [Clamav-users] Milter timeouts.

2004-01-29 Thread Tomasz Kojm
On Tue, 27 Jan 2004 15:57:13 -0700 Spike Ilacqua [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: And suggestions? The only guess I have is that it's being overwhelmed by the volume (this mail server delivers about 50K inbound message per day). I'm hopping there is some knob I can turn to help it keep up. As you

Re: [Clamav-users] Correction to my last post regarding viruses not found

2004-01-29 Thread Jim Maul
Actually, it technically is clamscan, but for the installation i used (www.qmailrocks.org) a step in there says to copy clamscan to clamdscan so running clamscan and clamdscan effectively means the same thing. So yes technically you are correct, but for my setup, my statement is correct as well.

Re: [Clamav-users] Freshclam timeout with version devel-20040127 is too short {Scanned}

2004-01-29 Thread Tomasz Papszun
On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 at 12:12:59 +, Jo Mills wrote: I have tried to use freshclam from the cvs version devel-20040127, but after 20 minutes it times out. My job shows the following: Starting the daily download of the clamAV virus databases to the Labserver at Wed Jan 28 11:39:26 GMT

Re: [Clamav-users] RE: Clamav-milter not installing

2004-01-29 Thread Nigel Horne
On Wednesday 28 Jan 2004 2:00 pm, james nelson wrote: Afirmative. I compiled sendmail with milter support. The .configure reported no on milter items, so I manualy built libmilter and installed it. Now .configure reports yes on milter items, but still the clamav-milter never gets built. I

Re: [Clamav-users] Clamdscan problem

2004-01-29 Thread Thomas Lamy
Jose R. Ortiz Ubarri wrote: # clamdscan readme.zip /root/readme.zip: Can't access the file ERROR --- SCAN SUMMARY --- Infected files: 0 Time: 0.001 sec (0 m 0 s) And everything I try to scan gives me the same ERROR. I suspect clamd is not running as root, and an ordinary user

Re: [Clamav-users] Re: SCO.a not being caught at all

2004-01-29 Thread Tomasz Papszun
On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 at 15:23:28 +0100, Dirk Meyer wrote: I Verified on 3 diffrent systems (cvs 2004-01-20 running) clamscan detects, clamdscan not. When I stop clamd and strat it again it works. Problem: after freshclam updates, clamddon#t catch the new signatures. Question: How can

RE: [Clamav-users] Worm.SCO.A

2004-01-29 Thread Randal, Phil
ClamAV was picking up the original version here 6 hours before McAfee had their 4319 DATs out, and detected the B variant here yesterday at least 4 hours before McAfee's 4320 DATs were released. You guys deserve medals. A big heartfelt thank you to all the ClamAV team (and virus submitters).

RE: [Clamav-users] RE: Clamav-milter not installing

2004-01-29 Thread james nelson
Afirmative. I compiled sendmail with milter support. The .configure reported no on milter items, so I manualy built libmilter and installed it. Now .configure reports yes on milter items, but still the clamav-milter never gets built. I will check my make logs to see if I have the same bomb out

RE: [Clamav-users] Worm.SCO.A

2004-01-29 Thread Fritz Mesedilla
They are the same. AV vendors just have their way of naming the same virus. We call it Worm.SCO.A. McAfee calls it MyDoom. Symantec calls it Novarg. Cheers, fritz www.mesedilla.com --- + Basta Ikaw Lord -Original Message- From: Patricia Viana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent:

Re: [Clamav-users] SCO.a

2004-01-29 Thread Shawn Tayler
On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 17:34:33 + Nigel Horne [EMAIL PROTECTED] exclaimed: This comment has been obseleted by the changes to today's CVS snapshot. Shawn -Nigel Excellent Thanks --- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon

Re: [Clamav-users] Worm.SCO.A

2004-01-29 Thread Jeff Gojkovich
You are exactly right. Hit us on Monday and hasn't stopped since. -- Jeff Hi. My SMTP filter running ClamAV is blocking a huge amount of messages with the Worm.SCO.A. It seams to be the same virus as MyDoom or Novarg. Can anyone confirm this?! Thanks. Att,

Re: [Clamav-users] yahoo groups??

2004-01-29 Thread Tomasz Papszun
On Mon, 26 Jan 2004 at 18:20:28 -0600, Internet Helpdesk wrote: I've got a user who says yahoo groups is getting an error message when trying to send an email to our email server. Here's a part of the transcript from the customer: [...] Remote host said: 550 5.7.1 Virus detected by ClamAV

[Clamav-users] Clamscan; clamdscan

2004-01-29 Thread Micha Silver
Last night I made a small change to qmail-scanner.pl- I added 'worm.sco.a' to the array $silent_viruses_array. (To prevent sending Virus Found messages to innocent sender addresses) It now looks like: my @silent_viruses_array=('klez','bugbear','worm.sco.a','hybris','yaha','braid'

Re: [Clamav-users] fyi: 0.65 on OSX

2004-01-29 Thread Tomasz Kojm
On Fri, 23 Jan 2004 16:12:10 -0800 Mark Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well, despite my better judgement I decided to go ahead and install clamav-devel-20040110 on my OSX 10.1.5 machine. Seems to work well, as far as I can tell. Tests run fine. The only issues I've had are freshclam's

Re: [Clamav-users] SOT: SCO.A disappearing?

2004-01-29 Thread Jessica Ruble-English
Still getting plenty SCO.A's over herer too. Has anybody started seeing the variant MyDoom.B yet? Jessica On Thu, 29 Jan 2004 08:19, Jeffrey L. Taylor wrote: I noticed that the virus count has dropped back to pre-SCO.A levels starting around 0330 UTC this morning. I have not seen a single SCO.A

Re: [Clamav-users] Version 0.66? (was RE: VBA decoding, update)

2004-01-29 Thread Tomasz Kojm
On Mon, 26 Jan 2004 13:29:19 +0100 Thomas Lamy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hm, I thought you would release 0.66 /without/ OLE2 and VBA, to make it a real _stable_ version. Then 0.67-dev could come up with OLE2 and The CVS version is still broken (see thread timeout related threads in last weeks)