On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 10:55:27AM +0100, Kri?tof Petr wrote:
Mailing Lists wrote:
Sure, do you have the src RPM so I can build for RH9 or will Fedora
binary work? I am running 0.60, not 0.65
it is not good idea to install fedora binaries on old RH versions.
Rebuild src package on your
On Tue, 27 Jan 2004 15:57:13 -0700
Spike Ilacqua [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And suggestions? The only guess I have is that it's being overwhelmed
by the volume (this mail server delivers about 50K inbound message per
day). I'm hopping there is some knob I can turn to help it keep up.
As you
Actually, it technically is clamscan, but for the installation i used
(www.qmailrocks.org) a step in there says to copy clamscan to clamdscan so
running clamscan and clamdscan effectively means the same thing. So yes
technically you are correct, but for my setup, my statement is correct as
well.
On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 at 12:12:59 +, Jo Mills wrote:
I have tried to use freshclam from the cvs version devel-20040127, but
after 20 minutes it times out. My job shows the following:
Starting the daily download of the clamAV virus databases to the
Labserver at Wed Jan 28 11:39:26 GMT
On Wednesday 28 Jan 2004 2:00 pm, james nelson wrote:
Afirmative. I compiled sendmail with milter support. The .configure
reported no on milter items, so I manualy built libmilter and installed it.
Now .configure reports yes on milter items, but still the clamav-milter
never gets built. I
Jose R. Ortiz Ubarri wrote:
# clamdscan readme.zip
/root/readme.zip: Can't access the file ERROR
--- SCAN SUMMARY ---
Infected files: 0
Time: 0.001 sec (0 m 0 s)
And everything I try to scan gives me the same ERROR.
I suspect clamd is not running as root, and an ordinary user
On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 at 15:23:28 +0100, Dirk Meyer wrote:
I Verified on 3 diffrent systems (cvs 2004-01-20 running)
clamscan detects, clamdscan not.
When I stop clamd and strat it again it works.
Problem:
after freshclam updates, clamddon#t catch the new signatures.
Question:
How can
ClamAV was picking up the original version here 6 hours before McAfee had
their 4319 DATs out, and detected the B variant here yesterday at least 4
hours before McAfee's 4320 DATs were released.
You guys deserve medals.
A big heartfelt thank you to all the ClamAV team (and virus submitters).
Afirmative. I compiled sendmail with milter support. The .configure
reported no on milter items, so I manualy built libmilter and installed it.
Now .configure reports yes on milter items, but still the clamav-milter
never gets built. I will check my make logs to see if I have the same bomb
out
They are the same. AV vendors just have their way of naming the same virus.
We call it Worm.SCO.A. McAfee calls it MyDoom. Symantec calls it Novarg.
Cheers,
fritz www.mesedilla.com
---
+ Basta Ikaw Lord
-Original Message-
From: Patricia Viana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 17:34:33 + Nigel Horne [EMAIL PROTECTED]
exclaimed:
This comment has been obseleted by the changes to today's CVS snapshot.
Shawn
-Nigel
Excellent Thanks
---
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon
You are exactly right. Hit us on Monday and hasn't stopped since.
--
Jeff
Hi.
My SMTP filter running ClamAV is blocking a huge amount of messages
with the Worm.SCO.A.
It seams to be the same virus as MyDoom or Novarg.
Can anyone confirm this?!
Thanks.
Att,
On Mon, 26 Jan 2004 at 18:20:28 -0600, Internet Helpdesk wrote:
I've got a user who says yahoo groups is getting an error message when
trying to send an email to our email server.
Here's a part of the transcript from the customer:
[...]
Remote host said: 550 5.7.1 Virus detected by ClamAV
Last night I made a small change to qmail-scanner.pl- I added 'worm.sco.a'
to the array $silent_viruses_array. (To prevent sending Virus Found messages
to innocent sender addresses)
It now looks like:
my
@silent_viruses_array=('klez','bugbear','worm.sco.a','hybris','yaha','braid'
On Fri, 23 Jan 2004 16:12:10 -0800
Mark Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, despite my better judgement I decided to go ahead and install
clamav-devel-20040110 on my OSX 10.1.5 machine. Seems to work well,
as far as I can tell. Tests run fine.
The only issues I've had are freshclam's
Still getting plenty SCO.A's over herer too.
Has anybody started seeing the variant MyDoom.B yet?
Jessica
On Thu, 29 Jan 2004 08:19, Jeffrey L. Taylor wrote:
I noticed that the virus count has dropped back to pre-SCO.A levels
starting around 0330 UTC this morning. I have not seen a single SCO.A
On Mon, 26 Jan 2004 13:29:19 +0100
Thomas Lamy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hm, I thought you would release 0.66 /without/ OLE2 and VBA, to make
it a real _stable_ version. Then 0.67-dev could come up with OLE2 and
The CVS version is still broken (see thread timeout related threads in
last weeks)
17 matches
Mail list logo