It seems, that currently clamav stops scanning file, when it
finds that it's infected. But for testing purposes it would be nice,
if there would be swetch to run full db scan - so that the for file
infected with multiple viruses allt of them would be recognized. For
example - I
Hi,
I'm testing signatures extraction with a 'home-made' virus : I extract
a piece of a binary file (jpeg file), and put it into a test.virus.db
I use the creating signature manual to take a good string (size
between 40 and 200, etc).
I put this test.virus.db into my database directory (with
Please don't use it yet - it will be back in the next week.
That's excellent news! Thanks Tomasz!
--Claudio
Los mejores usados y las más tentadoras
ofertas de 0km están en Yahoo! Autos.
Comprá o vendé tu auto en
http://autos.yahoo.com.ar
I was looking for reviews on virus protection quality as well as response
time...
Helen, the editor of virusbtn.com says as far as she knows, Clam AV has
never been submitted for review.
I asked for details on the process, and ask here if there is any reason NOT
to submit to various reviewers -
Hello Tomasz,
TP On Tue, 24 Feb 2004 at 11:05:32 +0100, David Girardey wrote:
I'm testing signatures extraction with a 'home-made' virus : I extract
a piece of a binary file (jpeg file), and put it into a test.virus.db
TP No. First you must do a hex dump of the binary fragment. It's
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:clamav-users-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mitch (WebCob)
Sent: 24. februar 2004 14:46
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Clamav-users] Submission to virusbtn.com and AV-test.org?
I was given a pdf of a response time article
On Tuesday 24 February 2004 1:46 pm, Mitch (WebCob) wrote:
I was given a pdf of a response time article written by Andreas
Marx at AV-test.org, but on a side note, she thinks he was unofficially
stating that Clam AV had only a 56% rate detection of virii in the wild -
I'd say my experience is
On Tue, 24 Feb 2004 at 15:46:18 +0100, David Girardey wrote:
I'm testing signatures extraction with a 'home-made' virus : I extract
a piece of a binary file (jpeg file), and put it into a test.virus.db
TP No. First you must do a hex dump of the binary fragment. It's described
TP in the
Hello,
I receive this mail from
Cron [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/local/bin/freshclam --quiet -l
/var/log/clam-update.log :
ERROR: Verification: Broken or not a CVD file.
ERROR: Verification: Broken or not a CVD file.
ERROR: Verification: Broken or not a CVD file.
When I manually run freshclam it
On Tuesday 24 February 2004 8:36 pm, Niber wrote:
Hello,
I receive this mail from
Cron [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/local/bin/freshclam --quiet -l
/var/log/clam-update.log :
ERROR: Verification: Broken or not a CVD file.
When I manually run freshclam it looks fine
Where is the problem with
One or two times
Thanks for your help
Niber
Antony Stone a écrit :
Do you always receive the error from the cron job, or did it just happen one
or two times?
Antony.
---
SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now.
Build and
On Wednesday 25 February 2004 12:24 am, Niber wrote:
Antony Stone a écrit :
Do you always receive the error from the cron job, or did it just happen
one or two times?
One or two times
I would say that is normal then, simply due to synchronisation problems of
the signatures database on
Virgo Pärna sighed and wrote::
It seems, that currently clamav stops scanning file, when it
finds that it's infected. But for testing purposes it would be nice,
if there would be swetch to run full db scan - so that the for file
But wouldn't that waste cpu cycles when it has already
Hello.
Sometimes I see in maillog:
Feb 25 04:03:59 clamav-milter[7350]: clamfi_header: Received: from 192.168.1.1
([192.168.1.1]) by mail(WinRoute Pro 4.1)
with SMTP; Tue, 24 Feb 2004 21:34:29 +0400
Feb 25 04:03:59 clamav-milter[7350]: clamfi_header: From: XX
Feb 25 04:03:59
14 matches
Mail list logo
