On Wed, 28 Apr 2004 08:20:03 +1000
Bill Maidment [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My point is that if we could make the names of the processes more
distinguishable and match the conf files (if any) then we remove the
chance of error. For example clamscan could be renamed to scanclam
(with NO
Don Levey wrote:
Apr 27 21:38:54 davinci sendmail[7174]: i3S1csjm007174:
from=[EMAIL PROTECTED], size=700, class=0, nrcpts=1,
msgid=[EMAIL PROTECTED], proto=ESMTP,
daemon=MTA, relay=smtp03.mrf.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.62]
Apr 27 21:42:54 davinci sendmail[7174]: i3S1csjm007174: Milter
(clmilter):
Christian Hack [EMAIL PROTECTED] ???/ ?
?: news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm running an old RH6.2 based box, which does most things OK for now
(it's
still kernel 2.2 though). I'm looking to upgrade soon, but would like to
get
ClamAV going on it for now.
When I run
Hi
First of all: Kudos to the ClamAV team it's so useful in stopping worms.
On to my question:
For some reason, clamav is labelling almost each virus it finds in
incoming mail as Win32.Mix like so
Wed Apr 28 12:28:30 2004 -
/var/spool/qmailscan/tmp/mx2108314810947010970/data.rtf
On Wed, 2004-04-28 at 05:57, Joe Maimon wrote:
Don Levey wrote:
Apr 27 21:38:54 davinci sendmail[7174]: i3S1csjm007174:
from=[EMAIL PROTECTED], size=700, class=0, nrcpts=1,
msgid=[EMAIL PROTECTED], proto=ESMTP,
daemon=MTA, relay=smtp03.mrf.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.62]
Apr 27 21:42:54
This is actualy a lot worse than I thought.
Apr 27 04:25:50 nameserver2 clamav-milter[4431]: ClamAv: private data
not NULL
Apr 27 04:25:50 nameserver2 clamav-milter[4417]: ClamAv: private data
not NULL
Apr 27 04:25:52 nameserver2 clamav-milter[4427]: ClamAv: private data
not NULL
Apr 27
Don Levey wrote:
On
My sendmail and sendmail-devel are both 8.12.8-9.90.
Is this known to cause problems? Thanks again!
-Don
I dont know. Perhaps you would like to try compiling
sendmail,libmilter,clamav from source?
---
This
On Fri, 2004-04-23 at 14:40, Stephen Gran wrote:
What DOES read clamav.conf?
clamd, clamdscan, and clamav-milter. freshclam also looks at it to find
out how to notify clamd if you have it set to notify clamd after updates.
It _is_ in the various docs, you know :)
The RPM I'm using has a
Hello Tomasz,
Monday, April 26, 2004, 11:56:22 PM, you wrote:
TK On Mon, 26 Apr 2004 19:21:15 +0400
TK Marin Alexey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello, clamav-users,
Using Clamav above 3 month.
Now prepare to deal with realtime DRBL blocking for virus-source hosts
(above 100 hosts/messages
We are using clamd and clamscan for our mail and are very pleased with
it. Keep up the good work.
I was wondering if it is possible to scan streams too (http-traffic, ...)?
Marc
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g
Get certified
On Wed, 28 Apr 2004 at 13:42:07 +0200, Ralf Guenthner wrote:
First of all: Kudos to the ClamAV team it's so useful in stopping worms.
On to my question:
For some reason, clamav is labelling almost each virus it finds in
incoming mail as Win32.Mix like so
Wed Apr 28 12:28:30 2004 -
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Don Levey wrote:
On
My sendmail and sendmail-devel are both 8.12.8-9.90.
Is this known to cause problems? Thanks again!
-Don
I dont know. Perhaps you would like to try compiling
sendmail,libmilter,clamav from source?
Well, I'm willing to try most anything
I'm getting similar errors during make, however I can't see an answer in the
error ;-)
Snip
depmode=gcc3 /bin/sh ../depcomp \
/bin/sh ../libtool --mode=compile gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I..
-I./zziplib-g -O2 -c -o matcher.lo `test -f 'matcher.c' || echo
'./'`matcher.c
../libtool: line
I guess that you use very old database - Win32.Mix isn't present in
the database since the end of February 2004.
Tomasz,
thanks a lot for replying. I'm afraid that's not the problem, though.
Here's the result of a fresclam:
ClamAV update process started at Wed Apr 28 16:00:00 2004
SECURITY
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Don Levey wrote:
On
My sendmail and sendmail-devel are both 8.12.8-9.90.
Is this known to cause problems? Thanks again!
-Don
I dont know. Perhaps you would like to try compiling
sendmail,libmilter,clamav from source?
You mentioned that the code shown in
Ralf Guenthner wrote:
ClamAV update process started at Wed Apr 28 16:00:00 2004
SECURITY WARNING: NO SUPPORT FOR DIGITAL SIGNATURES
main.cvd is up to date (version: 22, sigs: 20229, f-level: 1, builder:
tkojm)
daily.cvd is up to date (version: 291, sigs: 1072, f-level: 2, builder:
ccordes)
What
I actually had to load:
gnump
Description is GNU MP3 Streaming?? but once I installed that package it
all worked...
Running SuSE 9 pro
On Apr 23, 2004, at 10:26 AM, Alex S Moore wrote:
On Fri, 2004-04-23 at 10:07, McWhirter,Julia wrote:
Can you just verify gmp-devel is part of gmp?
I think
I'm getting similar errors during make, however I can't see an answer in the
error ;-)
Snip
depmode=gcc3 /bin/sh ../depcomp \
/bin/sh ../libtool --mode=compile gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I..
-I./zziplib-g -O2 -c -o matcher.lo `test -f 'matcher.c' || echo
'./'`matcher.c
On Wed, 28 Apr 2004 at 16:09:57 +0200, Ralf Guenthner wrote:
I guess that you use very old database - Win32.Mix isn't present in
the database since the end of February 2004.
Tomasz,
thanks a lot for replying. I'm afraid that's not the problem, though.
Here's the result of a fresclam:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ralf
Guenthner
Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2004 10:10 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] Clam assigns wrong virus name??
I guess that you use very old database - Win32.Mix isn't
On Wednesday, April 28, 2004, 4:09:57 PM, Ralf Guenthner wrote:
I guess that you use very old database - Win32.Mix isn't present in
the database since the end of February 2004.
RG Tomasz,
RG thanks a lot for replying. I'm afraid that's not the problem, though.
RG Here's the result of a
On Wed, 28 Apr 2004 16:50:19 +0100
Huw Jenkins wrote:
snip
/usr/bin/ld: -o: multiply specified
make[2]: *** [libclamav.la] Error 1
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make: *** [all] Error 2
/snip
Each time I have had a compilation error, it's been down to an oldish version
of gcc on
Ralf Guenthner wrote:
I guess that you use very old database - Win32.Mix isn't present in
the database since the end of February 2004.
sigtool -l |grep -i mix
..
..
W32.Mix.1852
Tomasz,
thanks a lot for replying. I'm afraid that's not the problem, though.
Here's the result of a fresclam:
ClamAV
Apologies for the top post, I've had a long day :(
I've made some progress, running $export SED=sed seems to fix the original
error. However I have another problem. The following error message will
hopefully shed some light on my problems:
snip
/usr/bin/ld: -o: multiply specified
make[2]: ***
Greeting,
I just installed Clam on a Linux server. After installation, I run #clamscan
/usr/local/share/clamav/test, it found the virus, the output like this:
-
/usr/local/share/clamav/test/test1: ClamAV-Test-Signature FOUND
Wed Apr 28 12:28:30 2004 -
/var/spool/qmailscan/tmp/mx2108314810947010970/data.rtf
.scr: Win32.Mix FOUND
I am sure that is rather a sample of the Netsky worm, which other systems
running clam identify as Worm.Somefool.xx
What could be the cause of the wrong name?
Clamav is having it's own
Victor Yu wrote:
Greeting,
I just installed Clam on a Linux server. After installation, I run #clamscan
/usr/local/share/clamav/test, it found the virus, the output like this:
-
/usr/local/share/clamav/test/test1:
I currently have ClamAV (0.65) and Sendmail running on the same
server Pentium 200 MHz.
ClamAV scans inbound and outbound mails for Sendmail via local TCP
(localhost, port )
The performance is not that great given the specs of the server.
I have a Windows 2000 Advance Server on a AMD 2.6 GHz
Zoong Pham wrote:
Can I install ClamAV on the Window server and have it scanning
inbound and outbound mails for the mail server on the old Pentium ?
If you use clamav-milter, the answer is yes.
If you use other glues (e.g. mail-scanner, amavis, etc.) that depends
on the glue.
Try man
-Original Message-
From: Fajar A. Nugraha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 29 April 2004 12:05 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] ClamAV on Windows and Sendmail on Unix
If you use clamav-milter, the answer is yes.
If you use other glues (e.g.
30 matches
Mail list logo