-Original Message-
From: Robin Lynn Frank [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 18 June 2004 02:48 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Clamav-users] password protected zip files
emails with the eicar test virus in password protected zip files were not
caught.
On Friday 18 June 2004 03:12 am, Simon Fishley wrote:
When you think about it though - does it really matter if you don't stop a
virus in an encrypted archive file? Unless the recipient knows the
password there is very little risk of damage. Not a very successful way of
getting a virus to
On Friday 18 June 2004 9:12 am, Simon Fishley wrote:
When you think about it though - does it really matter if you don't stop a
virus in an encrypted archive file? Unless the recipient knows the
password there is very little risk of damage. Not a very successful way of
getting a virus to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello all,
Does anyone have working QS Statistics with the above version of QS? The
statistics were working OK until I upgraded to 1.22st - now my
statistics look like this - http://www.sk-branik.si/qss =(
- --
Thanks for the info and have a nice day,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andrej Trobentar wrote:
| Hello all,
|
| Does anyone have working QS Statistics with the above version of QS? The
| statistics were working OK until I upgraded to 1.22st - now my
| statistics look like this - http://www.sk-branik.si/qss =(
Ups, sorry,
Quoting Bill Randle [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Thu, 2004-06-17 at 19:16, Michael D. Crawford wrote:
I think the virus that's assaulting me is what this
page calls the PE_ZAFI.B virus:
http://www.trendmicro.com/vinfo/virusencyclo/default5.asp?VName=PE_ZAFI.BVSect=T
The clamav database lists a virus
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
hi,
after having clamav up and running for a while -- it's great! thanks to
all who develop || support it -- there's still another topic in status
'wip': how to uncompress .sit, .sitx, and .hqx files (usually
sent/received by Mac users)?
i asked
Good Morning!
Some time ago I installed clamav from source on a FreeBSD 5.0 machine
that was also running Sendmail 8.12.10 and SA 2.63. Sendmail immediately
complained that it couldn't allocate any memory, so I abandoned the
project. At the time, I chalked it up to a FreeBSD issue. The 5.x tree
On Fri, 18 Jun 2004 09:25:31 +0100
Antony Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 18 June 2004 9:12 am, Simon Fishley wrote:
When you think about it though - does it really matter if you don't
stop a virus in an encrypted archive file? Unless the recipient
knows the password there is
On Fri, 18 Jun 2004 at 15:24:27 +0200, Timo Schöler wrote:
after having clamav up and running for a while -- it's great! thanks to
all who develop || support it -- there's still another topic in status
'wip': how to uncompress .sit, .sitx, and .hqx files (usually
sent/received by Mac
On Friday 18 June 2004 06:29 am, Jim Maul wrote:
Its also interesting to note that even before clamav detected zafi it
was being
blocked by qmail-scanner:
Jun 15 12:25:19 external qmail-scanner[29017]:
Policy:Bad_MIME_Break:RC:0(24.188.90.209):SA:1(10.5/5.0): 2.184665 18140
[EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On Friday 18 June 2004 01:12, Simon Fishley wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Robin Lynn Frank [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 18 June 2004 02:48 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Clamav-users] password protected zip files
emails
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On Friday 18 June 2004 04:25, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
ClamAV is
able to detect it (in contrast to many commercial scanners) and there's
no need to reeject all encrypted files.
If you note my original post, password-protected zips were getting by
On Thursday 17 June 2004 18:01, Matt wrote:
#ArchiveDetectEncrypted
Hmm, my config file had #ArchiveBlockEncrypted
I uncommented it and restarted clamd, but I wonder which is the correct one?
- --
I could be wrong, but I think the later versions still accept the older syntax,
so
On Fri, 18 Jun 2004 08:31:55 -0700
Robin Lynn Frank [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On Friday 18 June 2004 04:25, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
ClamAV is
able to detect it (in contrast to many commercial scanners) and
there's no need to reeject all
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On Friday 18 June 2004 10:46, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
In your original post you mentioned a problem with detection of the test
#12 from testvirus.org. I consider this particular test (encrypted eicar
test file) rather useless and stupefying and
I've been using formail, procmail and clamav to
disinect a 200 MB mailbox, and since last night it's
only processed 80 MB of mail so far. It's a 350 Mhz
box that I'm running it on, and clamav must be pretty
CPU intensive.
Somebody tipped me off to the following procmail
config, which filters on
Hi All,
I have just compiled ClamAV and have started playing out with it,
however after reading though the man pages I have been unable to find an
easy way of determining the current version or date of the Virus DB
files. The --version switch the freshclam only reports the version of
Lee W wrote:
Hi All,
I have just compiled ClamAV and have started playing out with it,
however after reading though the man pages I have been unable to find an
easy way of determining the current version or date of the Virus DB
files. The --version switch the freshclam only reports the version
On Fri, 18 Jun 2004 at 15:08:32 -0700, Michael D. Crawford wrote:
I've been using formail, procmail and clamav to
disinect a 200 MB mailbox, and since last night it's
only processed 80 MB of mail so far. It's a 350 Mhz
That's a very slow progress! I suspect you use clamscan. So clamscan is
Ryan Moore said:
Lee W wrote:
Hi All,
I have just compiled ClamAV and have started playing out with it,
however after reading though the man pages I have been unable to find an
easy way of determining the current version or date of the Virus DB
files. The --version switch the freshclam
A list member suggested running clamd as root (temporarily, of course).
Sendmail no longer complains. I'm getting the following error now...
clamav-milter[17693]: Expected port information from clamd, got ''
sm-mta[17703]: i5J2IuTg017703: Milter: data, reject=451 4.7.1 Please try
again later
22 matches
Mail list logo
