Re: [Clamav-users] [OT] Top posting is harmful. (Was: Clamd Problem.)

2005-12-18 Thread Joe Polk
snip If you had not top posted, and properly trimmed the message like you should, you would have noticed that you were replying to the wrong email. -Jeremy snip Hey, I understand that top-posting or not-posting is really import to some people but to go so far as to say it's harmful is

Re: [Clamav-users] [OT] Top posting is harmful. (Was: Clamd Problem.)

2005-12-18 Thread clamav
At 10:17 AM 12/18/2005, you wrote: Actually, the is harmful phrase, if anything, refers to Edsger W. Dijkstra's famous paper in 1968 titled Go To Statement Considered Harmful. Tom's article about csh came many decades later. I guess it makes me really old, to have read the Dijkstra paper, but

Re: [Clamav-users] [OT] Top posting is harmful. (Was: Clamd Problem.)

2005-12-18 Thread mark
Comone people. I'm tired of seeing people interrupt threads with self-righteous rants about how poor in taste 'top-posting' is to them. We can all read, top, or bottom. Bandwidth is cheap. Nobody is forcing you to read. I'm also tired of people whining about other ridiculous things, such as the

Re: [Clamav-users] [OT] Top posting is harmful. (Was: Clamd Problem.)

2005-12-18 Thread clamav
On Sun, Dec 18, 2005 at 01:50:52PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Comone people. I'm tired of seeing people interrupt threads with self-righteous rants about how poor in taste 'top-posting' is to them. {SNIP} I think the phrase get a life applies. :-) {SNIP} Cheers, mark Actually,

Re: [Clamav-users] [OT] Top posting is harmful. (Was: Clamd Problem.)

2005-12-18 Thread Dennis Peterson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Comone people. I'm tired of seeing people interrupt threads with self-righteous rants about how poor in taste 'top-posting' is to them. I dislike huge sigs. Especially ones that try to be as cute as they are pointless. Yours is particularly offensive as it is both.

Re: [Clamav-users] [OT] Top posting is harmful. (Was: Clamd Problem.)

2005-12-18 Thread Jeremy Kitchen
On Sunday 18 December 2005 11:12 am, Joe Polk wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Actually, it doesn't matter what opinions anyone may have, it *is* against the rules. Agreed. Not because it's harmful, but because they do not want it on this list. it clearly is harmful. the mistaken email

Re: [Clamav-users] [OT] Top posting is harmful. (Was: Clamd Problem.)

2005-12-18 Thread mark
On Sun, Dec 18, 2005 at 08:15:37PM -0800, Jeremy Kitchen wrote: it clearly is harmful. the mistaken email (which, I have decreed, would have been avoided had the user not top-posted) spent approximately 25MB of the list server's bandwidth (assuming there are about 5k subscribers to the list)

Re: [Clamav-users] [OT] Top posting is harmful. (Was: Clamd Problem.)

2005-12-18 Thread Cami
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 12:08:14AM +, Stephen Gran wrote: I'm glad you have your opinion. The opinions of those who admin the list happen to coincide with mine, and we both disagree with you. You don't mind if we don't give out free support when you deliberately

[Clamav-users] [OT] pgp is annoying, was: [OT] Top posting is harmful.

2005-12-18 Thread Leif Neland
Original Message From: Jeremy Kitchen [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: ClamAV users ML clamav-users@lists.clamav.net Sent: Monday, December 19, 2005 5:15 AM Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] [OT] Top posting is harmful. (Was: Clamd Problem.) ___