On Thu, Feb 16, 2006 at 11:47:00PM -0500, Steve Feehan said:
Hi. I have installed the Debian clamav-milter package. I've configured
sendmail to use it and everything seems to be working OK.
clamav-milter does not depend upon clamav-daemon (which contains
clamd). When and why would I want to
On Thu, Feb 16, 2006 at 11:47:00PM -0500, Steve Feehan said:
I see the --external option in the clamav-milter(8) man page, but the
explanation is confusing. I specify --external to tell clamav-milter
to pass off scanning the mail to clamd, but how do I specify the
LocalSocket (the man page
On 2/17/06, Nigel Horne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Feb 16, 2006 at 11:47:00PM -0500, Steve Feehan said:
I see the --external option in the clamav-milter(8) man page, but the
explanation is confusing. I specify --external to tell clamav-milter
to pass off scanning the mail to clamd,
Does anyone know if clam (running as clamd or clamxav) on mac os X will
catch the new virus that's apparently propagating via aim?
___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
I have reviewed the documentation and found some of the information that
I am looking for. But I need documentation on the exact process and the
steps that freshclam performs when it updates a pattern file. Something
link, freshclam checks and finds a new pattern file, the files is
On Feb 17, 2006, at 9:56 AM, Robert Setterlund wrote:
I have reviewed the documentation and found some of the information
that I am looking for. But I need documentation on the exact
process and the steps that freshclam performs when it updates a
pattern file. Something link, freshclam
On Fri, 17 Feb 2006 08:43:26 -0600
John Jolet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anyone know if clam (running as clamd or clamxav) on mac os X will
catch the new virus that's apparently propagating via aim?
ClamAV detects it since yesterday (Feb 16) as Trojan.Leap.A (sig
published by Diego) but the
Sites were hot at the time the messages were received, so either my concept
of how ClamAV blocks phishing is wrong or the detection method is not as
generic as I would have thought.
Generic fishing signature can be done... but... they are very difficult
to get right, without any false
On Fri, 17 Feb 2006 19:55:20 +0100
Oliver Stöneberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ClamAV still doesn't ctach all variants of a Parite.B
Please show me an active variant of Parite.B that is not detected by
ClamAV and at the same time is not a false positive detection of some
3rd party scanners.
ClamAV still doesn't ctach all variants of a Parite.B
Please show me an active variant of Parite.B that is not detected by
ClamAV and at the same time is not a false positive detection of some
3rd party scanners.
Then I will owe you a beer ;-)
Depends how you define active. I have
On Fri, 17 Feb 2006 20:15:09 +0100, you wrote:
On Fri, 17 Feb 2006 19:55:20 +0100
Oliver Stöneberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ClamAV still doesn't ctach all variants of a Parite.B
Please show me an active variant of Parite.B that is not detected by
ClamAV and at the same time is not a false
Oliver Stöneberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
That might be right, but the creator of the Phihsing signatures
(Sven) is pretty serious about what he is doing.
Thanks. :) The reason, because I create so much Phishing sigs is very
simple: I prefer this type of malware, but
12 matches
Mail list logo
