Re: [Clamav-users] clamstats script

2006-05-24 Thread Chris
On Wednesday 24 May 2006 7:05 pm, Rick Macdougall wrote: > Chris wrote: > > On Wednesday 24 May 2006 5:54 pm, Rick Macdougall wrote: > >> I developed this http://newmail.axess.com/virus/ > >> > >> But it's only currently for Qmail/simscan (until someone wants to > >> write a backend for another sca

Re: [Clamav-users] clamstats script

2006-05-24 Thread Rick Macdougall
Chris wrote: On Wednesday 24 May 2006 5:54 pm, Rick Macdougall wrote: I developed this http://newmail.axess.com/virus/ But it's only currently for Qmail/simscan (until someone wants to write a backend for another scanner). Kmail, however, its called via a plug-in for Spamassassin. I belie

Re: [Clamav-users] clamstats script

2006-05-24 Thread Chris
On Wednesday 24 May 2006 5:54 pm, Rick Macdougall wrote: > Chris wrote: > > I've downloaded a script that is supposed to output stats on virus's > > that clamav detects. Needless to say its not working correctly and I'm > > soliciting some help since I know nothing about perl. I'm sort of > > get

Re: [Clamav-users] clamstats script

2006-05-24 Thread Rick Macdougall
Chris wrote: I've downloaded a script that is supposed to output stats on virus's that clamav detects. Needless to say its not working correctly and I'm soliciting some help since I know nothing about perl. I'm sort of getting output however it doesn't show any virus's detected. I'd attach t

[Clamav-users] clamstats script

2006-05-24 Thread Chris
I've downloaded a script that is supposed to output stats on virus's that clamav detects. Needless to say its not working correctly and I'm soliciting some help since I know nothing about perl. I'm sort of getting output however it doesn't show any virus's detected. I'd attach the script but

[Clamav-users] OT: police state

2006-05-24 Thread Matthew.van.Eerde
Todd Lyons wrote: (signature quote) > We should not be building surveillance technology into standards. > Law enforcement was not supposed to be easy. Where it is easy, > it's called a police state. -- Jeff Schiller on NANOG He was probably paraphrasing the 1958 movie "Touch of

Re: [Clamav-users] Warning while update

2006-05-24 Thread Todd Lyons
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 11:33:31AM +0200, Egoitz Aurrekoetxea wrote: >I’m quite worried about that because in FAQ tells if it happens only >once to ignore it but when it happens often… what should I do? I use my >isp dns servers so no dns caching or s

Re: [Clamav-users] XF.Sic.L def is causing tons of false positives

2006-05-24 Thread Alex Georgopoulos
On 5/24/06, aCaB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Trog wrote: > I'd guess it unlikely that a legitimate spreadsheet would try and infect > a Workbook. > > -trog Sorry Trog, Didn't notice you had already replied. ___ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-use

Re: [Clamav-users] XF.Sic.L def is causing tons of false positives

2006-05-24 Thread aCaB
Trog wrote: > I'd guess it unlikely that a legitimate spreadsheet would try and infect > a Workbook. > > -trog Sorry Trog, Didn't notice you had already replied. ___ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html

Re: [Clamav-users] XF.Sic.L def is causing tons of false positives

2006-05-24 Thread aCaB
Alex Georgopoulos wrote: > First I would like to say I've submitted files via the web interface with > the false positive using the method from the FAQ. I have a bunch of excel > files that won't get through because clam thinks it has this W97 macro > virus. We have had 3 commercial AV vendors an

[Clamav-users] Warning while update

2006-05-24 Thread Egoitz Aurrekoetxea
Hi everybody, I’m having the next warning on freshclam.log file all updates I launch ARNING: Invalid DNS reply. Falling back to HTTP mode. main.cvd is up to date (version: 38, sigs: 51206, f-level: 7, builder: tkojm) daily.cvd is up to date (version: 1479, sigs: 5261, f-level: 8, builder

Re: [Clamav-users] XF.Sic.L def is causing tons of false positives

2006-05-24 Thread Trog
On Tue, 2006-05-23 at 11:36 -0600, Alex Georgopoulos wrote: > First I would like to say I've submitted files via the web interface with > the false positive using the method from the FAQ. I have a bunch of excel > files that won't get through because clam thinks it has this W97 macro > virus. We