Why ClamAV has significally small number of known viruses
in comparison to other AV software ?
Thanks,
Zvi
___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
On Tue, 2006-07-18 at 17:11 +0200, Zvi Kave wrote:
Why ClamAV has significally small number of known viruses
in comparison to other AV software ?
I don't think that's true. 62 thousand signatures is a healthy amount.
main.cvd is up to date (version: 39, sigs: 58116, f-level: 8, builder:
tkojm)
Daniel J McDonald wrote:
On Tue, 2006-07-18 at 17:11 +0200, Zvi Kave wrote:
Why ClamAV has significally small number of known viruses
in comparison to other AV software ?
I don't think that's true. 62 thousand signatures is a healthy amount.
main.cvd is up to date (version: 39, sigs: 58116,
Zvi Kave wrote:
Why ClamAV has significally small number of known viruses
in comparison to other AV software ?
There's only a small number of viruses in the wild. MS-DOS viruses from
10 years ago are not likely to pose a problem any longer. Having them in
your database only allows you to
Jim Maul wrote:
Not to mention that clamav was designed to be an email virus scanner.
TK may disagree with me on this, but I have the feeling that the
above statement is not true.
I believe (TK may correct me on this) that it would be better to say
that it has evolved into the state where is
On Tue, 18 Jul 2006 16:05:34 +0100
Nigel Horne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jim Maul wrote:
Not to mention that clamav was designed to be an email virus scanner.
TK may disagree with me on this, but I have the feeling that the
above statement is not true.
I believe (TK may correct me on
Greetings,
I am a new CLAMAV user. Is there any documentation anywhere that descibes
how to load new Virus definitions onto a system (and network) that is not
attached to the internet?
Thanks,
Kathy
___
Kathy Rossi wrote:
Greetings,
I am a new CLAMAV user. Is there any documentation anywhere that descibes
how to load new Virus definitions onto a system (and network) that is not
attached to the internet?
http://www.clamav.net/faq.html#pagestart
#26
-Jim
Tomasz Kojm wrote:
Well, it was initially designed as an addition to mail scanners such as
AMaViS and also a supplement to OpenAntiVirus which was lacking a command line
scanner.
Ah yes, I'd forgotten OpenAntiVirus and the connection there.
--
Nigel Horne. Arranger, Adjudicator, Band
On 7/18/06, Nigel Horne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
TK may disagree with me on this, but I have the feeling that the
above statement is not true.
I believe (TK may correct me on this) that it would be better to say
that it has evolved into the state where is it mostly
an email virus scanner. But
Rob MacGregor wrote:
On 7/18/06, Nigel Horne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
TK may disagree with me on this, but I have the feeling that the
above statement is not true.
I believe (TK may correct me on this) that it would be better to say
that it has evolved into the state where is it mostly
an
hello List,
since some weeks I get in my logfile the massage
WARNING: Your ClamAV installation is OUTDATED!
WARNING: Local version: 0.88.2 Recommended version: 0.88.3
I use debian Sarge and my apt-source are like the description on clamav.net
deb http://ftp2.de.debian.org/debian-volatile
brian wrote:
hello List,
since some weeks I get in my logfile the massage
WARNING: Your ClamAV installation is OUTDATED!
WARNING: Local version: 0.88.2 Recommended version: 0.88.3
I use debian Sarge and my apt-source are like the description on clamav.net
deb
On Tue, July 18, 2006 3:00 pm, brian said:
hello List,
since some weeks I get in my logfile the massage
WARNING: Your ClamAV installation is OUTDATED!
WARNING: Local version: 0.88.2 Recommended version: 0.88.3
I use debian Sarge and my apt-source are like the description on
clamav.net
On Tue, 2006-07-18 at 12:05 -0700, Dennis Peterson wrote:
brian wrote:
hello List,
since some weeks I get in my logfile the massage
WARNING: Your ClamAV installation is OUTDATED!
WARNING: Local version: 0.88.2 Recommended version: 0.88.3
I use debian Sarge and my apt-source
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of brian
Sent: 18 July 2006 20:01
To: clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
Subject: [Clamav-users] clamav update
hello List,
since some weeks I get in my logfile the massage
WARNING: Your ClamAV
I use debian Sarge and my apt-source are like the description
on clamav.net
deb http://ftp2.de.debian.org/debian-volatile sarge/volatile
main contrib non-free
but there are no updates .. whats wrong ??
thanx, Brian
http://lurker.clamav.net/message/20060712.141440.8eef57a6.en.html
On Tue, Jul 18, 2006 at 07:39:32AM -0700, Dennis Peterson wrote:
Zvi Kave wrote:
Why ClamAV has significally small number of known viruses
in comparison to other AV software ?
There's only a small number of viruses in the wild. MS-DOS viruses from
10 years ago are not likely to pose a
On Tue, 2006-07-18 at 07:39 -0700, Dennis Peterson wrote:
Zvi Kave wrote:
Why ClamAV has significally small number of known viruses
in comparison to other AV software ?
There's only a small number of viruses in the wild. MS-DOS viruses from
10 years ago are not likely to pose a problem
19 matches
Mail list logo
