William Knight wrote:
http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/clamav/clamav-0.90RC1.1.tar.gz?download
The only one shown at this time is Kent, UK.
Hi!
It's not limited to ClamAV, I'm getting the same thing for another program (Audacity)
...
It's proably simply some sort of problem with Source
my smtpd/clamd system seems to be working correctly...
no virus seen in a while, and logs of dropped viruses. :)
however, today I decided for no particular reason that I'd like
to see what my smtp rejections look like. So I tried to send
myself a virus... humph, can't get it to test positive. :-\
I'd like to download and use the clam-av software, but I became concerned
(and somewhat suspicious) when I saw only a single download mirror listed,
after visiting at the following url:
http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/clamav/clamav-0.90RC1.1.tar.gz?download
The only one shown at this time is
Christoph Cordes wrote:
Dennis Peterson wrote:
I already know the question is difficult, but it isn't impossible to
answer as there are other AV vendors who have a solution for this
particular problem if the article is to be believed.
So you want to know if the ClamAV Team monitors an infecte
* On 21/10/06 12:54 -0400, Christopher X. Candreva wrote:
|
| I have a sample of W97M.Lafool.U caught by 0.88.5 that 0.90rc1.1 says is
| clean. I also received an almost identical mail that both say is clean.
|
| The second I've submitted as a new virus sample. The first isn't taken,
| since
On Sat, 21 Oct 2006, Christopher X. Candreva wrote:
> I have a sample of W97M.Lafool.U caught by 0.88.5 that 0.90rc1.1 says is
> clean. I also received an almost identical mail that both say is clean.
Looks like this may be a word/unpacker problem on Solaris/Sparc, as it is
properly detected o
On Saturday 21 October 2006 10:24, Christian Rueger wrote:
> what your problem?
> it so easy
>
> postfix main.cf:
> smtpd_milters = unix:/clamav/milter
>
> postfix work in chroot /var/spool/postfix
>
> clamav-milter fake sendmail.mc:
> INPUT_MAIL_FILTER(‘clmilter’,‘S=unix:/var/spool/postfix/clamav
Bryan Bradsby wrote:
> Since clamAV does such a great job at catching phishing attacks, I was
> wondering if the sig-writers would want to help out this project by
> reporting any URLs they find in phishy email?
Users can also do this, by using the -r option of clamav-milter.
Huh? I can't find
Bryan Bradsby wrote:
> Since clamAV does such a great job at catching phishing attacks, I was
> wondering if the sig-writers would want to help out this project by
> reporting any URLs they find in phishy email?
Users can also do this, by using the -r option of clamav-milter.
Huh? I can't find
I have a sample of W97M.Lafool.U caught by 0.88.5 that 0.90rc1.1 says is
clean. I also received an almost identical mail that both say is clean.
The second I've submitted as a new virus sample. The first isn't taken,
since the web form's 0.88.5 catches it.
I assumed I had missed a config opt
> Since clamAV does such a great job at catching phishing attacks, I was
> wondering if the sig-writers would want to help out this project by
> reporting any URLs they find in phishy email?
Users can also do this, by using the -r option of clamav-milter.
Huh? I can't find the -r option in clam
Am Samstag, den 21.10.2006, 08:33 -0400 schrieb Gerard Seibert:
> FreeBSD 6.1 STABLE
> ClamAV 0.88.5
> clamav-milter 0.88.5
> Postfix-2.4-20061006
>
>
> I previously had clamav-milter working on a PC with 'Sendmail' as the
> MTA. My new system has 'Postfix' installed. I have no desire to change
>
FreeBSD 6.1 STABLE
ClamAV 0.88.5
clamav-milter 0.88.5
Postfix-2.4-20061006
I previously had clamav-milter working on a PC with 'Sendmail' as the
MTA. My new system has 'Postfix' installed. I have no desire to change
this, therefore I would like to know how to get the clamav-milter to
operate with
Jason Haar wrote:
Since clamAV does such a great job at catching phishing attacks, I was
wondering if the sig-writers would want to help out this project by
reporting any URLs they find in phishy email?
Users can also do this, by using the -r option of clamav-milter.
-Nigel
___
Will Kramer wrote:
It seems to me that it takes Clam a long time to scan
my hard drive 7:45 hours to scan 19 GB compared to
Norton which takes less than two hours I think. I used
the Cygwin package and ran clamscan -i -r ...
Perhaps it's slower because ClamAV scans for more than Norton.
___
15 matches
Mail list logo
