On 3/16/07, Dana Kashubeck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/15/07 7:04 PM, John Rudd wrote:
Dana Kashubeck wrote:
I am not able to compile the latest stable version on Mac OS X Server
10.3. There are a few different warnings here and there, most of them
are shown while compiling unrar.c:
...
Hi
I have upgraded my 0.88.7 installations (round about 120 servers)
to the new 0.90.1. A proofscript tests always one time per day,
if main.cvd exists.
So on 40 servers the main.cvd does not exist. For that the file
is in main.inc/main.db.
But I don't understand why some servers have the old
On 3/16/07, Jens Strohschnitter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
I have upgraded my 0.88.7 installations (round about 120 servers)
to the new 0.90.1. A proofscript tests always one time per day,
if main.cvd exists.
So on 40 servers the main.cvd does not exist. For that the file
is in
I have upgraded my 0.88.7 installations (round about 120 servers)
to the new 0.90.1. A proofscript tests always one time per day,
if main.cvd exists.
So on 40 servers the main.cvd does not exist. For that the file
is in main.inc/main.db.
After a main.cvd update, if you have
Tomasz Kojm wrote:
On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 17:29:32 -0500
Alex Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 09:54:38 -0700
Dennis Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My personal opinion is that clamd is self-refreshing the databases at
the instant a new database is being installed. If
Hi,
during debuging the performance/HIGH-CPU-problem in Solaris10, I found severeal
times this:
LibClamAV debug: Signature offset: 10620, expected: 0
(Trojan.Downloader.Bat.Ftp.gen-6)
LibClamAV debug: Signature offset: 10620, expected: 0
(Trojan.Downloader.Bat.Ftp.gen-5)
LibClamAV debug:
Hello Jens,
Editing scripts to proof both paths is very difficult, because there are 5
different versions on all 120 servers. So there is a lot to do to edit
the scripts.
Is there no other way, to activate main.cvd or main.inc on all servers ?
no,
Best regards
--
Luca Gibelli (luca _at_
Hello clamav-users,
I tried to install new clamav on my freebsd-4.8. ./configure with
enable-experimental was good. but make ends with error code 1.
Clamav-0.90.1 is not installable on freebsd-4.8,yes?
Help please.
Thanks.
--
Best regards,
Sergio Bortsov(Global Ukraine Lan ISP),
On Friday March 16, 2007 at 07:02:33 (AM) sergio wrote:
I tried to install new clamav on my freebsd-4.8. ./configure with
enable-experimental was good. but make ends with error code 1.
Clamav-0.90.1 is not installable on freebsd-4.8,yes?
Help please.
Versions of FreeBSD = 5.5 are not
Hello clamav-users,
I tried to install new clamav on my freebsd-4.8. ./configure with
enable-experimental was good. but make ends with error code 1.
Clamav-0.90.1 is not installable on freebsd-4.8,yes?
Help please.
Thanks.
--
Best regards,
Sergio Bortsov(Global Ukraine Lan ISP),
sergio wrote:
Hello clamav-users,
I tried to install new clamav on my freebsd-4.8. ./configure with
enable-experimental was good. but make ends with error code 1.
Clamav-0.90.1 is not installable on freebsd-4.8,yes?
Help please.
Thanks.
My compile farm only has 4.11, but clamAV
sergio schrieb:
Hello clamav-users,
I tried to install new clamav on my freebsd-4.8. ./configure with
enable-experimental was good. but make ends with error code 1.
Clamav-0.90.1 is not installable on freebsd-4.8,yes?
Help please.
Thanks.
I have Clamav-0.90.1 running and
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 11:38:16 +0100
Luca Gibelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Jens,
Editing scripts to proof both paths is very difficult, because there are 5
different versions on all 120 servers. So there is a lot to do to edit
the scripts.
Is there no other way, to activate
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 12:59:35 +0100
Jens Strohschnitter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
so I don't know about, how one server has main.cvd and the other one has
main.inc. :-(((
Edwin has already described that in this thread.
--
oo. Tomasz Kojm [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(\/)\.
Hello Matthias,
Friday, March 16, 2007, 1:40:44 PM, you wrote:
sergio schrieb:
Hello clamav-users,
I tried to install new clamav on my freebsd-4.8. ./configure with
enable-experimental was good. but make ends with error code 1.
Clamav-0.90.1 is not installable on freebsd-4.8,yes?
Gerard Seibert wrote:
On Friday March 16, 2007 at 07:02:33 (AM) sergio wrote:
I tried to install new clamav on my freebsd-4.8. ./configure with
enable-experimental was good. but make ends with error code 1.
Clamav-0.90.1 is not installable on freebsd-4.8,yes?
Help please.
Versions of
Hi, Clamav-Users,
some minutes ago I've installed the binary version
clamav-0.90.1.sol10-x86.tar.gz
on a x86-machine running under solaris 10.
If I start clamscan or freshclam I get the error message
ld.so.1: clamscan: fatal: relocation error: file
/usr/local/lib/libclamav.so.2: symbol
I set up ClamAV and clamav-milter for the first time a few months ago.
I used 0.90rc2 at the time. I have been meaning to update it for a
while but didn't get around to it until yesterday. I tried 0.90.1, but
it ate up the CPU and logged errors. For comparison, I also checked
0.90 and 0.90rc3
From: jean-paul natola [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: ClamAV users ML clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
To: clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] 90 disasters- revert to .88
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 17:38:32 -0400
From: Török Edvin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: ClamAV users ML
Hello,
Yesterday I ugraded clamav to 90.1. All went fine and the software worked
well but today in the morning clamd retreived new signatures and:
Mar 16 11:34:10 192 freshclam[36963]: Database updated (99431 signatures)
from db.pl.clamav.net (IP: 212.14.28.36)
followed by:
Mar 16 11:36:00
On Friday 16 March 2007 06:26 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gerard Seibert wrote:
On Friday March 16, 2007 at 07:02:33 (AM) sergio wrote:
I tried to install new clamav on my freebsd-4.8. ./configure with
enable-experimental was good. but make ends with error code 1.
Clamav-0.90.1 is
Are the System Requirements for Clam AntiVirus listed anywhere? It
seems to me that this would have helped several people who have had
issues with 0.90. I couldn't find anything, but maybe I missed it.
--
-
Dana Kashubeck
Systems Manager
Riemer Reporting
Dana Kashubeck wrote:
Are the System Requirements for Clam AntiVirus listed anywhere? It
seems to me that this would have helped several people who have had
issues with 0.90. I couldn't find anything, but maybe I missed it.
There's a start here:
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 16:39:23 +0100
Zbigniew Szalbot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
Yesterday I ugraded clamav to 90.1. All went fine and the software worked
well but today in the morning clamd retreived new signatures and:
Mar 16 11:34:10 192 freshclam[36963]: Database updated (99431
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Sergio,
do you have libgmp on your system ?
If yes, do the following:
setenv CFLAGS -O2 -I/usr/local/include
setenv LDFLAGS -s -L/usr/local/lib
./configure ...
The -L/usr/local/lib is to make sure, if libgmp is in /usr/local/lib,
it will be
On 16 Mar 2007, at 15:39, Zbigniew Szalbot wrote:
Hello,
Yesterday I ugraded clamav to 90.1. All went fine and the software
worked
well but today in the morning clamd retreived new signatures and:
Mar 16 11:34:10 192 freshclam[36963]: Database updated (99431
signatures)
from
Hello,
Any thoughts would be greatly appreciated as it was several hours
before I spotted this and manually restarted clamd. Oddly, mail was still
being delivered, but without any virus checks ??
Ok, this is what I meant - clamd was not working. I had to manually
restart it. However, I must
Zbigniew Szalbot wrote:
Hello,
Any thoughts would be greatly appreciated as it was several hours
before I spotted this and manually restarted clamd. Oddly, mail was still
being delivered, but without any virus checks ??
Ok, this is what I meant - clamd was not working. I had to manually
Hello,
Do you mean it rejects it or tempfails it? A tempfail is a legitimate
condition when your processes are in a failed state. So too is reject, but
certainly more drastic and likely to create political repercussions. Worst
is to silently drop messages.
It tempfails them, which is fine
On 16 Mar 2007, at 17:20, Zbigniew Szalbot wrote:
Hello,
Do you mean it rejects it or tempfails it? A tempfail is a legitimate
condition when your processes are in a failed state. So too is
reject, but
certainly more drastic and likely to create political
repercussions. Worst
is to
What does the -e or --external do?
Thanks,
Ken
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007, Andreas [iso-8859-1] M?rdter wrote:
On Friday 16 March 2007 00:11, John Fleming wrote:
- And the clamav log is free of errors and indicated that the database
is updated appropriately and clamd is being notified of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 07:11:20PM -0400, John Fleming wrote:
- And the clamav log is free of errors and indicated that the database is
updated appropriately and clamd is being notified of changes.
OK, clamav is finding viruses again, but they are
On 3/16/07, Robert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 16 Mar 2007, at 17:20, Zbigniew Szalbot wrote:
Hello,
Do you mean it rejects it or tempfails it? A tempfail is a legitimate
condition when your processes are in a failed state. So too is
reject, but
certainly more drastic and likely to
On 16 Mar 2007, at 19:16, Török Edvin wrote:
On 3/16/07, Robert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 16 Mar 2007, at 17:20, Zbigniew Szalbot wrote:
Hello,
Do you mean it rejects it or tempfails it? A tempfail is a
legitimate
condition when your processes are in a failed state. So too is
- Original Message -
From: Todd Lyons [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
Sent: Friday, March 16, 2007 3:07 PM
Subject: Re: ClamAV not LOGGING viruses was [Clamav-users] 0.90.1 not
findingviruses
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Mar 15, 2007
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 19:45:10 -0400
John Fleming [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
X-Virus-Status: Yes
X-Virus-Report: Eicar-Test-Signature FOUND
X-Virus-Checker-Version: clamassassin 1.2.4 with clamscan / ClamAV
--
oo.
- Original Message -
From: Tomasz Kojm [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
Sent: Friday, March 16, 2007 7:49 PM
Subject: Re: ClamAV not LOGGING viruses was [Clamav-users] 0.90.1
notfindingviruses
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 19:45:10 -0400
John Fleming [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tomasz Kojm wrote:
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 19:45:10 -0400
John Fleming [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
X-Virus-Status: Yes
X-Virus-Report: Eicar-Test-Signature FOUND
X-Virus-Checker-Version: clamassassin 1.2.4 with clamscan / ClamAV
That
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 08:03:14PM -0400, John Fleming said:
That's not different though, from when it was logging the viruses to
clamav.log.
If you look at clamassassin, it does call clamscan, but again, it USED to
log virus names to clamav.log.
I have this idea that something in that
John Fleming wrote:
- Original Message - From: Tomasz Kojm [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
Sent: Friday, March 16, 2007 7:49 PM
Subject: Re: ClamAV not LOGGING viruses was [Clamav-users] 0.90.1
notfindingviruses
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 19:45:10 -0400
John Fleming
- Original Message -
From: Dennis Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ClamAV users ML clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
Sent: Friday, March 16, 2007 8:04 PM
Subject: Re: ClamAV not LOGGING viruses was [Clamav-users] 0.90.1not
findingviruses
Tomasz Kojm wrote:
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 19:45:10
- Original Message -
From: Stephen Gran [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
Sent: Friday, March 16, 2007 8:12 PM
Subject: Re: ClamAV not LOGGING viruses was [Clamav-users]
0.90.1notfindingviruses
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 08:03:14PM -0400, John Fleming said:
That's
42 matches
Mail list logo
