On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 02:27:08PM -0700, Peter Hadikin said:
> Had anybody succeeded in getting 0.91.2 to compile on AIX 5.3. I get an
> When I run 'make' I get the following message:
>
> ld: 0711-317 ERROR: Undefined symbol: .iconv_close
> ld: 0711-317 ERROR: Undefined symbol: .iconv_open
> ld:
Had anybody succeeded in getting 0.91.2 to compile on AIX 5.3. I get an
When I run 'make' I get the following message:
gcc -shared -o .libs/libclamav.so.2 .libs/matcher-ac.o
.libs/matcher-bm.o.libs/matcher-
ncore.o .libs/matcher.o .libs/md5.o .libs/others.o .libs/readdb.o
.libs/cvd.o .libs/dsig.
John Rudd schrieb:
> My statement to not upgrade isn't mainly on the point of safety. My
> statement is because the clamav team have known about this problem for a
> while, and continue to do nothing about it. I'm saying "don't upgrade
> until they fix this easy to fix, but very troublesome, i
On Tue, 21 Aug 2007, John Rudd wrote:
> - the problem would be trivial for them to fix, it's just a one line
> change in clamav.h ... all that has to be done is a simple change to
> include CL_SCAN_PHISHING_DOMAINLIST in the definition of CL_SCAN_STDOPT
Why don't you write a patch to fix the p
On Tue, 21 Aug 2007 04:53:28 -0700
John Rudd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It has a dangerous (lack of) value for CL_SCAN_STDOPT. You're better
> off not upgrading until they fix it.
>
> (filed as bug 631, but it's nothing new: CL_SCAN_STDOPT still doesn't
> include CL_SCAN_PHISHING_DOMAINLIST;
Tilman Schmidt wrote:
> John Rudd schrieb:
>> (filed as bug 631, but it's nothing new: CL_SCAN_STDOPT still doesn't
>> include CL_SCAN_PHISHING_DOMAINLIST; that omission can cause crashing
>> and hanging on certain platforms ... the clamav team already knows about
>> this problem, and they even
John Rudd wrote:
> It has a dangerous (lack of) value for CL_SCAN_STDOPT. You're better
> off not upgrading until they fix it.
Is this a pet peeve, ravings of crack addled pomeranian, or real problem
most of us will experience? Under what conditions would we expect
dangerous failures? How will
John Rudd schrieb:
> (filed as bug 631, but it's nothing new: CL_SCAN_STDOPT still doesn't
> include CL_SCAN_PHISHING_DOMAINLIST; that omission can cause crashing
> and hanging on certain platforms ... the clamav team already knows about
> this problem, and they even enable that option as a defa
On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 04:53:28AM -0700, John Rudd said:
>
> It has a dangerous (lack of) value for CL_SCAN_STDOPT. You're better
> off not upgrading until they fix it.
>
> (filed as bug 631, but it's nothing new: CL_SCAN_STDOPT still doesn't
> include CL_SCAN_PHISHING_DOMAINLIST; that omissi
On Tue, 21 Aug 2007 04:53:28 -0700, John Rudd wrote
> It has a dangerous (lack of) value for CL_SCAN_STDOPT. You're better
> off not upgrading until they fix it.
>
> (filed as bug 631, but it's nothing new: CL_SCAN_STDOPT still doesn't
> include CL_SCAN_PHISHING_DOMAINLIST; that omission can ca
John Rudd schrieb:
> It has a dangerous (lack of) value for CL_SCAN_STDOPT. You're better
> off not upgrading until they fix it.
>
> (filed as bug 631, but it's nothing new: CL_SCAN_STDOPT still doesn't
> include CL_SCAN_PHISHING_DOMAINLIST; that omission can cause crashing
> and hanging on ce
On Tue, 21 Aug 2007, John Rudd wrote:
> (filed as bug 631, but it's nothing new: CL_SCAN_STDOPT still doesn't
> include CL_SCAN_PHISHING_DOMAINLIST; that omission can cause crashing
The bug is protected so I can't look at it. However, is it enough to add
CL_SCAN_PHISHING_DOMAINLISt to the defi
It has a dangerous (lack of) value for CL_SCAN_STDOPT. You're better
off not upgrading until they fix it.
(filed as bug 631, but it's nothing new: CL_SCAN_STDOPT still doesn't
include CL_SCAN_PHISHING_DOMAINLIST; that omission can cause crashing
and hanging on certain platforms ... the clamav
13 matches
Mail list logo
