[Clamav-users] Sourcefire's acquisition of ClamAV -- Will ClamAV become close source ?

2007-08-27 Thread Sergei Lavrov
Does this mean ClamAV will become close source sometime in the future ? Lavrov Boardwalk for $500? In 2007? Ha! Play Monopoly Here and Now (it's updated for today's economy) at Yahoo! Games.

Re: [Clamav-users] Sourcefire's acquisition of ClamAV -- Will ClamAV become close source ?

2007-08-27 Thread James Kosin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Sergei Lavrov wrote: Does this mean ClamAV will become close source sometime in the future ? Lavrov Boardwalk for $500? In 2007? Ha! Play Monopoly

Re: [Clamav-users] Sourcefire's acquisition of ClamAV -- Will ClamAV become close source ?

2007-08-27 Thread Freddie Cash
On August 27, 2007 06:30 am Sergei Lavrov wrote: Does this mean ClamAV will become close source sometime in the future ? Read through the mailing list archives for this month, there's a super-long thread on this subject in there. -- Freddie Cash, LPIC-2 CCNT CCLP Network Support

[Clamav-users] Question About Version 0.91.2

2007-08-27 Thread Kaplan, Andrew H.
Hi there - I am prepared to upgrade our servers to version 0.91.2 of ClamAV, but I read several e-mails that mentioned operational problems with that version. Have these issues been resolved, or should I wait for the next version that is released later this year? Thanks. The information

Re: [Clamav-users] Question About Version 0.91.2

2007-08-27 Thread Noel Jones
At 12:49 PM 8/27/2007, Kaplan, Andrew H. wrote: I am prepared to upgrade our servers to version 0.91.2 of ClamAV, but I read several e-mails that mentioned operational problems with that version. Have these issues been resolved, or should I wait for the next version that is released later this

Re: [Clamav-users] Question About Version 0.91.2

2007-08-27 Thread John W. Baxter
On 8/27/07 10:49 AM, Kaplan, Andrew H. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am prepared to upgrade our servers to version 0.91.2 of ClamAV, but I read several e-mails that mentioned operational problems with that version. Have these issues been resolved, or should I wait for the next version that

Re: [Clamav-users] Possible problem with Phishing.Heuristics.Email.SpoofedDomain daily sigs 4054

2007-08-27 Thread John W. Baxter
On 8/24/07 2:12 PM, John W. Baxter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Daily sigs: 4054; main 44. ClamAv 0.91.2-1 Installed on CentOS-4.5 from Dag's packages. Freshly updated via the packages from the ancient 0.90-2 (also Dag's). (of course For the moment, I'm turning what should be the quite

[Clamav-users] ClamAV is acquired for about USD 2.4 million

2007-08-27 Thread Sergei Lavrov
http://www.reuters.com/article/marketsNews/idUKWNAS229720070817?rpc=44 The company said it expects a one-time charge of 9 cents to 12 cents a share for the immediate write-off of in-process research and development in the third quarter. (Reporting by Manish Gupta in Bangalore)

[Clamav-users] As soon as Sourcefire starts charging for virus updates,

2007-08-27 Thread Sergei Lavrov
people will stop contributing signatures, right ? - Building a website is a piece of cake. Yahoo! Small Business gives you all the tools to get online. ___ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit

Re: [Clamav-users] Possible problem with Phishing.Heuristics.Email.SpoofedDomain daily sigs 4054

2007-08-27 Thread Noel Jones
At 02:49 PM 8/27/2007, John W. Baxter wrote: We're seeing 1. Mail from Yahoo groups (or some mail from Yahoo groups) being marked as Phishing (for URL reasons) 2. Same for a Seattle Times mailing list. 3. Same for a Democracy in Action mailing. 4. Customer (unwise, usually)

Re: [Clamav-users] Question About Version 0.91.2

2007-08-27 Thread Tilman Schmidt
Am 27.08.2007 19:49 schrieb Kaplan, Andrew H.: I am prepared to upgrade our servers to version 0.91.2 of ClamAV, but I read several e-mails that mentioned operational problems with that version. Have these issues been resolved, or should I wait for the next version that is released later

Re: [Clamav-users] Possible problem with Phishing.Heuristics.Email.SpoofedDomain daily sigs 4054

2007-08-27 Thread Noel Jones
At 03:26 PM 8/27/2007, some careless fool wrote: Unfortunately, clamd doesn't seem to log (all) options on startup, so the log isn't terribly useful this time. Correction, clamd does log when PhishingScanURLs is disabled. So you should check what clamd logs on startup. # grep phishing

Re: [Clamav-users] As soon as Sourcefire starts charging for virus updates,

2007-08-27 Thread John Rudd
Sergei Lavrov wrote: people will stop contributing signatures, right ? Or they'll start contributing more to the 3rd party signature databases, instead (MSRBL, MBL, SaneSecurity, etc.). If the engine is free, but the signatures aren't, you don't need to go to Sourcefire for your

Re: [Clamav-users] Possible problem with Phishing.Heuristics.Email.SpoofedDomain daily sigs 4054

2007-08-27 Thread John W. Baxter
Problem seems not to be a ClamAV problem, but ours. Sorry for the noise. On 8/24/07 2:12 PM, John W. Baxter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Daily sigs: 4054; main 44. ClamAv 0.91.2-1 Installed on CentOS-4.5 from Dag's packages. Freshly updated via the packages from the ancient 0.90-2 (also

Re: [Clamav-users] Possible problem with Phishing.Heuristics.Email.SpoofedDomain daily sigs 4054

2007-08-27 Thread Noel Jones
-Original Message- From: John W. Baxter [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: ClamAV users ML clamav-users@lists.clamav.net Sent: 8/27/07 4:59 PM Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] Possible problem with Phishing.Heuristics.EmailSpoofedDomain daily sigs 4054 Problem seems not to be a ClamAV problem, but ours.