http://tinyurl.com/23stze
Email is not a requirement - it's being outsourced.
dp
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
John Rudd wrote:
> Dennis Peterson wrote:
>> Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2007-09-12 at 07:28 -0700, John Rudd wrote:
(to the developers, not in answer to Burnie)
See, the current name scheme needs to be fixed. And no one responded at
all to my proposed scheme from a
Andy Fiddaman wrote:
> It's not just core Clam signatures either, SaneSecurity recently changed
> the capitalisation on some of their sigs which caused me a few issues (I'm
> checking case-insensitively now!
Sorry about that... bit of finger trouble on a output script... normal
service should no
Kelson wrote:
> John Rudd wrote:
>> But, without a coherent and explicit name convention, the rules for
>> doing so would be so complex as to be not be worth the effort in writing
>> them. In some cases, it's even ambiguous as to which of the above
>> categories a given message falls in to.
>
John Rudd wrote:
> But, without a coherent and explicit name convention, the rules for
> doing so would be so complex as to be not be worth the effort in writing
> them. In some cases, it's even ambiguous as to which of the above
> categories a given message falls in to.
Or, alternatively, a p
Dennis Peterson wrote:
> Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
>> On Wed, 2007-09-12 at 07:28 -0700, John Rudd wrote:
>>> (to the developers, not in answer to Burnie)
>>>
>>> See, the current name scheme needs to be fixed. And no one responded at
>>> all to my proposed scheme from a month or two ago.
>> Coi
Andy Fiddaman wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Sep 2007, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
>
> ; On Wed, 2007-09-12 at 07:28 -0700, John Rudd wrote:
> ; > (to the developers, not in answer to Burnie)
> ; >
> ; > See, the current name scheme needs to be fixed. And no one responded at
> ; > all to my proposed scheme f
On Wed, 12 Sep 2007, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
; On Wed, 2007-09-12 at 07:28 -0700, John Rudd wrote:
; > (to the developers, not in answer to Burnie)
; >
; > See, the current name scheme needs to be fixed. And no one responded at
; > all to my proposed scheme from a month or two ago.
;
; Coinci
Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-09-12 at 07:28 -0700, John Rudd wrote:
>> (to the developers, not in answer to Burnie)
>>
>> See, the current name scheme needs to be fixed. And no one responded at
>> all to my proposed scheme from a month or two ago.
>
> Coincidentally, my very first q
On Wed, 2007-09-12 at 07:28 -0700, John Rudd wrote:
> (to the developers, not in answer to Burnie)
>
> See, the current name scheme needs to be fixed. And no one responded at
> all to my proposed scheme from a month or two ago.
Coincidentally, my very first question on this list years ago was a
On Wed, 12 Sep 2007 10:57:33 -0400, Paul Griffith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> Does any one have any suggestions for handling spam surges? We had a spam
> mail surge and exim was getting connection timeout errors from the clamd
> socket, for spamassassin we can increase the number
Użytkownik Paul Griffith napisał:
> Greetings,
>
> Does any one have any suggestions for handling spam surges? We had a spam
> mail surge and exim was getting connection timeout errors from the clamd
> socket, for spamassassin we can increase the number of child processes to
> handle more co
Paul Griffith wrote:
> Does any one have any suggestions for handling spam surges? We had a spam
> mail surge and exim was getting connection timeout errors from the clamd
> socket, for spamassassin we can increase the number of child processes to
> handle more connections.
With postfix, I l
Paul Griffith wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> Does any one have any suggestions for handling spam surges? We had a spam
> mail surge and exim was getting connection timeout errors from the clamd
> socket, for spamassassin we can increase the number of child processes to
> handle more connections.
>
Greetings,
Does any one have any suggestions for handling spam surges? We had a spam
mail surge and exim was getting connection timeout errors from the clamd
socket, for spamassassin we can increase the number of child processes to
handle more connections.
Any best of practices out there ?
On 9/12/07, John Rudd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> (to the developers, not in answer to Burnie)
>
> See, the current name scheme needs to be fixed. And no one responded at
> all to my proposed scheme from a month or two ago.
+1
--
/peter
___
Help us
I just installed ClamAV-0.91.2 on a Redhat EL 4 server for testing. There were
no errors during the install.
I then edited the clamd and freshclam configuration files because our system is
behind a firewall and I have to use a proxy server.
When I run freshclam I get these error messages -
(to the developers, not in answer to Burnie)
See, the current name scheme needs to be fixed. And no one responded at
all to my proposed scheme from a month or two ago.
Burnie wrote:
> Just a bit curious - what "classification" is this signature?
> I can't find this naming scheme mentioned som
Just a bit curious - what "classification" is this signature?
I can't find this naming scheme mentioned somewhere.
ClamAV database updated (11 Sep 2007 19-32 +): daily.cvd
Version: 4244
Submission-ID: 1710033
Sender: rafael
Added: Email.Foolball-2
Hi there,
On Wed, 12 Sep 2007 Dennis Peterson wrote:
> ... today I got my first FP using that file so deleted it. I've
> never gotten a FP using the VX db, but then I've never gotten a hit
> with it either. Meanwhile, Sane Security keeps knocking them down.
Just wondering - are ClamAV databases
20 matches
Mail list logo
