Re: [Clamav-users] clamd stuck at 100% cpu usage

2007-10-26 Thread Matt
- Jeff Thurston [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Im running clamav 91.2 (90.3 did the same thing). After about an hour or so the clamd process gets stuck at 100%. I've checked various logs for the cause and haven't found anything. Clamav is being run by amavis-new 2.3 if that info is of any

Re: [Clamav-users] Vote for ClamAV as the best anti-malware solut ion

2007-10-26 Thread Bowie Bailey
I found a privacy policy here: http://www.scmagazineus.com/PrivacyPolicy/ but I can't quite figure out what it is trying to say. Bowie -Original Message- From: Michael Brown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2007 1:55 PM To: ClamAV users ML Subject: Re:

Re: [Clamav-users] ClamAV patch download not working in South Africa

2007-10-26 Thread Luca Gibelli
Hello Andrea, Could you confirm whether the local server db.za.clamav.net had a problem yesterday ? Is that problem solved now ? are you running a version of freshclam 0.91 ? Best regards -- Luca Gibelli (luca _at_ clamav.net) ClamAV, a GPL anti-virus toolkit [Tel] +39 06 916502176

Re: [Clamav-users] Vote for ClamAV as the best anti-malware solut ion

2007-10-26 Thread Dennis Peterson
Bowie Bailey wrote: I found a privacy policy here: http://www.scmagazineus.com/PrivacyPolicy/ but I can't quite figure out what it is trying to say. Bowie It says clearly they will provide, possibly for a fee, possibly not, all your information to their contacts list. In addition, if

Re: [Clamav-users] Vote for ClamAV as the best anti-malware solut ion

2007-10-26 Thread Dave Warren
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dennis Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Question: Why is this called a privacy statement rather than an invasion of privacy statement? Just because their statement is you have no privacy doesn't change that fact that it's a privacy statement. At least they're

Re: [Clamav-users] Vote for ClamAV as the best anti-malware solut ion

2007-10-26 Thread Dennis Peterson
Dave Warren wrote: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dennis Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Question: Why is this called a privacy statement rather than an invasion of privacy statement? Just because their statement is you have no privacy doesn't change that fact that it's a privacy