Hello,
I run a dual boot fedora 9 and windows XP. After having worked with windows
apps, I usually run a clamscan from my linux environment. The last time I did
that I found these lines in the log :
/media/windows/Documents and Settings/Pascal
Duchatelle/Bureau/Lavasoft_Adaware2007_fr.exe:
Spiro Harvey, Knossos Networks Ltd wrote:
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at tad.clamav.net
just found this in the headers of this mailing list :(
So the message was scanned for viruses. So what?
--
Bowie
___
Help us build a comprehensive
Spiro Harvey, Knossos Networks Ltd wrote:
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at tad.clamav.net
just found this in the headers of this mailing list :(
Don't be surprised. I often use products I create in my spare time. If
you aren't willing to use the product you are creating yourself
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 3:22 PM, James Kosin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Spiro Harvey, Knossos Networks Ltd wrote:
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at tad.clamav.net
just found this in the headers of this mailing list :(
Don't be surprised. I often use products I create in my spare
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 04:20:21PM +0200, shuttlebox wrote:
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at tad.clamav.net
just found this in the headers of this mailing list :(
honestly expect others to. This just means they are using clamav on their
Upload the exe to http://www.clamav.net/sendvirus if you think it is a FP.
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 5:33 AM, Pascal Duchatelle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hello,
I run a dual boot fedora 9 and windows XP. After having worked with windows
apps, I usually run a clamscan from my linux environment.
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 04:20:21PM +0200, shuttlebox said:
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 3:22 PM, James Kosin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Spiro Harvey, Knossos Networks Ltd wrote:
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at tad.clamav.net
just found this in the headers of this mailing list :(
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 4:49 PM, Stephen Gran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a point to this thread?
Not really, it started out weird and we just went from there. :-)
/peter
--
Emo Philips - I got some new underwear the other day. Well, new to me.
Thanks in advance for any and all help. 0.93.3 on CentOS 5.2 64bit seems
to have a memory doubling issue whenever the database is reloaded.
On starting clamd, the ram usage is 70MB. But whenever it reloads the
database automatically:
Fri Jul 11 09:25:02 2008 - No stats for Database check -
Le Fri, 11 Jul 2008 09:29:05 -0500,
Brandon Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
Upload the exe to http://www.clamav.net/sendvirus if you think it is a FP.
I just tried but it is 20 MB and the upper limit is set to about 3 MB. Is there
a way to upload it anyway ?
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 5:33
On Jul 11, 2008, at 7:20 AM, shuttlebox wrote:
[ ... ]
The header just says it was scanned by Amavis, not that Amavis used
ClamAV.
For what it's worth, this can easily be changed if you add the
following:
$X_HEADER_LINE = $myproduct_name+ClamAV at $mydomain;
...to your amavisd.conf.
Hi All
Ive got a general best practices question i'm hoping ppl can give me
advice on
I'm running clamav 0.93 on redhat es4
so, everythings working great. I update my virus db once a day and
twice now run into the problem of the db file being outdated and
tagging everything
as
On Fri, 11 Jul 2008 09:48:01 -0500
Russell Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks in advance for any and all help. 0.93.3 on CentOS 5.2 64bit seems
to have a memory doubling issue whenever the database is reloaded.
On starting clamd, the ram usage is 70MB. But whenever it reloads the
On 2008-07-11 19:38, Julie S. Lin wrote:
Hi All
Ive got a general best practices question i'm hoping ppl can give me
advice on
I'm running clamav 0.93 on redhat es4
so, everythings working great. I update my virus db once a day and
twice now run into the problem of the db file being
Tomasz Kojm wrote:
On Fri, 11 Jul 2008 09:48:01 -0500
Russell Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
.. the memory usage jumps to 131 megs and stays there. What is causing
this, and how can I fix it?
Please have a look at
https://wwws.clamav.net/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1028
Is this not a
On Fri, 11 Jul 2008 09:38:08 -0700
Julie S. Lin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
so, everythings working great. I update my virus db once a day and
twice now run into the problem of the db file being outdated and
tagging everything
as infected. what can I do to ensure I have the least virus db
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 09:52:43AM -0700, Dennis Peterson said:
Tomasz Kojm wrote:
On Fri, 11 Jul 2008 09:48:01 -0500
Russell Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
.. the memory usage jumps to 131 megs and stays there. What is causing
this, and how can I fix it?
Please have a look
what happens if I get a too recent virus file, the engine doens't
recognize it and dumps everything
into infected. you say this should not happen but it did to me. here's
my logs ... I had to upgrade
engine before it worked again. can anyone shed some insight? thanks
ClamAV update process
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 6:52 PM, Dennis Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is this not a problem with Sparc processors, then? I've not witnessed it
at all on my systems.
Me neither, I have clamd running on several Solaris 10 servers for
months staying at 70 MB. When I heard of excessive memory
Sorry for the silly question, however with that patch, do I just replace
the original thrmgr.c file with this one, then recompile/reinstall? I
just want to make sure I do it correctly.
Thanks!
shuttlebox wrote:
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 6:52 PM, Dennis Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is
Russell Jones wrote:
Sorry for the silly question, however with that patch, do I just replace
the original thrmgr.c file with this one, then recompile/reinstall? I
just want to make sure I do it correctly.
Thanks!
No, a patch is more of a difference between two files. You won't be
able to
Stephen Gran wrote:
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 09:52:43AM -0700, Dennis Peterson said:
Tomasz Kojm wrote:
On Fri, 11 Jul 2008 09:48:01 -0500
Russell Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
.. the memory usage jumps to 131 megs and stays there. What is causing
this, and how can I fix it?
Please have a
Yay! I am happy to report that the patch has fixed the database
reloading / memory doubling problem beautifully:
Fri Jul 11 15:41:30 2008 - Thread cleaning up. thr_alive(0)Fri Jul 11
15:42:01 2008 - No stats for Database check - forcing reload
Fri Jul 11 15:42:01 2008 - Active threads(1).
At 02:18 09-07-2008, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
Please have a look at the comment #12 on the bug page
If you encourage people to build from ports, it's more difficult to
get feedback from those users for release candidates.
Regards,
-sm
___
Help us build a
24 matches
Mail list logo
