[Clamav-users] Can anybody direct me to the correct postfix/amavis-new clamav configuration

2009-02-27 Thread Goodman, William
I'm running postfix and amavisd-new, spamassassin and clamav. I have all the daemons running and mail is getting filtered through amavisd-new (as per the header), I'm trying to get spammassassin and clamav configured with postfix. I don't know if my mail is being filtered. Could someone point me

Re: [Clamav-users] Can anybody direct me to the correct postfix/amavis-new clamav configuration

2009-02-27 Thread Noel Jones
Goodman, William wrote: I'm running postfix and amavisd-new, spamassassin and clamav. I have all the daemons running and mail is getting filtered through amavisd-new (as per the header), I'm trying to get spammassassin and clamav configured with postfix. I don't know if my mail is being

[Clamav-users] 0.95RC1 availability

2009-02-27 Thread Nigel Horne
Folks, 0.95 RC1 was published on Wednesday 25/2/09. For details of the new features please refer to the Changelog. A what's new document that gives an overview of the new and improved features is currently in preparation for publication on www.clamav.net. For technical information please

Re: [Clamav-users] Can anybody direct me to the correct postfix/amavis-new clamav configuration

2009-02-27 Thread Freddie Cash
On February 27, 2009 8:32 am Goodman, William wrote: I'm running postfix and amavisd-new, spamassassin and clamav. I have all the daemons running and mail is getting filtered through amavisd-new (as per the header), I'm trying to get spammassassin and clamav configured with postfix. I don't

Re: [Clamav-users] Can anybody direct me to the correct postfix/a mavis-new clamav configuration

2009-02-27 Thread Bowie Bailey
Freddie Cash wrote: On February 27, 2009 8:32 am Goodman, William wrote: I'm running postfix and amavisd-new, spamassassin and clamav. I have all the daemons running and mail is getting filtered through amavisd-new (as per the header), I'm trying to get spammassassin and clamav configured

Re: [Clamav-users] [sanesecurity] Re: clamd crashes - further testing

2009-02-27 Thread Bill Landry
Nigel Horne wrote: Folks, 0.95 RC1 was published on Wednesday 25/2/09. It would help us a lot to see if this problem still exists in the new ewlease if as many people as possible were to test this release candidate by downloading it from www.clamav.net. If you have a test

Re: [Clamav-users] Can anybody direct me to the correct postfix/a mavis-new clamav configuration

2009-02-27 Thread Chuck Swiger
On Feb 27, 2009, at 9:32 AM, Bowie Bailey wrote: So long as Postfix can send mail to amavisd-new, and amavisd-new can send the mail back to Postfix, then all you have to do is make sure amavisd-new is configured to correctly use SA and Clam. Also, since amavisd-new incorporates SpamAssassin

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.95RC1 availability

2009-02-27 Thread James Kosin
Nigel Horne wrote: Folks, 0.95 RC1 was published on Wednesday 25/2/09. For details of the new features please refer to the Changelog. A what's new document that gives an overview of the new and improved features is currently in preparation for publication on www.clamav.net. For

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.95RC1 availability

2009-02-27 Thread McDonald, Dan
On Fri, 2009-02-27 at 15:36 -0500, James Kosin wrote: Nigel Horne wrote: Folks, 0.95 RC1 was published on Wednesday 25/2/09. Nigel, Compiles and links in FC1. I know it is old; but, nothing is broken in the compiling. Just finished altering the mandriva spec file so it will

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.95RC1 availability

2009-02-27 Thread McDonald, Dan
On Fri, 2009-02-27 at 14:48 -0600, McDonald, Dan wrote: On Fri, 2009-02-27 at 15:36 -0500, James Kosin wrote: Nigel Horne wrote: Folks, 0.95 RC1 was published on Wednesday 25/2/09. Nigel, Compiles and links in FC1. I know it is old; but, nothing is broken in the

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.95RC1 availability

2009-02-27 Thread Bill Landry
Nigel Horne wrote: Folks, 0.95 RC1 was published on Wednesday 25/2/09. For details of the new features please refer to the Changelog. A what's new document that gives an overview of the new and improved features is currently in preparation for publication on www.clamav.net. For

Re: [Clamav-users] [sanesecurity] Re: clamd crashes - further testing

2009-02-27 Thread Nigel Horne
Bill Landry wrote: Nigel, ClamAV 0.95rc1 compiles and installs fine on Fedora 10. However, the clamscan -d test now appears to be more restrictive in what it finds and reports as malformed. Hi Bill, Thanks very much for trying this for us. I have created a file of what was not

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.95RC1 availability

2009-02-27 Thread Nigel Horne
Bill Landry wrote: Just to update this thread, RC1 compiles and installs without error/issue on Fedora 10. The one thing I have noticed is that when I stop the clamd service now (service clamd stop), I see the following in the clamd.log: WARNING: Syncpipe write failed Here are all

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.95RC1 availability

2009-02-27 Thread Török Edwin
On 2009-02-27 22:58, McDonald, Dan wrote: This is new. Is there another library that has been added to the requirements? Starting Clam AntiVirus Daemon: LibClamAV Warning: Cannot dlopen: file not found - unrar support unavailable This is clamav's libclamunrar. If you've built without

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.95RC1 availability

2009-02-27 Thread Brian Morrison
On Fri, 27 Feb 2009 12:08:11 -0500 Nigel Horne n...@bandsman.co.uk wrote: If you don't have access to a test machine you can still help us by downloading it and checking that it compiles and links on your platform. I successfully built RPMs in the usual way on my rather old Redhat 9 system.

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.95RC1 availability

2009-02-27 Thread McDonald, Dan
On Fri, 2009-02-27 at 23:34 +0200, Török Edwin wrote: On 2009-02-27 22:58, McDonald, Dan wrote: This is new. Is there another library that has been added to the requirements? Starting Clam AntiVirus Daemon: LibClamAV Warning: Cannot dlopen: file not found - unrar support unavailable

[Clamav-users] 0.95 rc1 in Solaris 9

2009-02-27 Thread Dennis Peterson
There is no stdinit.h in my system so clamdtop failed. I disabled the #include in the clamdtop.c code and it built and linked. Not sure what it might fail to do later. $ gcc --version gcc (GCC) 3.3.2 It built fine in RedHat Linux 2.6.9-67.0.15.EL, 32-bit Intel. dp

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.95 rc1 in Solaris 9

2009-02-27 Thread Dennis Peterson
Dennis Peterson wrote: There is no stdinit.h in my system so clamdtop failed. I disabled the #include in the clamdtop.c code and it built and linked. Not sure what it might fail to do later. $ gcc --version gcc (GCC) 3.3.2 It built fine in RedHat Linux 2.6.9-67.0.15.EL, 32-bit

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.95 rc1 in Solaris 9

2009-02-27 Thread Gary L Burnore
You can use inttypes.h instead, but you'd do well to just upgrade to Solaris 10 as there are MANY good reasons to do so. Look up ZFS. Gary L. Burnore gburn...@databasix.com -Original Message- From: clamav-users-boun...@lists.clamav.net

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.95 rc1 in Solaris 9

2009-02-27 Thread Dennis Peterson
Gary L Burnore wrote: You can use inttypes.h instead, but you'd do well to just upgrade to Solaris 10 as there are MANY good reasons to do so. Look up ZFS. Gary L. Burnore gburn...@databasix.com There are not enough reasons to do so - it's a very big job to drag a lot of

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.95 rc1 in Solaris 9

2009-02-27 Thread Nathan Brink
Dennis Peterson wrote: Regarding stdint.h, I'm surprised the code linked without it. I can't expect this to be the only surprise. stdint.h and other includes like stdio.h, unistd.h all define things found in the standard C library. GCC always links your program against the standard C

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.95RC1 availability

2009-02-27 Thread Chris
On Fri, 2009-02-27 at 14:58 -0600, McDonald, Dan wrote: This is new. Is there another library that has been added to the requirements? Starting Clam AntiVirus Daemon: LibClamAV Warning: Cannot dlopen: file not found - unrar support unavailable Dan, nothing to do actually with the subject