Re: [Clamav-users] 0.95 rc1 in Solaris 9

2009-02-28 Thread Török Edwin
On 2009-02-28 03:20, Nathan Brink wrote: Dennis Peterson wrote: Regarding stdint.h, I'm surprised the code linked without it. I can't expect this to be the only surprise. I removed the stdint.h include now. I only tested clamdtop on Solaris 10/x86, I don't have Solaris 9. If it

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.95RC1 availability

2009-02-28 Thread Török Edwin
On 2009-02-28 01:11, McDonald, Dan wrote: On Fri, 2009-02-27 at 23:34 +0200, Török Edwin wrote: On 2009-02-27 22:58, McDonald, Dan wrote: This is new. Is there another library that has been added to the requirements? Starting Clam AntiVirus Daemon: LibClamAV Warning: Cannot

[Clamav-users] clamd - changes in protocol - 0.95

2009-02-28 Thread Jose-Marcio Martins da Cruz
Hello, At : https://wiki.clamav.net/Main/UpgradeNotes095 I read : ** In clamd 0.95 it is recommended to prefix all commands with the z character, to indicate that the command will be deliminated by a '\0' character; clamd will then continue reading

Re: [Clamav-users] clamd - changes in protocol - 0.95

2009-02-28 Thread Török Edwin
On 2009-02-28 11:54, Jose-Marcio Martins da Cruz wrote: Hello, At : https://wiki.clamav.net/Main/UpgradeNotes095 I read : ** In clamd 0.95 it is recommended to prefix all commands with the z character, to indicate that the command will be

Re: [Clamav-users] clamd - changes in protocol - 0.95

2009-02-28 Thread Jose-Marcio Martins da Cruz
Török Edwin wrote: On 2009-02-28 11:54, Jose-Marcio Martins da Cruz wrote: Hello, At : https://wiki.clamav.net/Main/UpgradeNotes095 I read : ** In clamd 0.95 it is recommended to prefix all commands with the z character, to indicate that the

Re: [Clamav-users] clamd - changes in protocol - 0.95

2009-02-28 Thread Török Edwin
On 2009-02-28 12:18, Jose-Marcio Martins da Cruz wrote: I see. Removing a '\n' when it's just before the '\0' may not be better but doesn't harm. I'm wrong ? As I said, that is a problem if the filename ends with \n, if I remove the \n it will no longer find the file. I'm trying to

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.95RC1 availability

2009-02-28 Thread Tom Shaw
At 12:08 PM -0500 2/27/09, Nigel Horne wrote: Folks, 0.95 RC1 was published on Wednesday 25/2/09. For details of the new features please refer to the Changelog. A what's new document that gives an overview of the new and improved features is currently in preparation for publication on

Re: [Clamav-users] malformed securiteinfo.hdb

2009-02-28 Thread Tom Shaw
Bill Have you informed SecuriteInfo about the issues with the securiteinfo.hdb signature database file? Do you know when it might be fixed? I would like to put 0.95rcx and all unofficials in test but so far I have had to disable to SecuriteInfo's updates in your script to operate the new clam

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.95RC1 availability

2009-02-28 Thread McDonald, Dan
From: Török Edwin On 2009-02-28 01:11, McDonald, Dan wrote: On Fri, 2009-02-27 at 23:34 +0200, Török Edwin wrote: On 2009-02-27 22:58, McDonald, Dan wrote: This is new. Is there another library that has been added to the requirements? Starting Clam AntiVirus Daemon: LibClamAV

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.95RC1 availability

2009-02-28 Thread Török Edwin
On 2009-02-28 17:35, McDonald, Dan wrote: From: Török Edwin On 2009-02-28 01:11, McDonald, Dan wrote: On Fri, 2009-02-27 at 23:34 +0200, Török Edwin wrote: On 2009-02-27 22:58, McDonald, Dan wrote: This is new. Is there another library that has

Re: [Clamav-users] malformed securiteinfo.hdb

2009-02-28 Thread Bill Landry
Tom Shaw wrote: Bill Have you informed SecuriteInfo about the issues with the securiteinfo.hdb signature database file? Do you know when it might be fixed? I would like to put 0.95rcx and all unofficials in test but so far I have had to disable to SecuriteInfo's updates in your script

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.95RC1 availability

2009-02-28 Thread McDonald, Dan
From: Török Edwin On 2009-02-28 17:35, McDonald, Dan wrote: From: Török Edwin On 2009-02-28 01:11, McDonald, Dan wrote: On Fri, 2009-02-27 at 23:34 +0200, Török Edwin wrote: On 2009-02-27 22:58, McDonald, Dan wrote: This is new. Is there another

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.95RC1 availability

2009-02-28 Thread Török Edwin
On 2009-02-28 17:56, McDonald, Dan wrote: From: Török Edwin On 2009-02-28 17:35, McDonald, Dan wrote: From: Török Edwin On 2009-02-28 01:11, McDonald, Dan wrote: On Fri, 2009-02-27 at 23:34 +0200, Török Edwin wrote: On 2009-02-27

Re: [Clamav-users] clamunrar_iface (was clamav 0.95RC1 availabilty)

2009-02-28 Thread McDonald, Dan
From: Török Edwin On 2009-02-28 17:56, McDonald, Dan wrote: From: Török Edwin dlopen does look for .so files, if the .la are not found, but it is not finding it, since the code is looking for /usr/lib/libclamunrar_iface.so instead of /usr/lib/libclamunrar_iface.so.6 when

Re: [Clamav-users] clamunrar_iface (was clamav 0.95RC1 availabilty)

2009-02-28 Thread Török Edwin
On 2009-02-28 18:08, McDonald, Dan wrote: From: Török Edwin On 2009-02-28 17:56, McDonald, Dan wrote: From: Török Edwin dlopen does look for .so files, if the .la are not found, but it is not finding it, since the code is looking for /usr/lib/libclamunrar_iface.so instead of

Re: [Clamav-users] clamunrar_iface

2009-02-28 Thread McDonald, Dan
From: Török Edwin On 2009-02-28 18:08, McDonald, Dan wrote: From: Török Edwin On 2009-02-28 17:56, McDonald, Dan wrote: From: Török Edwin dlopen does look for .so files, if the .la are not found, but it is not finding it, since the code is looking for

Re: [Clamav-users] clamunrar_iface

2009-02-28 Thread Török Edwin
On 2009-02-28 18:29, McDonald, Dan wrote: From: Török Edwin On 2009-02-28 18:08, McDonald, Dan wrote: From: Török Edwin On 2009-02-28 17:56, McDonald, Dan wrote: From: Török Edwin dlopen does look for .so files, if the .la are not found, but it is not finding it,

[Clamav-users] clamd crashing

2009-02-28 Thread Chris
I've seen two crashes in two days right after a freshclam run and databases are reloaded. Information is below: ClamAV 0.94.2/9057 Mandriva 2009 Free Mem:774632k total, 696560k used,78072k free,96912k buffers Swap: 1076312k total, 179420k used, 896892k free, 166164k cached

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.95 rc1 in Solaris 9

2009-02-28 Thread Dennis Peterson
Török Edwin wrote: On 2009-02-28 03:20, Nathan Brink wrote: Dennis Peterson wrote: Regarding stdint.h, I'm surprised the code linked without it. I can't expect this to be the only surprise. I removed the stdint.h include now. I only tested clamdtop on Solaris 10/x86, I don't

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.95RC1 availability

2009-02-28 Thread G.W. Haywood
Hi there, On Sat, 28 Feb 2009 Nigel Horne wrote: 0.95 RC1 was published on Wednesday 25/2/09. Compiled OK on three platforms. Didn't install it on any of them - production machines - but clamdtop complains as expected when run on all of them. :) i686 (dual Pentium III) / RedHat 9 much

Re: [Clamav-users] clamd crashing

2009-02-28 Thread Török Edwin
On 2009-02-28 18:52, Chris wrote: I've seen two crashes in two days right after a freshclam run and databases are reloaded. Information is below: ClamAV 0.94.2/9057 Mandriva 2009 Free Mem:774632k total, 696560k used,78072k free,96912k buffers Swap: 1076312k total, 179420k

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.95 rc1 in Solaris 9

2009-02-28 Thread Török Edwin
On 2009-02-28 18:53, Dennis Peterson wrote: Török Edwin wrote: On 2009-02-28 03:20, Nathan Brink wrote: Dennis Peterson wrote: Regarding stdint.h, I'm surprised the code linked without it. I can't expect this to be the only surprise. I removed the

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.95 rc1 in Solaris 9

2009-02-28 Thread Dennis Peterson
Török Edwin wrote: Well you already built it, didn't you? What is your impression? I'm open to suggestions, if you want some additional features. BTW you can ./configure --disable-clamdtop if you don't want it, and it should automatically get disabled if ncurses is not available. I viewed

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.95 rc1 in Solaris 9

2009-02-28 Thread Török Edwin
On 2009-02-28 20:22, Dennis Peterson wrote: Török Edwin wrote: Well you already built it, didn't you? What is your impression? I'm open to suggestions, if you want some additional features. BTW you can ./configure --disable-clamdtop if you don't want it, and it should automatically get

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.95 rc1 in Solaris 9

2009-02-28 Thread Dennis Peterson
Török Edwin wrote: On 2009-02-28 20:22, Dennis Peterson wrote: Török Edwin wrote: Well you already built it, didn't you? What is your impression? I'm open to suggestions, if you want some additional features. BTW you can ./configure --disable-clamdtop if you don't want it, and it should

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav 0.95RC1

2009-02-28 Thread sydz
Nigel Horne wrote: Folks, 0.95 RC1 was published on Wednesday 25/2/09. This is what is returned on OS X 10.4.11: make check-TESTS *** Unit tests disabled in this build *** Use ./configure --enable-check to enable them SKIP: check_clamav *** Unit tests disabled in this build *** Use

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.95 rc1 in Solaris 9

2009-02-28 Thread Bill Landry
Török Edwin wrote: There is something wrong with the background color, this is how it should look like (screenshot from an earlier version): https://wwws.clamav.net/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=769 On Fedora 10, mine looks the same as Dennis' - oh, and the F1 - help key appears to do nothing,

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.95 rc1 in Solaris 9

2009-02-28 Thread Dennis Peterson
Bill Landry wrote: Török Edwin wrote: There is something wrong with the background color, this is how it should look like (screenshot from an earlier version): https://wwws.clamav.net/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=769 On Fedora 10, mine looks the same as Dennis' - oh, and the F1 - help key

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.95 rc1 in Solaris 9

2009-02-28 Thread Dennis Peterson
Dennis Peterson wrote: Bill Landry wrote: Török Edwin wrote: There is something wrong with the background color, this is how it should look like (screenshot from an earlier version): https://wwws.clamav.net/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=769 On Fedora 10, mine looks the same as Dennis' - oh, and

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.95 rc1 in Solaris 9

2009-02-28 Thread Bill Landry
Dennis Peterson wrote: Dennis Peterson wrote: Bill Landry wrote: Török Edwin wrote: There is something wrong with the background color, this is how it should look like (screenshot from an earlier version): https://wwws.clamav.net/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=769 On Fedora 10, mine looks the

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.95 rc1 in Solaris 9

2009-02-28 Thread Török Edwin
On 2009-02-28 21:18, Bill Landry wrote: Dennis Peterson wrote: Dennis Peterson wrote: Bill Landry wrote: Török Edwin wrote: There is something wrong with the background color, this is how it should look like (screenshot from an earlier version):

Re: [Clamav-users] clamd - changes in protocol - 0.95

2009-02-28 Thread Jose-Marcio Martins da Cruz
Török Edwin wrote: On 2009-02-28 12:18, Jose-Marcio Martins da Cruz wrote: I see. Removing a '\n' when it's just before the '\0' may not be better but doesn't harm. I'm wrong ? As I said, that is a problem if the filename ends with \n, if I remove the \n it will no longer find the

Re: [Clamav-users] clamd - changes in protocol - 0.95

2009-02-28 Thread Török Edwin
On 2009-02-28 22:14, Jose-Marcio Martins da Cruz wrote: Török Edwin wrote: On 2009-02-28 12:18, Jose-Marcio Martins da Cruz wrote: I see. Removing a '\n' when it's just before the '\0' may not be better but doesn't harm. I'm wrong ? As I said, that is a problem if the

Re: [Clamav-users] clamd - changes in protocol - 0.95

2009-02-28 Thread Jose-Marcio Martins da Cruz
Török Edwin wrote: Thanks for the suggestion. I've opened an enhancement bug: https://wwws.clamav.net/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1437 Nice ! 8-) Either way, nCOMMANDS still remain interesting when using a telnet client for, e.g., debug purposes. Yes, that is one of the reasons why I

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.95 rc1 in Solaris 9

2009-02-28 Thread shuttlebox
I get this when compiling 0.95rc1 on Solaris 8 with Sun Studio 11: source='netcode.c' object='netcode.o' libtool=no \ DEPDIR=.deps depmode=none /bin/bash ../config/depcomp \ /opt/studio/SOS11/SUNWspro/bin/cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -I../clamd -I../libclamav -I../shared -I..

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.95 rc1 in Solaris 9

2009-02-28 Thread Bill Landry
Török Edwin wrote: On 2009-02-28 21:18, Bill Landry wrote: Dennis Peterson wrote: Dennis Peterson wrote: Bill Landry wrote: Török Edwin wrote: There is something wrong with the background color, this is how it should look like (screenshot from an earlier

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.95 rc1 in Solaris 9

2009-02-28 Thread Steve Holdoway
On Sat, 28 Feb 2009 14:38:04 -0800 Bill Landry b...@inetmsg.com wrote: I am not running any GUI, I ssh into the server and launch clamdtop, and F1 is just ignored. Do I need to be on the server in GUI mode to see any F1 results? ssh -X server may help ( no I haven't a clue whether it will,

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.95 rc1 in Solaris 9

2009-02-28 Thread Nathan Brink
Steve Holdoway wrote: On Sat, 28 Feb 2009 14:38:04 -0800 Bill Landryb...@inetmsg.com wrote: I am not running any GUI, I'm pretty sure this means that he is logging in and running ssh from vt1, not using X at all. I ssh into the server and launch clamdtop, and F1 is just ignored. Do I

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.95 rc1 in Solaris 9

2009-02-28 Thread Bill Landry
Nathan Brink wrote: Steve Holdoway wrote: On Sat, 28 Feb 2009 14:38:04 -0800 Bill Landryb...@inetmsg.com wrote: I am not running any GUI, I'm pretty sure this means that he is logging in and running ssh from vt1, not using X at all. I ssh into the server and launch clamdtop, and F1

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.95 rc1 in Solaris 9

2009-02-28 Thread Steve Holdoway
On Sat, 28 Feb 2009 15:50:39 -0800 Bill Landry b...@inetmsg.com wrote: I think no GUI means no X. That is correct, no X. Bill Sorry, I sort of expected that you'd have an X server running on your local workstation... you don't need one running on the remote machine. Steve -- Steve

[Clamav-users] 0.95 rc1 OSX 10.5 issues

2009-02-28 Thread Tom Shaw
Some issues: socat ran fine on 0.94.2 but on 0.95.rc1 echo PING|socat - /var/tmp/clamd.socket is silent yet I can type socat - /var/tmp/clamd.socket and then type PINGreturn on the command line and I get PONG I have to admit this confuses me. Then, I ran clamdscan ~/ and it mostly worked

Re: [Clamav-users] clamd crashing

2009-02-28 Thread Chris
On Sat, 2009-02-28 at 20:01 +0200, Török Edwin wrote: But are Sanesecurity sigs loaded? If yes, please add all information to https://wwws.clamav.net/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1370 Best regards, --Edwin Edwin, pardon the off list reply/question but just had another crash this time right

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.95 rc1 in Solaris 9

2009-02-28 Thread Gary L Burnore
-Original Message- From: clamav-users-boun...@lists.clamav.net [mailto:clamav-users-boun...@lists.clamav.net] On Behalf Of Bill Landry Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2009 6:51 PM To: ClamAV users ML Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] 0.95 rc1 in Solaris 9 Nathan Brink wrote: Steve

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.95 rc1 in Solaris 9

2009-02-28 Thread Nathan Brink
Gary L Burnore wrote: That is correct, no X. Get yourself a copy of Xming (free) and set it up. You'll have X. Make sure some sort of display variable is set. (The ssh -X merely enables X connections if it's not already part of your shell). If xclock or xterm aren't in your path,

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.95 rc1 in Solaris 9

2009-02-28 Thread Dennis Peterson
Nathan Brink wrote: Gary L Burnore wrote: That is correct, no X. Get yourself a copy of Xming (free) and set it up. You'll have X. Make sure some sort of display variable is set. (The ssh -X merely enables X connections if it's not already part of your shell). If xclock or xterm

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.95 rc1 in Solaris 9

2009-02-28 Thread Bill Landry
Nathan Brink wrote: Gary L Burnore wrote: That is correct, no X. Get yourself a copy of Xming (free) and set it up. You'll have X. Make sure some sort of display variable is set. (The ssh -X merely enables X connections if it's not already part of your shell). If xclock or xterm

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.95 rc1 OSX 10.5 issues

2009-02-28 Thread Bill Landry
Tom Shaw wrote: Some issues: socat ran fine on 0.94.2 but on 0.95.rc1 echo PING|socat - /var/tmp/clamd.socket is silent yet I can type Tom, are you sure that is the correct path to your clamd.socket? Just curious, because socat if working and responding with PONG fine for me when I

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.95 rc1 OSX 10.5 issues

2009-02-28 Thread Bill Landry
Bill Landry wrote: Tom Shaw wrote: Some issues: socat ran fine on 0.94.2 but on 0.95.rc1 echo PING|socat - /var/tmp/clamd.socket is silent yet I can type Tom, are you sure that is the correct path to your clamd.socket? Just curious, because socat if working and responding with PONG

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.95 rc1 in Solaris 9

2009-02-28 Thread Dennis Peterson
Bill Landry wrote: Nathan Brink wrote: Gary L Burnore wrote: That is correct, no X. Get yourself a copy of Xming (free) and set it up. You'll have X. Make sure some sort of display variable is set. (The ssh -X merely enables X connections if it's not already part of your shell).

Re: [Clamav-users] clamd crashing

2009-02-28 Thread Chris
On Sat, 2009-02-28 at 20:01 +0200, Török Edwin wrote: Feb 28 08:28:31 localhost freshclam[9014]: Clamd successfully notified about the update. Feb 28 08:28:31 localhost clamd[4553]: Reading databases from /var/lib/clamav Feb 28 08:28:31 localhost freshclam[9014]: SubmitDetectionStats: