Hi Folks
I used to run clamav-milter without --external under 0.85. After
upgrading to 0.86.2 I see an error --timeout must not be given when
--external is not given. There is no such thing as timeout in my config
so this is really weird. The only way getting rid of this was to specify
Stephen Gran wrote:
...
So you want either all possible checks, or no seperable logging? That
does seem like a rather drastic set of solutions to a trivial to fix
bug. Moving about 10 lines of code will fix the bug under discussion,
might lead to problems with logging _before_ dropping
Stephen Gran wrote:
On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 02:56:14PM +, Erich Titl said:
Stephen Gran wrote:
...
So you want either all possible checks, or no seperable logging? That
does seem like a rather drastic set of solutions to a trivial to fix
bug. Moving about 10 lines of code will fix
Hi folks
being the lazy bum on the block, are there any config file changes
between 0.84 and 0.85. The changelog suggests none.
Thanks
Erich
___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
At 15:30 06.10.2004 +1000, you wrote:
Hello again,
I am still getting the below message after starting clamd clamav-milter and sendmail
in that order. clamd and clamav-milter start without any errors being reported in
either clamd.log or /var/log/messages. When I start sendmail, which starts
Hi
At 17:03 06.10.2004 +1000, you wrote:
...
I start clamd by just typing /usr/local/sbin/clamd. Is there a problem with that?
If the config file is where clamd expects it, no. I just provide it for clarity.
Does the LocalSocket exist and what are the permissions?
cheers
Erich
THINK
At 15:32 04.10.2004 +1000, Simon Christian wrote:
Hi all,
I've been trying to get clamav-milter working with sendmail 8.13.1 on a linux box for
a couple of days, but i continue to get the following error message in the system
logs when sending email through it:
Oct 4 16:13:04 localhost
At 08:06 21.08.2004 -0600, you wrote:
Thats why the new method of using DNS
to cache the version number will be a much better solution and I think
it will allow more frequent checks without burdening the mirrors and
shifting the load to the DNS infrastructure.
I am not a DNS expert by any means
At 18:40 15.08.2004, Fajar Nugraha wrote:
On Sun, 15 Aug 2004 08:25:36 -0500
Jeremy Kitchen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Saturday 14 August 2004 07:11 am, Jason Haar wrote:
On Sat, Aug 14, 2004 at 01:07:06PM +0700, Fajar Nugraha wrote:
How about incremental updates?
I still don't see why rsync
At 22:19 15.08.2004, you wrote:
Hmmm...can't get sendmail to compile and install libmilter libraries. At
least when I do this search nothing turns up (except in the sendmail src):
find /usr -name '*libmilter*'
This is basically for the sendmail forum, I see you are crossposting there,
bad
At 13:17 13.08.2004, you wrote:
Hi,
Following the long thread of Idea for more timely virusdb updates, I
have put together
a basic system of putting daily.cvd in DNS TXT records.
It stores current version of daily.cvd, new signatures, and what time a
particular signature was added.
Which means
At 21:13 13.08.2004, you wrote:
On Fri, 13 Aug 2004 at 19:48:34 +0200, Erich Titl wrote:
[...]
7) rebuild a .CVD file
I have not been able to rebuild the cvd file using sigtool, so this is for
someone with more sigtool experience, but the diff of the two files show
that a patch is easily
Hi
At 21:41 13.08.2004, you wrote:
Erich Titl wanted us to know:
Nice, we could actually build a wrapper around freshclam to only fetch when
there is a new version ready.
It already does this.
Yes, but it uses TCP, not hierarchically distributed servers, all this has
been discussed lately. DNS
Tomasz Kojm wrote:
On Fri, 13 Aug 2004 22:04:31 +0200
Erich Titl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
become an issue). I believe if such a process can verify the md5sum of
the input file against a publicly known md5sum of the original input,
then to some extent a cdv file could be created locally
At 16:09 12.08.2004, Randall Perry wrote:
I'm still having trouble trying to find info on using milter, clamav with
OSX.
AFAIK you should be able to recompile sendmail, Then you get the latest
version with all goodies.
cheers
Erich
THINK
Püntenstrasse 39
8143 Stallikon
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OK folks, chiming in again with my more or less educated opinion.
DNS was built exactly to distribute fast and reliably small chunks of
information (most or the time address related information to start with).
Is an MX record now exactly an address related information, one would guess
yes. Was
At 16:03 10.08.2004, you wrote:
...
I've also thought about rsync -- if putting the cvd files on an rsync server
would lighten the load at all.
Oh it would, rsync is quite effective. Another possibility might be to
patch the .cvd file(s)
0.02
Erich
THINK
Püntenstrasse 39
8143 Stallikon
17 matches
Mail list logo
