Re: [Clamav-users] clamd on Solaris ceases functioning after a while

Igor Brezac wrote: On Fri, 18 Feb 2005, James Lick wrote: My clamd is at 12mb process size currently. I haven't noticed memory bloat in recent versions. This is the starting clamd memory footprint. How many messages are you scanning? 0.80 ran fine, I noticed the problem since 0.81

Re: [Clamav-users] Exclude with clamdscan

in performance is insignificant. clamdscan only has a big advantage over clamscan when scanning a single file or only a few files at a time. -- James Lick -- -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://jameslick.com/ ___ http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman

Re: [Clamav-users] v0.81 libclamav clearerr on YDL 4.0, PPC

in /usr and the other in /usr/local. Remove all of your ClamAV installations and try again. -- James Lick -- -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://jameslick.com/ ___ http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users

Re: [Clamav-users] mails not getting scanned

will often not be detected in an attachment. It is fixed in CVS. The eicar tests work fine, so try with those instead if you don't want to use the CVS version. -- James Lick -- -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://jameslick.com/ ___ http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin

Re: [Clamav-users] corrupt mailbox after clamav works on it

which is a wrapper to safely interface between procmail and ClamAV. Also you usually don't need to use a lock file for a procmail filter. -- James Lick -- -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://jameslick.com/ ___ http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman

Re: [Clamav-users] Grepping of clamscan output (or use of returncodes)

. -- James Lick -- -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://jameslick.com/ ___ http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users

Re: [Clamav-users] Grepping of clamscan output (or use of returncodes)

Lars Monsees wrote: I thought that clamdscan isn't able to scan a scream as this isn't stated in the man-pages. Older versions had problems with clamdscan in stream mode, but it has worked since version 0.70. -- James Lick -- -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://jameslick.com

Re: [Clamav-users] Freshclam undefined symbol error.

is the libclamav being used? Is that a current version? -- James Lick -- -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://jameslick.com/ ___ http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users

Re: [Clamav-users] mbox files

man page for details. You might want to use clamassassin in your filter to separate infected and safe emails, as the filters usually use procmail, and clamassassin is a procmail filter interface to ClamAV. -- James Lick -- -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://jameslick.com

Re: [Clamav-users] cl_retver: referenced symbol not found

things needing LD_LIBRARY_PATH. Software on Solaris should be compiled with -R ld flag if you want the shared library somewhere nonstandard. -- James Lick -- -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://jameslick.com/ ___ http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman

Re: [Clamav-users] clamd performance on Solaris vs Linux

above 1% CPU. It only processes about 50k messages per day though. -- James Lick -- -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://jameslick.com/ ___ http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users

Re: [Clamav-users] Performance Help - 100% cpu usage

here that such screw ups deserve a bit more direct effect. I think it is entirely reasonable to have clamscan not work if it is called clamdscan. -- James Lick -- -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://jameslick.com/ ___ http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin

Re: [Clamav-users] Performance Help - 100% cpu usage

program and then acting differently depending on which name is run. This is similiar to how gzip and gunzip are actually the same program but when called as gzip it compresses and as gunzip it uncompresses. -- James Lick -- -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://jameslick.com

Re: [Clamav-users] Problems Compiling on Solaris X86 Box

scanners.lo BZ2_bzReadClose scanners.lo ld: fatal: Symbol referencing errors. No output written to .libs/libclamav.so.1.0.4 ClamAV 0.80 (and the rc versions) compiles fine for me on Solaris 10 B63 x86, so it is not a general Solaris x86 problem. -- James Lick -- -- [EMAIL

Re: [Clamav-users] illegal instruction (NEW)

if that helps. -- James Lick -- -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://jameslick.com/ --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170 Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on who ports your project

Re: [Clamav-users] Clamd not picking up W32.Mydoom.T@mm

System Administrator wrote: SECURITY WARNING: NO SUPPORT FOR DIGITAL SIGNATURES You compiled ClamAV without libgmp installed. I'm surprised it works at all. -- James Lick -- -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://jameslick.com/ --- This SF.Net email

Re: [Clamav-users] Can I submit a file if I'm not sure it's a virus?

. I got a couple that slipped through just before the update, but they are being caught now. My other virus scanners still don't detect it. -- James Lick -- -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://jameslick.com/ --- This SF.Net email is sponsored

Re: [Clamav-users] OpenSource Clamav not ready?

scan over 10,000 emails a day, and it's done quite well. -- James Lick -- -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://jameslick.com/ --- SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media 100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD

Re: [Clamav-users] Re: clamscan dumps core

fairly often as the newer viruses are not always detected by older versions of ClamAV. -- James Lick -- -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://jameslick.com/ --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by OSTG. Have you noticed the changes on Linux.com

Re: [Clamav-users] Migration from 'clamscan' to 'clamdscan' Unsuccessful

that the clamassassin documentation is not completely clear about that. By the way, the clamassasin mailing lists and my contact info are on the clamassassin web page at http://drivel.com/clamassassin/ if there are any future clamassassin problems. -- James Lick -- -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http